Re: [新聞] 詹姆斯抒情長文原來是代筆騎士不被祝福

看板NBA作者neak (neak)時間10年前 (2014/07/13 15:45)推噓36(37推 1噓 10→)

留言48則, 43人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

這個是大家都讀中文翻譯才會以為說是本人寫得吧! 如果你有看原文 http://www.si.com/nba/2014/07/11/lebron-james-cleveland-cavaliers LeBron: I'm coming back to Cleveland by LeBron James (as told to Lee Jenkins) 文章作者就說是 LeBron James 告訴 Lee Jenkins，這很明顯的就是說，LeBron 口述， Jenkins 代筆，連圖上都有說是 Lee Jenkins 寫的，他也是第一個在 Twitter 上公布的人。 https://twitter.com/SI_LeeJenkins/status/487631865403035650 Lee Jenkins @ 9:17 AM - 11 Jul 2014 LeBron: "I'm coming home." @SINow exclusive in the words of @KingJames: http://bit.ly/1zu0IHz 從頭都沒說是 LeBron 親手寫的，怎麼會到現在會說有『傳言』是找人代筆。人家光明正大寫在那，講得好像偷偷摸摸的。還有這篇中文報導跟英文報導有點差距。這裡是關於 SI 怎麼拿到獨家的報導。 http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/2014/07/how_sis_lee_jenkins_got_the_bi.html "I almost feel guilty talking about this because all the credit goes to Lee Jenkins," Stone said. "He's the one who wanted to do this story for a long time, he made it happen. It's a remarkable coup for him." It germinated from an idea to write about what James would do during this monumental off-season. Conversations with people around James eventually led to a proposition a week ago: Jenkins could be the one to write James' decision. Jenkins was so concerned the story might fall through, however, that he only wrote an email to Stone saying that he wanted to do a first-person story. 這裡是說 Jenkins 一直想以第一人稱的文章，在這重要的休季期間。身為記者的他跑去跟LBJ身邊的人商量要採訪 LBJ ，上個禮拜有人提議說那不然叫　Jenkins　操刀 LBJ 這次的『決定』好了。為了防止消息曝光，導致他拿不到大獨家，他沒跟他編輯講細節，只寄個 Email 說要寫個第一人稱的故事。 (他應該是那種牌子很大的專欄作家，想寫什麼寫什麼，不是那種每天被逼著報導比賽幾比幾誰贏了之類流水帳記者。) Still, Jenkins remained cautious until he flew to Las Vegas on Wednesday, met with James on Thursday, and knew the decision of the newest Cavalier. No one at SI knew James' choice until 10:30 a.m. Friday, however, when Jenkins' story landed in the office. For almost two hours, only about eight people knew of James' decision. That, Stone conceded, was the only promise SI made in agreeing to write James' story. "We certainly didn't want a leak," Stone said. "One condition was placed on us, and that was our internal discretion." Jenkins earned the right to tell the story in part because of the trust he engenders in his sources, Stone said. 他星期三飛到 Vegas ，星期四採訪，星期五早上 10:30 送文章到 SI辦公室。之後的兩小時只有八個人知道。他編輯說這是ＳＩ答應LBJ 的唯一條件，就是絕對的守密。 ------------------------------------------------------------------- (這很明顯是要打ESPN 臉，四年前是ESPN 的前員工提議跟牽線 LBJ 在ESPN 作『決定』特別節目。結果節目還沒撥 ESPN 網站就開始說有可靠消息指出 LBJ要去熱火。然後　ESPN 特別節目收視率高，結果因為沒有預期到會有這麼嚴重的反感，ESPN 裝作這一切跟他們沒關係，ESPN 還連續好幾年放任他們的作家記者說在電視上宣布是多麼愚蠢的事，是如何背後捅 Cleveland 球迷一刀。這明明就是你們提議，你們挖坑的。所以這次ESPN 許多號稱消息靈通的記者，完全沒收到任何消息，大獨家被敵營 SI 拿走就不意外了。) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 24.205.130.25 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1405237550.A.E6B.html

推

signm

07/13 15:48, , 1^F

07/13 15:48, 1^F

推

sisik

07/13 15:49, , 2^F

07/13 15:49, 2^F

推

philxiao

07/13 15:52, , 3^F

07/13 15:52, 3^F

Sports Illustrated 是歷史悠久的周刊。 ESPN 是轉播電視台，後來有出月刊跟有著強大的網站，養了很多網路記者。 Sports Illustrated 雖然也有網站但文章都是專欄，他們也有很多專欄作家會出貼身採訪的書，像太陽隊有本 7 Seconds or Less 就是 SI專欄作家貼身採防一年寫的書。林書豪還在哈佛時ＳＩ就寫過關於他很長篇的專欄了。很棒的文章。兩邊網站都超多記者，運動周刊網站主要就這兩個。但 ESPN 比較譁眾取寵，加上每天的賽事總結 (不過都是美聯社新聞)。SI 深度報導比較多。 ※ 編輯: neak (24.205.130.25), 07/13/2014 16:03:04

→

chou8564

07/13 15:53, , 4^F

07/13 15:53, 4^F

→

blur13

07/13 15:53, , 5^F

07/13 15:53, 5^F

→

chou8564

07/13 15:53, , 6^F

07/13 15:53, 6^F