Re: [新聞] 林書豪抵達洛杉磯 民眾獻花歡迎
: → BadGame :湖人球探報告 林吧翻譯 http://tinyurl.com/pamgnuc 07/13 14:03
ClubLakers.com 原文連結 http://ppt.cc/nXNG
原文很長,基本上文章內容只要是有在跟球賽的人印象上不會差太多,
我只特地截出防守部分的評論,因為防守最難去量化也很容易流於印象派.
On defense, Lin actually rates very well. After adjusting by position, Lin
was 77th out of 430 NBA players by defensive RPM the past year, a very good
mark; 82games also agrees with this idea, with the Rockets being nearly three
points defensively with Lin on the court. nbawowy also agrees, with the
Rockets being 0.01 points per possession better defensively with Lin on the
court. Lin-based lineups defended layups better by nearly three percent,
while defending threes better by 0.6%. These markers are not a fluke, given
that Lin also played good team defense during the time of Linsanity. Lin is
also an excellent shotblocker by position (7th out of 63 point guards),
continuing excellent rates that were seen in college and illustrating his
savvy in leveraging his height to make up for lack of length. Still, Lin's
imposed-athletic markers really, really tailed off this past season, with a
defensive rebound rate in the bottom fifth of all NBA point guards. Lin put
up excellent rebounding numbers in college and had put up a top 15 rebound
rate in New York. After years of top-notch thievery in college and in his
first three years in the league, Lin was also in the bottom third in steal
rate this past year, but this might normalize back to its past levels, and
considering the very good defense he might have played more contain-level
defense the past year.
在防守端,林的表現其實非常優秀.在對他不穩定的出場位置和時間(這邊指的應該
是火箭時期要輪流扛1 2號衛)進行必要的數據調整後,林去年的防守效率可以排在
全聯盟430名球員中的第77位.對火箭上個賽季的數據分析也可以證明這點,林在場
上時,火箭場均失分降低3分.NBA數據也表明林在場上時,火箭每回合失分減少0.01
分(0.01PPP).林在場上時,火箭的防守效率提升約3%,同時使得對手三分命中率下降
0.6%.這些數據沒有誇大其詞,即使在林來瘋時期,林依然表現了很好的協防能力.
在控衛中,林的火鍋也十分突出(聯盟63名PG中排名第7).優秀的防守效率表明林用
他的球場智商來彌補他臂展不足的缺點.但即使如此,林在上賽季於防守端的表現
和他大學時期相比還是縮水了些.上賽季林在爭搶防守籃板效率處於聯盟控衛下游
但在大學時期的林卻是個籃板好手.即使在紐約時期,林的籃板效率依然排在控衛
前15名.林在大學和紐約時期的抄截也十分搶眼,但在上個賽季他的抄截效率也只
排在控衛中的倒數第三.考慮到他將會在未來獲得比火箭時期更明確的防守任務,
這些下降的數據有可能會回升.
Lin was better defending point guards than shooting guards, holding down
their scoring rate by nearly five points while reducing the efficiency by
nearly ten percent, and in general he allows opposing guards to score. The
ideal scenario to prevent crossmatching, and optimizing Lin, would create an
offense centralized around him to allow him to play point guard at a
reasonable level, so he can defend point guards well while being a positive
on the team's offense. Lin appears to really, really elevate his game on all
facets when he has the ball in his hands, and this even extends to rebounding
and stealing the ball. A Lin at past year's level would require
crossmatching--a SG offensively, and a PG defensively.
在防守端林對位PG的表現比對位SG要好.在對位PG時,林對位的球員得分會下降大約
5分,效率會下降至10%之譜.但當林面對錯位防守時,他的對手往往能憑藉身高優勢
取分.林應當在球隊中充當控衛角色來激發他的進攻潛力同時發揮他的防守優勢,
所有數據都顯示出,在擁有球權時林的表現會有大量的提升,甚至包含了籃板和抄截.
從林上賽季的表現來看,林在進攻端應當成為攻擊箭頭,而在防守端應該讓他去對位
對方的PG.
===
以上是來自湖人官網的球探報告,別再說林迷造謠印象派惹,
至於擔心Lin防守表現的人看到這篇文章應該也能一定程度釋懷.
林的防守到底如何很難量化,但至少是不需要讓球隊擔心的點.
加上林身高6"3 體重200磅的身材,在PG這點上是頗為吃香的,
能讓Lin好好的在PG位置上發揮,這個點的防守是可以讓球隊信任的.
http://bbs.hupu.com/9942934.html
這裡有大陸虎撲的完整翻譯,還帶些動圖,
看有沒有人願意簡翻繁後貼上來,字太多了有點懶,
而且有些翻譯部分需要做一些潤飾,不然文章有部分看起來會有些突兀.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.136.165
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1405234141.A.D50.html
→
07/13 14:49, , 1F
07/13 14:49, 1F
其實我也不是PO給那些腦子已經孔固力的林酸看,主要是Lin今年要去湖人了,
湖迷有些人擔心林的防守會不會給湖人後場雪上加霜,所以我是PO給對此有疑慮
的湖迷看的,不敢說Lin防守一定多好多棒,但相信會給湖人後場帶來正面的幫助.
推
07/13 14:51, , 2F
07/13 14:51, 2F
→
07/13 14:51, , 3F
07/13 14:51, 3F
推
07/13 14:51, , 4F
07/13 14:51, 4F
推
07/13 14:52, , 5F
07/13 14:52, 5F
→
07/13 14:53, , 6F
07/13 14:53, 6F
推
07/13 14:53, , 7F
07/13 14:53, 7F
→
07/13 14:53, , 8F
07/13 14:53, 8F
推
07/13 14:53, , 9F
07/13 14:53, 9F
推
07/13 14:53, , 10F
07/13 14:53, 10F
→
07/13 14:53, , 11F
07/13 14:53, 11F
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.136.165), 07/13/2014 14:56:12
→
07/13 14:54, , 12F
07/13 14:54, 12F
推
07/13 14:54, , 13F
07/13 14:54, 13F
推
07/13 14:54, , 14F
07/13 14:54, 14F
→
07/13 14:54, , 15F
07/13 14:54, 15F
→
07/13 14:54, , 16F
07/13 14:54, 16F
→
07/13 14:55, , 17F
07/13 14:55, 17F
推
07/13 14:55, , 18F
07/13 14:55, 18F
→
07/13 14:55, , 19F
07/13 14:55, 19F
推
07/13 14:55, , 20F
07/13 14:55, 20F
→
07/13 14:56, , 21F
07/13 14:56, 21F
推
07/13 14:56, , 22F
07/13 14:56, 22F
推
07/13 14:56, , 23F
07/13 14:56, 23F
推
07/13 14:56, , 24F
07/13 14:56, 24F
推
07/13 14:57, , 25F
07/13 14:57, 25F
→
07/13 14:57, , 26F
07/13 14:57, 26F
推
07/13 14:58, , 27F
07/13 14:58, 27F
推
07/13 14:58, , 28F
07/13 14:58, 28F
→
07/13 14:59, , 29F
07/13 14:59, 29F
推
07/13 14:59, , 30F
07/13 14:59, 30F
推
07/13 15:02, , 31F
07/13 15:02, 31F
推
07/13 15:02, , 32F
07/13 15:02, 32F
推
07/13 15:02, , 33F
07/13 15:02, 33F
→
07/13 15:03, , 34F
07/13 15:03, 34F
推
07/13 15:03, , 35F
07/13 15:03, 35F
推
07/13 15:03, , 36F
07/13 15:03, 36F
推
07/13 15:04, , 37F
07/13 15:04, 37F
還有 88 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
07/13 17:51, , 126F
07/13 17:51, 126F
→
07/13 17:52, , 127F
07/13 17:52, 127F
→
07/13 17:52, , 128F
07/13 17:52, 128F
→
07/13 17:53, , 129F
07/13 17:53, 129F
→
07/13 17:53, , 130F
07/13 17:53, 130F
→
07/13 17:54, , 131F
07/13 17:54, 131F
推
07/13 18:08, , 132F
07/13 18:08, 132F
→
07/13 18:09, , 133F
07/13 18:09, 133F
推
07/13 18:16, , 134F
07/13 18:16, 134F
推
07/13 18:20, , 135F
07/13 18:20, 135F
推
07/13 18:20, , 136F
07/13 18:20, 136F
→
07/13 18:21, , 137F
07/13 18:21, 137F
推
07/13 18:27, , 138F
07/13 18:27, 138F
推
07/13 18:42, , 139F
07/13 18:42, 139F
推
07/13 18:58, , 140F
07/13 18:58, 140F
→
07/13 18:59, , 141F
07/13 18:59, 141F
→
07/13 18:59, , 142F
07/13 18:59, 142F
推
07/13 19:05, , 143F
07/13 19:05, 143F
推
07/13 19:33, , 144F
07/13 19:33, 144F
推
07/13 20:20, , 145F
07/13 20:20, 145F
推
07/13 20:24, , 146F
07/13 20:24, 146F
推
07/13 20:44, , 147F
07/13 20:44, 147F
→
07/13 20:44, , 148F
07/13 20:44, 148F
→
07/13 20:44, , 149F
07/13 20:44, 149F
推
07/13 20:48, , 150F
07/13 20:48, 150F
→
07/13 20:48, , 151F
07/13 20:48, 151F
推
07/13 20:50, , 152F
07/13 20:50, 152F
推
07/13 21:06, , 153F
07/13 21:06, 153F
→
07/13 21:11, , 154F
07/13 21:11, 154F
推
07/13 21:22, , 155F
07/13 21:22, 155F
推
07/13 21:32, , 156F
07/13 21:32, 156F
推
07/13 21:38, , 157F
07/13 21:38, 157F
推
07/13 21:45, , 158F
07/13 21:45, 158F
推
07/13 22:14, , 159F
07/13 22:14, 159F
推
07/13 22:16, , 160F
07/13 22:16, 160F
推
07/13 22:18, , 161F
07/13 22:18, 161F
→
07/14 02:34, , 162F
07/14 02:34, 162F
推
07/14 11:10, , 163F
07/14 11:10, 163F
→
07/14 18:25, , 164F
07/14 18:25, 164F
推
07/14 21:44, , 165F
07/14 21:44, 165F
討論串 (同標題文章)