[討論] 後仰挺腰跳投要被後撤步投籃給取代了嗎?
喬丹的最終技藝, 拉到極致的後仰跳投,
在Kobe的大量使用達到巔峰,
的確曾經是外圍的致命武器,
但缺點是很吃腳力, 距離也拉不到三分。
近年外圍得分手承襲這一套的並不多,
取而代之的是後撤步投籃,
靈活且投籃距離更遠, 對於體能的耗損感覺也稍低,
現在Harden, Curry都是箇中好手。
是有這樣的趨勢嗎
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.194.139.233
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1423316039.A.212.html
推
02/07 21:35, , 1F
02/07 21:35, 1F
推
02/07 21:35, , 2F
02/07 21:35, 2F
→
02/07 21:35, , 3F
02/07 21:35, 3F
→
02/07 21:36, , 4F
02/07 21:36, 4F
推
02/07 21:36, , 5F
02/07 21:36, 5F
噓
02/07 21:36, , 6F
02/07 21:36, 6F
推
02/07 21:36, , 7F
02/07 21:36, 7F
推
02/07 21:37, , 8F
02/07 21:37, 8F
推
02/07 21:37, , 9F
02/07 21:37, 9F
→
02/07 21:38, , 10F
02/07 21:38, 10F
→
02/07 21:38, , 11F
02/07 21:38, 11F
→
02/07 21:39, , 12F
02/07 21:39, 12F
→
02/07 21:39, , 13F
02/07 21:39, 13F
推
02/07 21:39, , 14F
02/07 21:39, 14F
推
02/07 21:39, , 15F
02/07 21:39, 15F
推
02/07 21:39, , 16F
02/07 21:39, 16F
推
02/07 21:39, , 17F
02/07 21:39, 17F
推
02/07 21:39, , 18F
02/07 21:39, 18F
→
02/07 21:39, , 19F
02/07 21:39, 19F
→
02/07 21:40, , 20F
02/07 21:40, 20F
推
02/07 21:41, , 21F
02/07 21:41, 21F
→
02/07 21:41, , 22F
02/07 21:41, 22F
推
02/07 21:45, , 23F
02/07 21:45, 23F
→
02/07 21:46, , 24F
02/07 21:46, 24F
推
02/07 21:47, , 25F
02/07 21:47, 25F
推
02/07 21:57, , 26F
02/07 21:57, 26F
→
02/07 21:57, , 27F
02/07 21:57, 27F
→
02/07 21:58, , 28F
02/07 21:58, 28F
→
02/07 21:59, , 29F
02/07 21:59, 29F
推
02/07 22:01, , 30F
02/07 22:01, 30F
推
02/07 22:06, , 31F
02/07 22:06, 31F
推
02/07 22:09, , 32F
02/07 22:09, 32F
→
02/07 22:09, , 33F
02/07 22:09, 33F
→
02/07 22:09, , 34F
02/07 22:09, 34F
→
02/07 22:09, , 35F
02/07 22:09, 35F
→
02/07 22:09, , 36F
02/07 22:09, 36F
→
02/07 22:09, , 37F
02/07 22:09, 37F
→
02/07 22:09, , 38F
02/07 22:09, 38F
→
02/07 22:09, , 39F
02/07 22:09, 39F
→
02/07 22:09, , 40F
02/07 22:09, 40F
→
02/07 22:09, , 41F
02/07 22:09, 41F
→
02/07 22:09, , 42F
02/07 22:09, 42F
推
02/07 22:10, , 43F
02/07 22:10, 43F
推
02/07 22:10, , 44F
02/07 22:10, 44F
→
02/07 22:10, , 45F
02/07 22:10, 45F
推
02/07 22:21, , 46F
02/07 22:21, 46F
推
02/07 22:24, , 47F
02/07 22:24, 47F
推
02/07 22:27, , 48F
02/07 22:27, 48F
推
02/07 22:28, , 49F
02/07 22:28, 49F
→
02/07 22:29, , 50F
02/07 22:29, 50F
→
02/07 22:29, , 51F
02/07 22:29, 51F
推
02/07 22:49, , 52F
02/07 22:49, 52F
→
02/07 22:49, , 53F
02/07 22:49, 53F
推
02/07 22:50, , 54F
02/07 22:50, 54F
推
02/07 22:54, , 55F
02/07 22:54, 55F
推
02/07 22:58, , 56F
02/07 22:58, 56F
→
02/07 22:58, , 57F
02/07 22:58, 57F
推
02/07 23:02, , 58F
02/07 23:02, 58F
推
02/07 23:04, , 59F
02/07 23:04, 59F
推
02/07 23:07, , 60F
02/07 23:07, 60F
推
02/07 23:08, , 61F
02/07 23:08, 61F
噓
02/07 23:13, , 62F
02/07 23:13, 62F
推
02/07 23:32, , 63F
02/07 23:32, 63F
噓
02/07 23:33, , 64F
02/07 23:33, 64F
推
02/07 23:34, , 65F
02/07 23:34, 65F
→
02/07 23:34, , 66F
02/07 23:34, 66F
→
02/07 23:36, , 67F
02/07 23:36, 67F
噓
02/07 23:43, , 68F
02/07 23:43, 68F
推
02/07 23:44, , 69F
02/07 23:44, 69F
推
02/07 23:48, , 70F
02/07 23:48, 70F
推
02/08 00:12, , 71F
02/08 00:12, 71F
→
02/08 00:21, , 72F
02/08 00:21, 72F
推
02/08 00:36, , 73F
02/08 00:36, 73F
推
02/08 00:36, , 74F
02/08 00:36, 74F
推
02/08 00:53, , 75F
02/08 00:53, 75F
推
02/08 01:06, , 76F
02/08 01:06, 76F
推
02/08 01:16, , 77F
02/08 01:16, 77F
→
02/08 01:16, , 78F
02/08 01:16, 78F
推
02/08 01:21, , 79F
02/08 01:21, 79F
推
02/08 01:29, , 80F
02/08 01:29, 80F
噓
02/08 01:30, , 81F
02/08 01:30, 81F
→
02/08 01:30, , 82F
02/08 01:30, 82F
推
02/08 01:40, , 83F
02/08 01:40, 83F
推
02/08 02:29, , 84F
02/08 02:29, 84F
→
02/08 02:30, , 85F
02/08 02:30, 85F
→
02/08 02:31, , 86F
02/08 02:31, 86F
→
02/08 02:32, , 87F
02/08 02:32, 87F
→
02/08 02:33, , 88F
02/08 02:33, 88F
→
02/08 02:34, , 89F
02/08 02:34, 89F
推
02/08 08:11, , 90F
02/08 08:11, 90F
推
02/08 09:16, , 91F
02/08 09:16, 91F
推
02/08 09:40, , 92F
02/08 09:40, 92F
推
02/08 09:50, , 93F
02/08 09:50, 93F
推
02/08 11:29, , 94F
02/08 11:29, 94F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):