Re: [討論] T-mac,carter,AI為何無法跟kobe一樣成就?
※ 引述《DADADODO (大大督)》之銘言:
: kobe最近得分超越了MJ
: 以kobe今天的地位
: 名人堂應該是進得去
: 想起同期的AI,T-mac,Carter
: 其得分能力並不下於kobe
: 甚至這三者都曾把球隊帶進季後賽
: 可是卻連一冠也沒有
: 比起kobe拿到五冠....
: 想起2000年final AI一個人板倒有Oneal的湖人
: 那場比賽真的很感動
: T-mca在魔術時那時根本carry整場比賽
: Carter剛出道號成稱狂暴扣籃
: 可惜最後這三位都是到處流浪...
: 這三者跟kobe比到底少了甚麼??
簡單說就是少了大歐...
請檢視Kobe在沒有大歐之後還沒有迎來Gasol的那兩年...
實話說就是個"摳一輪"...
所以請不要再拿五冠來壓人了...
更別提要跟MJ比...
MJ時期的內線球員是???
MJ時期更不需要靠內線球員撐場面才能贏球...
至於贏AI??
我印象中湖人當時守不住只能叫一個"Tyron Lue"試著守守看...
哪裡來守AI守得很好?
何況還是守一個矮了將近20公分的球員...
對位守到他守住...難道不應該???
所以不需要再放大那五冠跟他目前締造的紀錄...
充其量就是打得夠久...
但如果要說他會是史上最優秀的幾人...
恐怕很難...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.134.157.115
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1418922544.A.8A8.html
→
12/19 01:10, , 1F
12/19 01:10, 1F
噓
12/19 01:10, , 2F
12/19 01:10, 2F
→
12/19 01:11, , 3F
12/19 01:11, 3F
推
12/19 01:11, , 4F
12/19 01:11, 4F
→
12/19 01:12, , 5F
12/19 01:12, 5F
推
12/19 01:13, , 6F
12/19 01:13, 6F
推
12/19 01:14, , 7F
12/19 01:14, 7F
→
12/19 01:15, , 8F
12/19 01:15, 8F
推
12/19 01:15, , 9F
12/19 01:15, 9F
推
12/19 01:16, , 10F
12/19 01:16, 10F
推
12/19 01:24, , 11F
12/19 01:24, 11F
噓
12/19 01:26, , 12F
12/19 01:26, 12F
噓
12/19 01:27, , 13F
12/19 01:27, 13F
噓
12/19 01:30, , 14F
12/19 01:30, 14F
推
12/19 01:33, , 15F
12/19 01:33, 15F
推
12/19 01:35, , 16F
12/19 01:35, 16F
推
12/19 01:36, , 17F
12/19 01:36, 17F
推
12/19 01:36, , 18F
12/19 01:36, 18F
噓
12/19 01:43, , 19F
12/19 01:43, 19F
噓
12/19 01:44, , 20F
12/19 01:44, 20F
推
12/19 01:57, , 21F
12/19 01:57, 21F
噓
12/19 02:00, , 22F
12/19 02:00, 22F
→
12/19 02:00, , 23F
12/19 02:00, 23F
→
12/19 02:01, , 24F
12/19 02:01, 24F
噓
12/19 02:03, , 25F
12/19 02:03, 25F
噓
12/19 02:07, , 26F
12/19 02:07, 26F
噓
12/19 02:09, , 27F
12/19 02:09, 27F
推
12/19 02:21, , 28F
12/19 02:21, 28F
推
12/19 02:25, , 29F
12/19 02:25, 29F
噓
12/19 02:34, , 30F
12/19 02:34, 30F
推
12/19 02:38, , 31F
12/19 02:38, 31F
噓
12/19 02:52, , 32F
12/19 02:52, 32F
→
12/19 02:52, , 33F
12/19 02:52, 33F
噓
12/19 02:54, , 34F
12/19 02:54, 34F
噓
12/19 03:08, , 35F
12/19 03:08, 35F
噓
12/19 03:12, , 36F
12/19 03:12, 36F
→
12/19 03:14, , 37F
12/19 03:14, 37F
噓
12/19 04:10, , 38F
12/19 04:10, 38F
噓
12/19 04:34, , 39F
12/19 04:34, 39F
噓
12/19 04:58, , 40F
12/19 04:58, 40F
噓
12/19 05:04, , 41F
12/19 05:04, 41F
噓
12/19 05:20, , 42F
12/19 05:20, 42F
噓
12/19 06:05, , 43F
12/19 06:05, 43F
噓
12/19 06:11, , 44F
12/19 06:11, 44F
噓
12/19 06:43, , 45F
12/19 06:43, 45F
→
12/19 06:46, , 46F
12/19 06:46, 46F
→
12/19 07:17, , 47F
12/19 07:17, 47F
推
12/19 07:29, , 48F
12/19 07:29, 48F
→
12/19 07:29, , 49F
12/19 07:29, 49F
推
12/19 07:39, , 50F
12/19 07:39, 50F
噓
12/19 07:48, , 51F
12/19 07:48, 51F
噓
12/19 07:54, , 52F
12/19 07:54, 52F
推
12/19 08:08, , 53F
12/19 08:08, 53F
推
12/19 08:15, , 54F
12/19 08:15, 54F
→
12/19 08:18, , 55F
12/19 08:18, 55F
→
12/19 08:20, , 56F
12/19 08:20, 56F
噓
12/19 09:02, , 57F
12/19 09:02, 57F
推
12/19 09:05, , 58F
12/19 09:05, 58F
噓
12/19 09:20, , 59F
12/19 09:20, 59F
噓
12/19 09:39, , 60F
12/19 09:39, 60F
噓
12/19 10:13, , 61F
12/19 10:13, 61F
推
12/19 10:35, , 62F
12/19 10:35, 62F
推
12/19 10:52, , 63F
12/19 10:52, 63F
噓
12/19 11:10, , 64F
12/19 11:10, 64F
噓
12/19 11:19, , 65F
12/19 11:19, 65F
噓
12/19 11:45, , 66F
12/19 11:45, 66F
噓
12/19 11:57, , 67F
12/19 11:57, 67F
噓
12/19 12:42, , 68F
12/19 12:42, 68F
噓
12/19 12:49, , 69F
12/19 12:49, 69F
噓
12/19 12:51, , 70F
12/19 12:51, 70F
噓
12/19 13:27, , 71F
12/19 13:27, 71F
噓
12/19 14:09, , 72F
12/19 14:09, 72F
噓
12/19 18:27, , 73F
12/19 18:27, 73F
→
12/19 20:09, , 74F
12/19 20:09, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):