[討論] 湖人連勝是曇花一現
上場贏老鷹因為老鷹防守太弱
竟然讓湖人得到那麼高的分數 要是碰上強隊
湖人還能得那麼高分嗎??
這場碰上火箭 老實說火箭如果要更上層樓
一定要交易個至少有一號替補等級的球員
不然少了個魔獸 鬍子一人帶雜魚打球真是太累了
不然第四節怎麼會被湖人大逆轉
說真的 湖人不用太開心 禮拜六對上小牛就知道
小牛會告訴湖人什麼才叫做真正的強隊
不要老是打NO GOOD TEAM與主將沒上的球隊 才能贏球~
小牛很快就可以證明湖人就是曇花一現而已~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.45.119.245
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1416492502.A.D20.html
推
11/20 22:09, , 1F
11/20 22:09, 1F
噓
11/20 22:10, , 2F
11/20 22:10, 2F
噓
11/20 22:10, , 3F
11/20 22:10, 3F
噓
11/20 22:10, , 4F
11/20 22:10, 4F
→
11/20 22:11, , 5F
11/20 22:11, 5F
推
11/20 22:11, , 6F
11/20 22:11, 6F
推
11/20 22:11, , 7F
11/20 22:11, 7F
推
11/20 22:11, , 8F
11/20 22:11, 8F
推
11/20 22:13, , 9F
11/20 22:13, 9F
推
11/20 22:14, , 10F
11/20 22:14, 10F
推
11/20 22:14, , 11F
11/20 22:14, 11F
→
11/20 22:15, , 12F
11/20 22:15, 12F
噓
11/20 22:15, , 13F
11/20 22:15, 13F
噓
11/20 22:15, , 14F
11/20 22:15, 14F
噓
11/20 22:15, , 15F
11/20 22:15, 15F
→
11/20 22:15, , 16F
11/20 22:15, 16F
→
11/20 22:15, , 17F
11/20 22:15, 17F
→
11/20 22:16, , 18F
11/20 22:16, 18F
→
11/20 22:16, , 19F
11/20 22:16, 19F
噓
11/20 22:16, , 20F
11/20 22:16, 20F
→
11/20 22:16, , 21F
11/20 22:16, 21F
推
11/20 22:16, , 22F
11/20 22:16, 22F
噓
11/20 22:16, , 23F
11/20 22:16, 23F
→
11/20 22:16, , 24F
11/20 22:16, 24F
噓
11/20 22:17, , 25F
11/20 22:17, 25F
推
11/20 22:17, , 26F
11/20 22:17, 26F
噓
11/20 22:18, , 27F
11/20 22:18, 27F
噓
11/20 22:19, , 28F
11/20 22:19, 28F
噓
11/20 22:19, , 29F
11/20 22:19, 29F
噓
11/20 22:22, , 30F
11/20 22:22, 30F
噓
11/20 22:26, , 31F
11/20 22:26, 31F
噓
11/20 22:27, , 32F
11/20 22:27, 32F
噓
11/20 22:30, , 33F
11/20 22:30, 33F
推
11/20 22:37, , 34F
11/20 22:37, 34F
→
11/20 22:37, , 35F
11/20 22:37, 35F
推
11/20 22:38, , 36F
11/20 22:38, 36F
噓
11/20 22:39, , 37F
11/20 22:39, 37F
推
11/20 22:42, , 38F
11/20 22:42, 38F
推
11/20 22:44, , 39F
11/20 22:44, 39F
噓
11/20 22:53, , 40F
11/20 22:53, 40F
噓
11/20 22:57, , 41F
11/20 22:57, 41F
噓
11/20 22:58, , 42F
11/20 22:58, 42F
噓
11/20 23:00, , 43F
11/20 23:00, 43F
噓
11/20 23:02, , 44F
11/20 23:02, 44F
噓
11/20 23:08, , 45F
11/20 23:08, 45F
噓
11/20 23:12, , 46F
11/20 23:12, 46F
→
11/20 23:13, , 47F
11/20 23:13, 47F
噓
11/20 23:14, , 48F
11/20 23:14, 48F
噓
11/20 23:14, , 49F
11/20 23:14, 49F
噓
11/20 23:17, , 50F
11/20 23:17, 50F
噓
11/20 23:20, , 51F
11/20 23:20, 51F
噓
11/20 23:29, , 52F
11/20 23:29, 52F
推
11/20 23:45, , 53F
11/20 23:45, 53F
噓
11/21 00:21, , 54F
11/21 00:21, 54F
→
11/21 00:22, , 55F
11/21 00:22, 55F
噓
11/21 01:03, , 56F
11/21 01:03, 56F
推
11/21 01:10, , 57F
11/21 01:10, 57F
噓
11/21 01:11, , 58F
11/21 01:11, 58F
噓
11/21 01:38, , 59F
11/21 01:38, 59F
推
11/21 07:05, , 60F
11/21 07:05, 60F
→
11/21 07:30, , 61F
11/21 07:30, 61F
推
11/21 08:07, , 62F
11/21 08:07, 62F
推
11/21 09:13, , 63F
11/21 09:13, 63F
→
11/21 12:16, , 64F
11/21 12:16, 64F
推
11/21 12:18, , 65F
11/21 12:18, 65F
噓
11/21 14:09, , 66F
11/21 14:09, 66F
推
11/22 14:40, , 67F
11/22 14:40, 67F
噓
11/25 01:52, , 68F
11/25 01:52, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
討論
-23
39
討論
8
20
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):
討論
-15
68
討論
-23
39
討論
8
20
討論
5
22
討論
18
27