Re: [討論] NBA有運球很爛的PG嗎??
※ 引述《padaa (大象)》之銘言:
: NBA有那種一遇到包夾或壓迫就會自己運到掉球的控衛,
: 看失誤前幾名的控衛西河或撞球的比賽,
: 發現他們失誤通常都是腦充血或持球時間過長造成的?
: 想問一下,真的有NBA的控衛是那種基本功有問題
: 造成失誤超多的嗎? 這種運球不好的控衛有辦法在NBA生存嗎?
: 還是只能在581生存?
小弟想就看球的印象提出ㄧ點點觀點
豪哥ㄧ被壓迫就運球不穩這點,會不會跟球風"狠勁"不足有關?
印象中很多控衛被逼迫都會有很"強烈" 的護球動作 ,甚至接近把防手者"推開"的程度
印象中CP3就很常甩大屁屁把人頂的很遠,手也用的很勤
看豪哥運球會感覺護球的"力度"不足
無法把防手者"頂"開騰出自己的空間,自然很容易被侵略到球
淺見
新手不會用,重貼抱歉
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 222.251.12.167
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1415975826.A.6B8.html
→
11/14 22:38, , 1F
11/14 22:38, 1F
→
11/14 22:40, , 2F
11/14 22:40, 2F
就是這個意思
→
11/14 22:40, , 3F
11/14 22:40, 3F
→
11/14 22:40, , 4F
11/14 22:40, 4F
推
11/14 22:40, , 5F
11/14 22:40, 5F
→
11/14 22:41, , 6F
11/14 22:41, 6F
推
11/14 22:41, , 7F
11/14 22:41, 7F
→
11/14 22:41, , 8F
11/14 22:41, 8F
→
11/14 22:42, , 9F
11/14 22:42, 9F
→
11/14 22:42, , 10F
11/14 22:42, 10F
→
11/14 22:42, , 11F
11/14 22:42, 11F
推
11/14 22:43, , 12F
11/14 22:43, 12F
→
11/14 22:43, , 13F
11/14 22:43, 13F
※ 編輯: thedan (222.251.12.167), 11/14/2014 22:44:00
推
11/14 22:46, , 14F
11/14 22:46, 14F
→
11/14 22:46, , 15F
11/14 22:46, 15F
→
11/14 22:47, , 16F
11/14 22:47, 16F
→
11/14 22:47, , 17F
11/14 22:47, 17F
推
11/14 22:48, , 18F
11/14 22:48, 18F
以前高中打班際賽時對到ㄧ個校隊學長,他護球時用手把我"推"到我覺得很XX... 在場下
看時都不會這樣覺得。但那個學長算是我蠻崇拜的ㄧ個,所以這招之後就學起來了XD
推
11/14 22:49, , 19F
11/14 22:49, 19F
推
11/14 22:50, , 20F
11/14 22:50, 20F
→
11/14 22:50, , 21F
11/14 22:50, 21F
→
11/14 22:51, , 22F
11/14 22:51, 22F
※ 編輯: thedan (222.251.12.167), 11/14/2014 22:56:37
推
11/14 22:51, , 23F
11/14 22:51, 23F
→
11/14 22:51, , 24F
11/14 22:51, 24F
→
11/14 22:51, , 25F
11/14 22:51, 25F
→
11/14 22:51, , 26F
11/14 22:51, 26F
→
11/14 22:52, , 27F
11/14 22:52, 27F
推
11/14 22:52, , 28F
11/14 22:52, 28F
→
11/14 22:52, , 29F
11/14 22:52, 29F
→
11/14 22:52, , 30F
11/14 22:52, 30F
→
11/14 22:54, , 31F
11/14 22:54, 31F
→
11/14 22:54, , 32F
11/14 22:54, 32F
推
11/14 22:54, , 33F
11/14 22:54, 33F
→
11/14 22:54, , 34F
11/14 22:54, 34F
推
11/14 22:54, , 35F
11/14 22:54, 35F
→
11/14 22:55, , 36F
11/14 22:55, 36F
→
11/14 22:56, , 37F
11/14 22:56, 37F
→
11/14 22:56, , 38F
11/14 22:56, 38F
→
11/14 22:56, , 39F
11/14 22:56, 39F
→
11/14 22:56, , 40F
11/14 22:56, 40F
→
11/14 22:57, , 41F
11/14 22:57, 41F
→
11/14 22:58, , 42F
11/14 22:58, 42F
我是覺得能夠低運球算是另一項技巧(and one?),以前看過J-Williams的運球教學影片,
說最好控制球的位置是運在膝蓋以上肩膀以下,自己運起來感覺也是這樣。
※ 編輯: thedan (222.251.12.167), 11/14/2014 23:08:28
推
11/14 23:02, , 43F
11/14 23:02, 43F
推
11/14 23:03, , 44F
11/14 23:03, 44F
→
11/14 23:03, , 45F
11/14 23:03, 45F
→
11/14 23:03, , 46F
11/14 23:03, 46F
推
11/14 23:05, , 47F
11/14 23:05, 47F
推
11/14 23:07, , 48F
11/14 23:07, 48F
推
11/14 23:15, , 49F
11/14 23:15, 49F
→
11/14 23:16, , 50F
11/14 23:16, 50F
→
11/14 23:16, , 51F
11/14 23:16, 51F
推
11/14 23:18, , 52F
11/14 23:18, 52F
→
11/14 23:21, , 53F
11/14 23:21, 53F
推
11/14 23:22, , 54F
11/14 23:22, 54F
推
11/14 23:35, , 55F
11/14 23:35, 55F
→
11/14 23:35, , 56F
11/14 23:35, 56F
→
11/14 23:35, , 57F
11/14 23:35, 57F
推
11/14 23:54, , 58F
11/14 23:54, 58F
Nash感覺都還比他兇+有魄力...
※ 編輯: thedan (222.251.12.167), 11/15/2014 00:10:06
推
11/15 00:24, , 59F
11/15 00:24, 59F
→
11/15 00:24, , 60F
11/15 00:24, 60F
推
11/15 00:28, , 61F
11/15 00:28, 61F
→
11/15 00:28, , 62F
11/15 00:28, 62F
推
11/15 00:29, , 63F
11/15 00:29, 63F
→
11/15 00:30, , 64F
11/15 00:30, 64F
→
11/15 00:33, , 65F
11/15 00:33, 65F
→
11/15 00:33, , 66F
11/15 00:33, 66F
推
11/15 00:48, , 67F
11/15 00:48, 67F
→
11/15 00:48, , 68F
11/15 00:48, 68F
→
11/15 00:49, , 69F
11/15 00:49, 69F
噓
11/15 01:12, , 70F
11/15 01:12, 70F
個人認知是,會叫運球爛是連自己帶球都不夠穩定,印象中豪是被包時才容易被抄球失誤
,才想說是否護球不力,畢竟照說NBA等級的控衛不應該會出現跟球不熟的情況。只ㄧ句
運球爛帶過是否有點草率?當然如果護球差是運球爛的原因也是能這樣說。
※ 編輯: thedan (222.251.12.167), 11/15/2014 01:42:17
推
11/15 07:47, , 71F
11/15 07:47, 71F
推
11/15 08:09, , 72F
11/15 08:09, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)