[討論] 從數據分析聯盟控球後衛之防守能力
在進行討論之前,先簡易的將討論的數據做定義:
GP Game Played:本季此球員上場次數
DFGM Defended FG Made:被此球員防守時,進攻球員場均之投籃命中數
DFGA Defended FG Attempted:被此球員防守時,進攻球員場均之投籃出手數
DFG% Defended FG%:被此球員防守時,進攻球員場均之投籃命中率,即DFGM/DFGA
FG% Average FG% of the defended player:進攻球員之平均命中率
Diff% DFG%-FG%:即被此球員防守下,進攻者偏離於平常之表現
GP DFGM DFGA DFG% FG% Diff%
S.Curry 49 4 10.3 39.1 43.2 -4.1
C.Paul 53 3.8 9.2 41.9 44.3 -2.4
D.Rose 42 4.4 10.5 42 43.8 -1.7
R.Westbrook 39 3.3 7.5 43.5 44.7 -1.2
J.Wall 53 4.2 10 42.4 43.4 -1
D.Lillard 52 4.7 10.7 43.4 43.7 -0.2
---------------------------------------------------------------
K.Irving 50 5.1 11.3 44.9 43.8 1
M.Conley 49 4.9 10.6 46 43.5 2.5
---------------------------------------------------------------
J.Lin 52 4.6 9.9 46.8 44 2.8
R.Price 41 3.1 6.5 47.7 44.6 3.1
J.Clarkson 31 2.9 6.1 47.6 43.8 3.8
由於都是PG的位置,防守到的球員我們可以假設都是其他球隊的後衛群,因此我們可以
發現每位表上的球員,防守到的球員的平均FG%都介於43~45%之間,相差不大,代表從此
圖表討論球員的防守能力仍算中肯。
從數據上可以得知,板上較常討論到的PG群之中,S.Curry雖然被認為是身體素質不是最
出眾者,但其防守效果使得被防守者命中率下降了4.1%,是上列PG群中負差最大者。
而常被批評防守不專注的R.Westbrook,其防守仍能使得進攻者的命中率下降1.2%。
表中從K.Irving開始,球員的防守效果則相反的使得進攻者的命中率提升,顯示其防守
遜於進攻者平均遇到的防守表現。
由此圖表可以看出,在湖人三位主要PG中由J.Lin的防守最佳,但仍相差聯盟頂尖後衛的
防守一段差距。
儘管球員的個別防守數據也與團隊防守息息相關,此數據也能給大家作為一個參考。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
永遠の0
ゼロ点:ジェレミー·リン
ゼロIQ:バイロンスコット
ゼロ出場:スティーブ·ナッシュ
http://i.imgur.com/K9tAUwM.jpg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.43.15
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1423820210.A.050.html
推
02/13 17:37, , 1F
02/13 17:37, 1F
推
02/13 17:37, , 2F
02/13 17:37, 2F
推
02/13 17:38, , 3F
02/13 17:38, 3F
推
02/13 17:38, , 4F
02/13 17:38, 4F
推
02/13 17:40, , 5F
02/13 17:40, 5F
→
02/13 17:41, , 6F
02/13 17:41, 6F
推
02/13 17:41, , 7F
02/13 17:41, 7F
推
02/13 17:42, , 8F
02/13 17:42, 8F
→
02/13 17:43, , 9F
02/13 17:43, 9F
推
02/13 17:44, , 10F
02/13 17:44, 10F
推
02/13 17:44, , 11F
02/13 17:44, 11F
噓
02/13 17:45, , 12F
02/13 17:45, 12F
推
02/13 17:48, , 13F
02/13 17:48, 13F
推
02/13 17:48, , 14F
02/13 17:48, 14F
推
02/13 17:50, , 15F
02/13 17:50, 15F
推
02/13 17:50, , 16F
02/13 17:50, 16F
→
02/13 17:51, , 17F
02/13 17:51, 17F
推
02/13 17:52, , 18F
02/13 17:52, 18F
推
02/13 17:54, , 19F
02/13 17:54, 19F
推
02/13 17:55, , 20F
02/13 17:55, 20F
推
02/13 17:55, , 21F
02/13 17:55, 21F
推
02/13 17:56, , 22F
02/13 17:56, 22F
推
02/13 17:58, , 23F
02/13 17:58, 23F
推
02/13 17:59, , 24F
02/13 17:59, 24F
→
02/13 18:00, , 25F
02/13 18:00, 25F
推
02/13 18:03, , 26F
02/13 18:03, 26F
推
02/13 18:04, , 27F
02/13 18:04, 27F
推
02/13 18:06, , 28F
02/13 18:06, 28F
推
02/13 18:06, , 29F
02/13 18:06, 29F
推
02/13 18:12, , 30F
02/13 18:12, 30F
推
02/13 18:12, , 31F
02/13 18:12, 31F
推
02/13 18:13, , 32F
02/13 18:13, 32F
推
02/13 18:14, , 33F
02/13 18:14, 33F
推
02/13 18:14, , 34F
02/13 18:14, 34F
推
02/13 18:20, , 35F
02/13 18:20, 35F
推
02/13 18:21, , 36F
02/13 18:21, 36F
推
02/13 18:26, , 37F
02/13 18:26, 37F
推
02/13 18:29, , 38F
02/13 18:29, 38F
推
02/13 18:30, , 39F
02/13 18:30, 39F
推
02/13 18:34, , 40F
02/13 18:34, 40F
推
02/13 18:37, , 41F
02/13 18:37, 41F
推
02/13 18:48, , 42F
02/13 18:48, 42F
推
02/13 18:56, , 43F
02/13 18:56, 43F
推
02/13 19:16, , 44F
02/13 19:16, 44F
推
02/13 19:17, , 45F
02/13 19:17, 45F
推
02/13 19:24, , 46F
02/13 19:24, 46F
推
02/13 19:27, , 47F
02/13 19:27, 47F
推
02/13 19:57, , 48F
02/13 19:57, 48F
推
02/13 20:15, , 49F
02/13 20:15, 49F
推
02/13 20:15, , 50F
02/13 20:15, 50F
推
02/13 20:25, , 51F
02/13 20:25, 51F
推
02/13 20:27, , 52F
02/13 20:27, 52F
推
02/13 20:39, , 53F
02/13 20:39, 53F
推
02/13 20:43, , 54F
02/13 20:43, 54F
推
02/13 20:45, , 55F
02/13 20:45, 55F
推
02/13 21:01, , 56F
02/13 21:01, 56F
推
02/13 21:06, , 57F
02/13 21:06, 57F
推
02/13 21:15, , 58F
02/13 21:15, 58F
推
02/13 21:28, , 59F
02/13 21:28, 59F
推
02/13 21:29, , 60F
02/13 21:29, 60F
推
02/13 22:01, , 61F
02/13 22:01, 61F
推
02/13 22:23, , 62F
02/13 22:23, 62F
推
02/14 00:49, , 63F
02/14 00:49, 63F
噓
02/14 00:51, , 64F
02/14 00:51, 64F
推
02/14 01:11, , 65F
02/14 01:11, 65F
→
02/14 01:58, , 66F
02/14 01:58, 66F
推
02/14 02:24, , 67F
02/14 02:24, 67F