[討論] 各位喜歡零容忍還是喬丹時代的碰撞等級?
老一輩的人都說NBA在喬神 惡漢巴克利 小蟲羅德曼 郵差馬龍 活塞壞孩子時代
才是最好看的 真正展現顯鐵血NBA比賽的張力
強硬的肢體碰撞 使比賽真正進入死鬥模式
歷史上有名的衝突畫面很多
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsctt9xKk6s
早期的代表 大概會是 熱火尼克世仇時期
像莫寧那一次的大亂鬥
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWqv5fNeosc
在來還有著名的奧本山事件
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cTZsqxPVHo
史上星度知名度最高的爭持??(姚明 俠客 T-mac NASH 阿罵 四克拉)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceGRVUjXqM4&x-yt-ts=1422579428&x-yt-cl=85114404#t=25
發現近期都沒有甚麼著名的重大事件
因為零容忍 加上阿泰被禁一整季之後
已經不太有這樣的畫面
不少人認為NBA變得比以前娘
因為零容忍 稍微抗議一下就吹T
各位覺得是好還是壞呢?
個人看法是
可以接受打球小動作或是髒
(如 CP3 爵士雙老 四克拉這種)
或者是故意挑起紛爭
(Matt Barnes Steven Adams Robert Horry 海南高砂這類)
都可以把他視為比賽的一部分
但是要把人弄受傷就不能接受了
如包溫 南烈這種
不知道大家喜歡乾淨零碰撞
一摸毛就BB
還是
只要不要蓄意傷人
有點衝突 使比賽更白熱化
哪一種呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.176.88.69
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1422714025.A.C9C.html
推
01/31 22:21, , 1F
01/31 22:21, 1F
推
01/31 22:21, , 2F
01/31 22:21, 2F
推
01/31 22:22, , 3F
01/31 22:22, 3F
推
01/31 22:22, , 4F
01/31 22:22, 4F
噓
01/31 22:22, , 5F
01/31 22:22, 5F
→
01/31 22:23, , 6F
01/31 22:23, 6F
推
01/31 22:23, , 7F
01/31 22:23, 7F
推
01/31 22:24, , 8F
01/31 22:24, 8F
→
01/31 22:24, , 9F
01/31 22:24, 9F
推
01/31 22:24, , 10F
01/31 22:24, 10F
→
01/31 22:25, , 11F
01/31 22:25, 11F
推
01/31 22:25, , 12F
01/31 22:25, 12F
→
01/31 22:26, , 13F
01/31 22:26, 13F
→
01/31 22:27, , 14F
01/31 22:27, 14F
推
01/31 22:30, , 15F
01/31 22:30, 15F
噓
01/31 22:32, , 16F
01/31 22:32, 16F
→
01/31 22:32, , 17F
01/31 22:32, 17F
推
01/31 22:32, , 18F
01/31 22:32, 18F
推
01/31 22:35, , 19F
01/31 22:35, 19F
推
01/31 22:38, , 20F
01/31 22:38, 20F
推
01/31 22:42, , 21F
01/31 22:42, 21F
推
01/31 22:42, , 22F
01/31 22:42, 22F
推
01/31 22:42, , 23F
01/31 22:42, 23F
推
01/31 22:42, , 24F
01/31 22:42, 24F
推
01/31 22:43, , 25F
01/31 22:43, 25F
推
01/31 22:45, , 26F
01/31 22:45, 26F
推
01/31 22:46, , 27F
01/31 22:46, 27F
→
01/31 22:46, , 28F
01/31 22:46, 28F
推
01/31 22:48, , 29F
01/31 22:48, 29F
推
01/31 22:55, , 30F
01/31 22:55, 30F
推
01/31 22:55, , 31F
01/31 22:55, 31F
噓
01/31 23:02, , 32F
01/31 23:02, 32F
推
01/31 23:05, , 33F
01/31 23:05, 33F
→
01/31 23:06, , 34F
01/31 23:06, 34F
推
01/31 23:21, , 35F
01/31 23:21, 35F
噓
01/31 23:30, , 36F
01/31 23:30, 36F
推
01/31 23:34, , 37F
01/31 23:34, 37F
推
01/31 23:34, , 38F
01/31 23:34, 38F
→
01/31 23:34, , 39F
01/31 23:34, 39F
推
01/31 23:39, , 40F
01/31 23:39, 40F
→
01/31 23:39, , 41F
01/31 23:39, 41F
噓
01/31 23:43, , 42F
01/31 23:43, 42F
推
01/31 23:56, , 43F
01/31 23:56, 43F
推
01/31 23:58, , 44F
01/31 23:58, 44F
→
01/31 23:59, , 45F
01/31 23:59, 45F
推
02/01 00:07, , 46F
02/01 00:07, 46F
推
02/01 00:09, , 47F
02/01 00:09, 47F
→
02/01 00:09, , 48F
02/01 00:09, 48F
→
02/01 00:10, , 49F
02/01 00:10, 49F
→
02/01 00:10, , 50F
02/01 00:10, 50F
→
02/01 00:11, , 51F
02/01 00:11, 51F
→
02/01 00:36, , 52F
02/01 00:36, 52F
→
02/01 00:53, , 53F
02/01 00:53, 53F
→
02/01 01:04, , 54F
02/01 01:04, 54F
→
02/01 01:04, , 55F
02/01 01:04, 55F
→
02/01 01:06, , 56F
02/01 01:06, 56F
→
02/01 01:06, , 57F
02/01 01:06, 57F
→
02/01 01:09, , 58F
02/01 01:09, 58F
→
02/01 01:09, , 59F
02/01 01:09, 59F
→
02/01 01:24, , 60F
02/01 01:24, 60F
→
02/01 01:24, , 61F
02/01 01:24, 61F
推
02/01 02:02, , 62F
02/01 02:02, 62F
推
02/01 02:03, , 63F
02/01 02:03, 63F
→
02/01 02:03, , 64F
02/01 02:03, 64F
推
02/01 02:52, , 65F
02/01 02:52, 65F
→
02/01 02:55, , 66F
02/01 02:55, 66F
→
02/01 07:22, , 67F
02/01 07:22, 67F
→
02/01 07:39, , 68F
02/01 07:39, 68F
→
02/01 07:39, , 69F
02/01 07:39, 69F
→
02/01 07:39, , 70F
02/01 07:39, 70F
推
02/01 08:28, , 71F
02/01 08:28, 71F
→
02/01 08:28, , 72F
02/01 08:28, 72F
推
02/01 10:04, , 73F
02/01 10:04, 73F
→
02/01 10:17, , 74F
02/01 10:17, 74F
推
02/01 11:03, , 75F
02/01 11:03, 75F
推
02/01 15:06, , 76F
02/01 15:06, 76F
推
02/01 19:03, , 77F
02/01 19:03, 77F