[討論] 書豪是不是到了該檢討自己的時候?
不論從勇士 尼克 火箭 湖人
每個都有長時間持球的高手
這裡面 五冠的Kobe更是代表人物
而林卻只在沒有隊中的老大在家時 才能夠發揮
但NBA卻是很殘酷的
團隊的打法少之又少
連專攻團隊的馬刺 也常常需要有單打高手助陣
在批評柯比爛投球的同時
是否也該想想 鬍子 Curry 甜瓜 Kobe
其實都是獨當一面的大將
為何不能像小貝一樣 稱職的當一個小螺絲釘呢?
而卻要一直搶冰箱給哈登的球
導致被人當垃圾一樣丟掉呢?
看到火箭的戰績 是否開始覺得 丟掉書豪 是個正確的結果?
連我自己 心中都起了疑問
不知道鄉民怎看書豪?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.226.93.209
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1416318429.A.879.html
推
11/18 21:47, , 1F
11/18 21:47, 1F
推
11/18 21:48, , 2F
11/18 21:48, 2F
→
11/18 21:49, , 3F
11/18 21:49, 3F
→
11/18 21:50, , 4F
11/18 21:50, 4F
推
11/18 21:51, , 5F
11/18 21:51, 5F
→
11/18 21:51, , 6F
11/18 21:51, 6F
推
11/18 21:52, , 7F
11/18 21:52, 7F
→
11/18 21:52, , 8F
11/18 21:52, 8F
噓
11/18 21:53, , 9F
11/18 21:53, 9F
→
11/18 21:54, , 10F
11/18 21:54, 10F
推
11/18 21:54, , 11F
11/18 21:54, 11F
推
11/18 21:55, , 12F
11/18 21:55, 12F
噓
11/18 21:55, , 13F
11/18 21:55, 13F
噓
11/18 21:56, , 14F
11/18 21:56, 14F
→
11/18 21:57, , 15F
11/18 21:57, 15F
推
11/18 21:57, , 16F
11/18 21:57, 16F
→
11/18 21:57, , 17F
11/18 21:57, 17F
→
11/18 21:58, , 18F
11/18 21:58, 18F
噓
11/18 21:59, , 19F
11/18 21:59, 19F
推
11/18 21:59, , 20F
11/18 21:59, 20F
→
11/18 22:00, , 21F
11/18 22:00, 21F
推
11/18 22:00, , 22F
11/18 22:00, 22F
噓
11/18 22:00, , 23F
11/18 22:00, 23F
推
11/18 22:03, , 24F
11/18 22:03, 24F
推
11/18 22:05, , 25F
11/18 22:05, 25F
推
11/18 22:05, , 26F
11/18 22:05, 26F
噓
11/18 22:05, , 27F
11/18 22:05, 27F
推
11/18 22:07, , 28F
11/18 22:07, 28F
噓
11/18 22:07, , 29F
11/18 22:07, 29F
推
11/18 22:08, , 30F
11/18 22:08, 30F
噓
11/18 22:10, , 31F
11/18 22:10, 31F
噓
11/18 22:11, , 32F
11/18 22:11, 32F
噓
11/18 22:11, , 33F
11/18 22:11, 33F
→
11/18 22:14, , 34F
11/18 22:14, 34F
→
11/18 22:17, , 35F
11/18 22:17, 35F
推
11/18 22:18, , 36F
11/18 22:18, 36F
推
11/18 22:18, , 37F
11/18 22:18, 37F
→
11/18 22:18, , 38F
11/18 22:18, 38F
→
11/18 22:19, , 39F
11/18 22:19, 39F
推
11/18 22:19, , 40F
11/18 22:19, 40F
推
11/18 22:19, , 41F
11/18 22:19, 41F
推
11/18 22:20, , 42F
11/18 22:20, 42F
推
11/18 22:20, , 43F
11/18 22:20, 43F
→
11/18 22:20, , 44F
11/18 22:20, 44F
推
11/18 22:24, , 45F
11/18 22:24, 45F
噓
11/18 22:26, , 46F
11/18 22:26, 46F
推
11/18 22:34, , 47F
11/18 22:34, 47F
噓
11/18 22:36, , 48F
11/18 22:36, 48F
推
11/18 22:39, , 49F
11/18 22:39, 49F
噓
11/18 22:40, , 50F
11/18 22:40, 50F
噓
11/18 22:40, , 51F
11/18 22:40, 51F
推
11/18 22:44, , 52F
11/18 22:44, 52F
推
11/18 22:54, , 53F
11/18 22:54, 53F
推
11/18 23:02, , 54F
11/18 23:02, 54F
推
11/18 23:09, , 55F
11/18 23:09, 55F
噓
11/18 23:17, , 56F
11/18 23:17, 56F
推
11/18 23:34, , 57F
11/18 23:34, 57F
噓
11/18 23:58, , 58F
11/18 23:58, 58F
噓
11/19 00:08, , 59F
11/19 00:08, 59F
推
11/19 00:10, , 60F
11/19 00:10, 60F
→
11/19 00:22, , 61F
11/19 00:22, 61F
推
11/19 00:27, , 62F
11/19 00:27, 62F
噓
11/19 00:39, , 63F
11/19 00:39, 63F
噓
11/19 00:48, , 64F
11/19 00:48, 64F
噓
11/19 01:23, , 65F
11/19 01:23, 65F
噓
11/19 02:01, , 66F
11/19 02:01, 66F
噓
11/19 05:07, , 67F
11/19 05:07, 67F
→
11/19 05:07, , 68F
11/19 05:07, 68F
→
11/19 05:07, , 69F
11/19 05:07, 69F
→
11/19 05:07, , 70F
11/19 05:07, 70F
噓
11/19 08:56, , 71F
11/19 08:56, 71F
推
11/19 16:45, , 72F
11/19 16:45, 72F
噓
11/19 22:29, , 73F
11/19 22:29, 73F
推
11/22 14:12, , 74F
11/22 14:12, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):