[心得] KOBE為何不培養Sacre為冠軍中鋒?
綜觀Kobe所處的湖人隊,唯一的奪冠方程式就是擁有優質長人
不論是歐尼爾也好,或者是拜嫩+蓋索雙塔也好,能跟科比這種球霸
性格相符的陣容一定要擁有優質長人幫忙撿子彈跟補籃。
先不要說甚麼搶劫式的季中交易了,從湖人禁區球員來看,Hill+Boozer
根本太矮也不是那塊冠軍中鋒的料,但別忘了,還有一名身高7尺且身材厚
實的中鋒:Robert Sacre,今天我看了湖人-勇士直播,發現他真的淺力無窮
第二節一上場就來一顆排球般的補籃,那柔軟的手感真是技驚全場。
隨後又往籃框嘗試爆扣,雖然沒進但霸氣十足,頗有當年小鯊魚的味道,
況且,今年他也才25歲,還有很大的進步空間,更何況他也有穩定的中距離。
我想,與其訓練書豪成為冠軍控衛,不如先訓練Sacre成為冠軍中鋒吧,
當年拜嫩不也是從自傲的屁孩開始成長的嗎?相信在老大的魔鬼訓練下
Sacre一定會有突破性的成長的,相信到時候Kobe在添第六冠也不是難事了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.186.176
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1414926019.A.1A0.html
推
11/02 19:01, , 1F
11/02 19:01, 1F
噓
11/02 19:02, , 2F
11/02 19:02, 2F
推
11/02 19:02, , 3F
11/02 19:02, 3F
→
11/02 19:03, , 4F
11/02 19:03, 4F
→
11/02 19:03, , 5F
11/02 19:03, 5F
推
11/02 19:04, , 6F
11/02 19:04, 6F
推
11/02 19:05, , 7F
11/02 19:05, 7F
推
11/02 19:05, , 8F
11/02 19:05, 8F
噓
11/02 19:06, , 9F
11/02 19:06, 9F
→
11/02 19:07, , 10F
11/02 19:07, 10F
推
11/02 19:07, , 11F
11/02 19:07, 11F
推
11/02 19:07, , 12F
11/02 19:07, 12F
→
11/02 19:07, , 13F
11/02 19:07, 13F
→
11/02 19:08, , 14F
11/02 19:08, 14F
→
11/02 19:08, , 15F
11/02 19:08, 15F
推
11/02 19:08, , 16F
11/02 19:08, 16F
噓
11/02 19:09, , 17F
11/02 19:09, 17F
→
11/02 19:09, , 18F
11/02 19:09, 18F
→
11/02 19:09, , 19F
11/02 19:09, 19F
→
11/02 19:09, , 20F
11/02 19:09, 20F
推
11/02 19:10, , 21F
11/02 19:10, 21F
推
11/02 19:10, , 22F
11/02 19:10, 22F
噓
11/02 19:10, , 23F
11/02 19:10, 23F
推
11/02 19:10, , 24F
11/02 19:10, 24F
推
11/02 19:11, , 25F
11/02 19:11, 25F
→
11/02 19:11, , 26F
11/02 19:11, 26F
→
11/02 19:12, , 27F
11/02 19:12, 27F
→
11/02 19:13, , 28F
11/02 19:13, 28F
→
11/02 19:13, , 29F
11/02 19:13, 29F
推
11/02 19:13, , 30F
11/02 19:13, 30F
推
11/02 19:14, , 31F
11/02 19:14, 31F
→
11/02 19:14, , 32F
11/02 19:14, 32F
推
11/02 19:14, , 33F
11/02 19:14, 33F
→
11/02 19:15, , 34F
11/02 19:15, 34F
噓
11/02 19:15, , 35F
11/02 19:15, 35F
推
11/02 19:16, , 36F
11/02 19:16, 36F
推
11/02 19:16, , 37F
11/02 19:16, 37F
噓
11/02 19:21, , 38F
11/02 19:21, 38F
噓
11/02 19:21, , 39F
11/02 19:21, 39F
推
11/02 19:23, , 40F
11/02 19:23, 40F
噓
11/02 19:23, , 41F
11/02 19:23, 41F
推
11/02 19:26, , 42F
11/02 19:26, 42F
→
11/02 19:28, , 43F
11/02 19:28, 43F
→
11/02 19:29, , 44F
11/02 19:29, 44F
推
11/02 19:29, , 45F
11/02 19:29, 45F
推
11/02 19:34, , 46F
11/02 19:34, 46F
推
11/02 19:36, , 47F
11/02 19:36, 47F
推
11/02 19:36, , 48F
11/02 19:36, 48F
推
11/02 19:40, , 49F
11/02 19:40, 49F
→
11/02 19:40, , 50F
11/02 19:40, 50F
噓
11/02 19:43, , 51F
11/02 19:43, 51F
推
11/02 19:47, , 52F
11/02 19:47, 52F
→
11/02 19:54, , 53F
11/02 19:54, 53F
→
11/02 19:54, , 54F
11/02 19:54, 54F
噓
11/02 19:55, , 55F
11/02 19:55, 55F
噓
11/02 19:59, , 56F
11/02 19:59, 56F
推
11/02 20:02, , 57F
11/02 20:02, 57F
推
11/02 20:06, , 58F
11/02 20:06, 58F
→
11/02 20:07, , 59F
11/02 20:07, 59F
→
11/02 20:13, , 60F
11/02 20:13, 60F
噓
11/02 20:14, , 61F
11/02 20:14, 61F
推
11/02 20:15, , 62F
11/02 20:15, 62F
噓
11/02 20:17, , 63F
11/02 20:17, 63F
推
11/02 20:31, , 64F
11/02 20:31, 64F
→
11/02 21:48, , 65F
11/02 21:48, 65F
→
11/02 22:46, , 66F
11/02 22:46, 66F
噓
11/02 23:18, , 67F
11/02 23:18, 67F
噓
11/02 23:30, , 68F
11/02 23:30, 68F
→
11/02 23:30, , 69F
11/02 23:30, 69F
推
11/03 00:06, , 70F
11/03 00:06, 70F
→
11/03 00:07, , 71F
11/03 00:07, 71F
噓
11/03 02:21, , 72F
11/03 02:21, 72F
推
11/03 03:36, , 73F
11/03 03:36, 73F
噓
11/03 03:43, , 74F
11/03 03:43, 74F
推
11/03 16:07, , 75F
11/03 16:07, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):