Re: [問題] 當年David Robinson
※ 引述《sleeeve (赴美留學的日子...)》之銘言:
: 遙想很多年前馬刺奪冠,那年報紙體育頭條就是馬刺雙塔David Robinson VS Tim Duncan
: 兩個又高又強的雙塔真的是奪冠利器!! (聽說Robinson律己很嚴,以聖經為依歸,讓球隊
: 的紀律很好,老大哥的風範真是令人敬佩!,也造就馬刺穩重內斂的風格,跟湖人剛好相反)
: 但現在的馬刺,似乎先發就Duncan最高,中鋒似乎也沒比Duncan高。
: 馬刺現在的內線是否跟當年David Robinson時期的內線弱一些呢?
: 當年的馬刺跟現在的馬刺比起來又如何呢?
單比禁區陣容的話
13-14
F/C Tim Duncan
F/C Tiago Splitter
C Matt Bonner
F Boris Diaw
C Aron Baynes
99-00
C David Robinson
F/C Tim Duncan
F/C Malik Rose
C Will Purdue (被酸應該改姓Vanderbilt的那個人)
(要算上偶爾代打四號位的老阿伯Jerome Kersey嗎?)
光正值青春的TD跟功能尚稱正常的大羅就贏一大截
相較之下,今年馬刺的外線火力大贏雙塔那年
命中率多5%(三成零三對三成五三),能出手的人還是當年的兩倍多
攻勢的活絡程度也大勝雙塔年(為了高齡的TD調整打法+後場侵略性更好)
內線比較弱但後場侵略性大勝
當年的先發後場是Avery Johnson跟Jaren Jackson,一個沒外線一個只能定點,
後者季後賽還被拔掉先發換Elie
三號位是腎鬥士一號Sean Elliott,當時的他防守已經跟不太上了
替補後場有腦衝Antonio Daniels跟膝蓋半殘的老鐵衛Terry Porter以及剩下冷箭功能的
Steve Kerr
若這兩支馬刺來打一場,個人覺得今年的馬刺勝率比較高,攻勢太活了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.85.224.121
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1402910648.A.96B.html
※ 編輯: imanikki (219.85.224.121), 06/16/2014 17:27:12
推
06/16 17:26, , 1F
06/16 17:26, 1F
→
06/16 17:26, , 2F
06/16 17:26, 2F
推
06/16 17:27, , 3F
06/16 17:27, 3F
推
06/16 17:28, , 4F
06/16 17:28, 4F
推
06/16 17:28, , 5F
06/16 17:28, 5F
推
06/16 17:30, , 6F
06/16 17:30, 6F
TD一比一就不用講了,靠么當年根本無敵
※ 編輯: imanikki (219.85.224.121), 06/16/2014 17:30:45
→
06/16 17:30, , 7F
06/16 17:30, 7F
噓
06/16 17:31, , 8F
06/16 17:31, 8F
→
06/16 17:32, , 9F
06/16 17:32, 9F
→
06/16 17:32, , 10F
06/16 17:32, 10F
→
06/16 17:32, , 11F
06/16 17:32, 11F
→
06/16 17:36, , 12F
06/16 17:36, 12F
→
06/16 17:37, , 13F
06/16 17:37, 13F
→
06/16 17:37, , 14F
06/16 17:37, 14F
噓
06/16 17:37, , 15F
06/16 17:37, 15F
→
06/16 17:37, , 16F
06/16 17:37, 16F
→
06/16 17:38, , 17F
06/16 17:38, 17F
→
06/16 17:38, , 18F
06/16 17:38, 18F
→
06/16 17:38, , 19F
06/16 17:38, 19F
推
06/16 17:39, , 20F
06/16 17:39, 20F
→
06/16 17:40, , 21F
06/16 17:40, 21F
→
06/16 17:41, , 22F
06/16 17:41, 22F
推
06/16 17:42, , 23F
06/16 17:42, 23F
→
06/16 17:47, , 24F
06/16 17:47, 24F
推
06/16 17:50, , 25F
06/16 17:50, 25F
→
06/16 17:53, , 26F
06/16 17:53, 26F
推
06/16 17:55, , 27F
06/16 17:55, 27F
→
06/16 17:56, , 28F
06/16 17:56, 28F
→
06/16 17:57, , 29F
06/16 17:57, 29F
噓
06/16 18:18, , 30F
06/16 18:18, 30F
→
06/16 18:18, , 31F
06/16 18:18, 31F
推
06/16 18:46, , 32F
06/16 18:46, 32F
推
06/16 18:54, , 33F
06/16 18:54, 33F
→
06/16 19:00, , 34F
06/16 19:00, 34F
推
06/16 19:06, , 35F
06/16 19:06, 35F
→
06/16 19:06, , 36F
06/16 19:06, 36F
→
06/16 19:49, , 37F
06/16 19:49, 37F
推
06/16 20:12, , 38F
06/16 20:12, 38F
→
06/16 21:40, , 39F
06/16 21:40, 39F
→
06/16 21:41, , 40F
06/16 21:41, 40F
推
06/16 21:43, , 41F
06/16 21:43, 41F
噓
06/16 21:59, , 42F
06/16 21:59, 42F
推
06/16 22:33, , 43F
06/16 22:33, 43F
推
06/17 01:19, , 44F
06/17 01:19, 44F
推
06/17 03:19, , 45F
06/17 03:19, 45F
推
06/17 09:46, , 46F
06/17 09:46, 46F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):