[討論] Kyrie Irving 是不是更適合湖人隊?
幾場騎士的比賽看下來後,
發現Kyrie Irving 還滿適合缺乏戰術 卻強烈需要有得分點的隊伍
但在騎士現在隊伍 個位置皆不缺得分點的狀況下
大大限制了他的發展
以陣容看來, 他是不是更適合湖人隊
目前的湖人隊 除了KOBE外 需要的是 自打自幹的隊友
而林書豪的得分 是需要戰術的配合
叫他自己運一運 衝進去亂幹亂投 他也做不出來...
如果林書豪跟Kyrie Irving 互換球隊
會不會是對彼此陣容 最有效化的運用
林書豪愛打戰術愛打組織 可以跟LBJ LOVE 米粉頭 打打陣地
Kyrie Irving愛自已運自己打掉 可以跟KOBE 輪流拿球卯起來投
況且KOBE說過 如果隊友硬不起來 無法比他更有霸氣 他就會輾過隊友
這麼看來 Kyrie Irving 是不是湖人的解??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.220.148
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1415266947.A.B74.html
→
11/06 17:43, , 1F
11/06 17:43, 1F
→
11/06 17:43, , 2F
11/06 17:43, 2F
→
11/06 17:43, , 3F
11/06 17:43, 3F
噓
11/06 17:43, , 4F
11/06 17:43, 4F
推
11/06 17:44, , 5F
11/06 17:44, 5F
→
11/06 17:44, , 6F
11/06 17:44, 6F
推
11/06 17:44, , 7F
11/06 17:44, 7F
推
11/06 17:45, , 8F
11/06 17:45, 8F
推
11/06 17:46, , 9F
11/06 17:46, 9F
推
11/06 17:46, , 10F
11/06 17:46, 10F
推
11/06 17:48, , 11F
11/06 17:48, 11F
噓
11/06 17:48, , 12F
11/06 17:48, 12F
推
11/06 17:49, , 13F
11/06 17:49, 13F
推
11/06 17:49, , 14F
11/06 17:49, 14F
→
11/06 17:50, , 15F
11/06 17:50, 15F
→
11/06 17:50, , 16F
11/06 17:50, 16F
推
11/06 17:50, , 17F
11/06 17:50, 17F
→
11/06 17:50, , 18F
11/06 17:50, 18F
→
11/06 17:51, , 19F
11/06 17:51, 19F
→
11/06 17:51, , 20F
11/06 17:51, 20F
→
11/06 17:52, , 21F
11/06 17:52, 21F
→
11/06 17:52, , 22F
11/06 17:52, 22F
推
11/06 17:52, , 23F
11/06 17:52, 23F
→
11/06 17:53, , 24F
11/06 17:53, 24F
→
11/06 17:54, , 25F
11/06 17:54, 25F
推
11/06 17:54, , 26F
11/06 17:54, 26F
推
11/06 17:54, , 27F
11/06 17:54, 27F
→
11/06 17:59, , 28F
11/06 17:59, 28F
→
11/06 18:00, , 29F
11/06 18:00, 29F
→
11/06 18:03, , 30F
11/06 18:03, 30F
推
11/06 18:12, , 31F
11/06 18:12, 31F
推
11/06 18:12, , 32F
11/06 18:12, 32F
推
11/06 18:12, , 33F
11/06 18:12, 33F
→
11/06 18:15, , 34F
11/06 18:15, 34F
→
11/06 18:18, , 35F
11/06 18:18, 35F
推
11/06 18:20, , 36F
11/06 18:20, 36F
噓
11/06 18:24, , 37F
11/06 18:24, 37F
→
11/06 18:32, , 38F
11/06 18:32, 38F
→
11/06 18:32, , 39F
11/06 18:32, 39F
推
11/06 18:35, , 40F
11/06 18:35, 40F
噓
11/06 18:39, , 41F
11/06 18:39, 41F
推
11/06 18:39, , 42F
11/06 18:39, 42F
→
11/06 18:40, , 43F
11/06 18:40, 43F
→
11/06 18:51, , 44F
11/06 18:51, 44F
→
11/06 18:53, , 45F
11/06 18:53, 45F
推
11/06 18:55, , 46F
11/06 18:55, 46F
推
11/06 18:57, , 47F
11/06 18:57, 47F
推
11/06 19:03, , 48F
11/06 19:03, 48F
→
11/06 19:03, , 49F
11/06 19:03, 49F
噓
11/06 19:20, , 50F
11/06 19:20, 50F
噓
11/06 19:25, , 51F
11/06 19:25, 51F
噓
11/06 19:26, , 52F
11/06 19:26, 52F
→
11/06 19:39, , 53F
11/06 19:39, 53F
→
11/06 19:39, , 54F
11/06 19:39, 54F
推
11/06 19:41, , 55F
11/06 19:41, 55F
推
11/06 19:57, , 56F
11/06 19:57, 56F
推
11/06 20:28, , 57F
11/06 20:28, 57F
推
11/06 20:38, , 58F
11/06 20:38, 58F
推
11/06 20:58, , 59F
11/06 20:58, 59F
推
11/06 22:21, , 60F
11/06 22:21, 60F
噓
11/06 22:41, , 61F
11/06 22:41, 61F
噓
11/06 23:21, , 62F
11/06 23:21, 62F
推
11/06 23:22, , 63F
11/06 23:22, 63F
推
11/07 01:25, , 64F
11/07 01:25, 64F
→
11/07 09:51, , 65F
11/07 09:51, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):