Re: [討論] Jordan Hill會比阿GG強嗎？
原文內容沒啥好討論 但是想談談看這個球員
Hill印象中前2年打替補打得很好 常常20min可以製造10+籃板
而且進攻籃板也很多 以替補來說效率蠻高的
但現在湖人問題是 把他拉到先發 而且還是中鋒
Hill身材在大前鋒合格 但在中鋒絕對不行
而且Hill之所以之前段時間能搶很多籃板
很大一部份原因是因為 他很拚
以前有看湖人比賽都知道 他會一個人在裡面一直跳一直跳
即使是 long rebound 也會跳出去拚搶 算是拼命三郎
尤其是那陣子Gasol都站著搶 更凸顯他的拼命
由於本身技術不好 本來只是個浪人板凳 但是因為夠拚
數據也有拚出來 漸漸獲得教練團訓練 算是苦力球員
但在湖人的禁區荒中 他必須先發 而且要中鋒 又要上場時間長
打中鋒比較難像大前鋒那樣跑來跑去 因為你要負責協防
尤其是boooooooo防守能力又弱 更何況一場比賽上場35min不可能一直跳
這應該算是他現在的困擾 就是不能再做高效率的搶板
不過還好 中距離有長出來 算是不錯了 (雖然姿勢不怎麼好看XD)
在湖人這陣容 就他跟ED可以打C (別跟我說沙揆 這傢伙打5分鐘都嫌多)
我是真的覺得可以讓ED先發 ED進攻不貪求 會乖乖等球來再打 但必須控制犯規
而Hill可以打先發PF或是替補內線 可以是假替補真先發 上場時間跟Lin錯開就好
(真的覺得他蠻歧視Lin 死都不幫他擋 不然就擋一下就走 )
只能說 我湖禁區堪慮 真的是 蜀中無大將 廖化當先鋒阿~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.185.130.120
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1415634085.A.BDF.html
→
11/10 23:42, , 1F
11/10 23:42, 1F
推
11/10 23:43, , 2F
11/10 23:43, 2F
噓
11/10 23:45, , 3F
11/10 23:45, 3F
推
11/10 23:45, , 4F
11/10 23:45, 4F
推
11/10 23:46, , 5F
11/10 23:46, 5F
→
11/10 23:46, , 6F
11/10 23:46, 6F
推
11/10 23:46, , 7F
11/10 23:46, 7F
推
11/10 23:46, , 8F
11/10 23:46, 8F
→
11/10 23:47, , 9F
11/10 23:47, 9F
→
11/10 23:47, , 10F
11/10 23:47, 10F
→
11/10 23:47, , 11F
11/10 23:47, 11F
推
11/10 23:48, , 12F
11/10 23:48, 12F
→
11/10 23:48, , 13F
11/10 23:48, 13F
推
11/10 23:50, , 14F
11/10 23:50, 14F
推
11/10 23:52, , 15F
11/10 23:52, 15F
推
11/10 23:52, , 16F
11/10 23:52, 16F
推
11/10 23:52, , 17F
11/10 23:52, 17F
推
11/10 23:53, , 18F
11/10 23:53, 18F
→
11/10 23:53, , 19F
11/10 23:53, 19F
→
11/10 23:54, , 20F
11/10 23:54, 20F
推
11/10 23:54, , 21F
11/10 23:54, 21F
推
11/10 23:55, , 22F
11/10 23:55, 22F
推
11/10 23:55, , 23F
11/10 23:55, 23F
→
11/10 23:55, , 24F
11/10 23:55, 24F
→
11/10 23:56, , 25F
11/10 23:56, 25F
推
11/10 23:57, , 26F
11/10 23:57, 26F
推
11/10 23:57, , 27F
11/10 23:57, 27F
噓
11/11 00:00, , 28F
11/11 00:00, 28F
推
11/11 00:00, , 29F
11/11 00:00, 29F
→
11/11 00:01, , 30F
11/11 00:01, 30F
→
11/11 00:01, , 31F
11/11 00:01, 31F
→
11/11 00:01, , 32F
11/11 00:01, 32F
推
11/11 00:02, , 33F
11/11 00:02, 33F
推
11/11 00:04, , 34F
11/11 00:04, 34F
推
11/11 00:06, , 35F
11/11 00:06, 35F
→
11/11 00:06, , 36F
11/11 00:06, 36F
→
11/11 00:06, , 37F
11/11 00:06, 37F
→
11/11 00:07, , 38F
11/11 00:07, 38F
噓
11/11 00:10, , 39F
11/11 00:10, 39F
推
11/11 00:11, , 40F
11/11 00:11, 40F
→
11/11 00:12, , 41F
11/11 00:12, 41F
→
11/11 00:14, , 42F
11/11 00:14, 42F
→
11/11 00:14, , 43F
11/11 00:14, 43F
→
11/11 00:14, , 44F
11/11 00:14, 44F
噓
11/11 00:16, , 45F
11/11 00:16, 45F
推
11/11 00:19, , 46F
11/11 00:19, 46F
噓
11/11 00:25, , 47F
11/11 00:25, 47F
推
11/11 00:44, , 48F
11/11 00:44, 48F
推
11/11 00:47, , 49F
11/11 00:47, 49F
→
11/11 00:47, , 50F
11/11 00:47, 50F
推
11/11 00:49, , 51F
11/11 00:49, 51F
→
11/11 00:49, , 52F
11/11 00:49, 52F
推
11/11 00:53, , 53F
11/11 00:53, 53F
推
11/11 00:57, , 54F
11/11 00:57, 54F
噓
11/11 00:59, , 55F
11/11 00:59, 55F
→
11/11 00:59, , 56F
11/11 00:59, 56F
推
11/11 01:03, , 57F
11/11 01:03, 57F
推
11/11 01:08, , 58F
11/11 01:08, 58F
推
11/11 01:10, , 59F
11/11 01:10, 59F
推
11/11 01:15, , 60F
11/11 01:15, 60F
→
11/11 01:16, , 61F
11/11 01:16, 61F
推
11/11 01:17, , 62F
11/11 01:17, 62F
→
11/11 01:18, , 63F
11/11 01:18, 63F
→
11/11 01:18, , 64F
11/11 01:18, 64F
推
11/11 01:42, , 65F
11/11 01:42, 65F
→
11/11 01:43, , 66F
11/11 01:43, 66F
噓
11/11 02:05, , 67F
11/11 02:05, 67F
→
11/11 02:43, , 68F
11/11 02:43, 68F
→
11/11 02:44, , 69F
11/11 02:44, 69F
→
11/11 02:44, , 70F
11/11 02:44, 70F
推
11/11 03:31, , 71F
11/11 03:31, 71F
噓
11/11 03:43, , 72F
11/11 03:43, 72F
推
11/11 04:01, , 73F
11/11 04:01, 73F
→
11/11 04:02, , 74F
11/11 04:02, 74F
推
11/11 06:42, , 75F
11/11 06:42, 75F
噓
11/11 08:07, , 76F
11/11 08:07, 76F
噓
11/11 08:36, , 77F
11/11 08:36, 77F
噓
11/11 08:48, , 78F
11/11 08:48, 78F
噓
11/11 10:19, , 79F
11/11 10:19, 79F
噓
11/11 11:53, , 80F
11/11 11:53, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇)：