Re: [情報] 活塞想要回9號簽,卻不想拿出有價值的籌碼
推
05/23 09:19,
05/23 09:19
→
05/23 09:25,
05/23 09:25
→
05/23 09:26,
05/23 09:26
不知道大大您的「不錯」與「好貨」的定義是什麼
選雙塔的順位可是7跟9,可以比較2010年左右開始爛的爐主級隊伍
活塞 2010 #7 Greg Monroe
2011 #8 Brandon Knight
2012 #9 Andre Drummond
2013 #8 Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
騎士 2011 #1 KI
#4 Tristan Tompson
2012 #4 Dion Waiters
2013 #1 Anthony Bennett
巫師 2010 #1 John Wall
2011 #6 Jan Vesely
2012 #3 Bradley Beal
2013 #3 Otto Porter
山貓 2011 #7 Bismack Biyombo
#9 Kemba Walker
2012 #2 MKG
2013 #4 Cody Zeller
國王 2010 #5 DeMarcus Cousins
2011 #10 Jimmer Fredette (原本#7)
2012 #5 Thomos Robinson
2013 #7 Ben McLemore
同場加映:
灰狼 2010 #4 Wesley Johnson
2011 #2 Derrick Williams
結論:
選人好不好是要比較的,近四年活塞的順位總和是32,
結果選的跟總和10的騎士、13的巫師差不多,我想用「不錯」來形容是不為過的
第七順位還是能抽到不少「好貨」的,希望貴隊能好好選,不要再怪聯盟沒愛了
--
誰毀了雷吉˙米勒的冠軍?
1. 米高佐敦
2. 斯派克李
3. 慈世平(原阿泰)
4. 杰梅因奧尼爾
5. 泰夏安普林斯
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.37.111.223
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1400812789.A.554.html
→
05/23 10:43, , 1F
05/23 10:43, 1F
推
05/23 10:44, , 2F
05/23 10:44, 2F
推
05/23 10:44, , 3F
05/23 10:44, 3F
推
05/23 10:45, , 4F
05/23 10:45, 4F
推
05/23 10:46, , 5F
05/23 10:46, 5F
推
05/23 10:47, , 6F
05/23 10:47, 6F
推
05/23 10:47, , 7F
05/23 10:47, 7F
→
05/23 10:48, , 8F
05/23 10:48, 8F
推
05/23 10:49, , 9F
05/23 10:49, 9F
推
05/23 10:50, , 10F
05/23 10:50, 10F
→
05/23 10:52, , 11F
05/23 10:52, 11F
推
05/23 10:56, , 12F
05/23 10:56, 12F
推
05/23 10:58, , 13F
05/23 10:58, 13F
推
05/23 10:58, , 14F
05/23 10:58, 14F
→
05/23 10:59, , 15F
05/23 10:59, 15F
→
05/23 11:00, , 16F
05/23 11:00, 16F
→
05/23 11:00, , 17F
05/23 11:00, 17F
→
05/23 11:01, , 18F
05/23 11:01, 18F
→
05/23 11:01, , 19F
05/23 11:01, 19F
我不覺得我有「戰」,我只是提出名單給個看法而已。然後11、13年是弱選秀年,所以
四年內能以7跟9選到夢羅跟抓猛兩個人,可以說是不輸騎士、巫師那兩對高順位後場雙
槍了
※ 編輯: AccurateBell (114.37.111.223), 05/23/2014 11:10:58
→
05/23 11:05, , 20F
05/23 11:05, 20F
推
05/23 11:08, , 21F
05/23 11:08, 21F
→
05/23 11:12, , 22F
05/23 11:12, 22F
推
05/23 11:17, , 23F
05/23 11:17, 23F
→
05/23 11:17, , 24F
05/23 11:17, 24F
推
05/23 11:17, , 25F
05/23 11:17, 25F
推
05/23 11:17, , 26F
05/23 11:17, 26F
→
05/23 11:19, , 27F
05/23 11:19, 27F
→
05/23 11:21, , 28F
05/23 11:21, 28F
推
05/23 11:21, , 29F
05/23 11:21, 29F
推
05/23 11:24, , 30F
05/23 11:24, 30F
→
05/23 11:25, , 31F
05/23 11:25, 31F
推
05/23 11:36, , 32F
05/23 11:36, 32F
推
05/23 11:38, , 33F
05/23 11:38, 33F
推
05/23 11:38, , 34F
05/23 11:38, 34F
推
05/23 11:40, , 35F
05/23 11:40, 35F
推
05/23 12:05, , 36F
05/23 12:05, 36F
推
05/23 12:12, , 37F
05/23 12:12, 37F
推
05/23 12:15, , 38F
05/23 12:15, 38F
推
05/23 12:16, , 39F
05/23 12:16, 39F
→
05/23 12:17, , 40F
05/23 12:17, 40F
推
05/23 12:21, , 41F
05/23 12:21, 41F
→
05/23 12:22, , 42F
05/23 12:22, 42F
→
05/23 12:23, , 43F
05/23 12:23, 43F
→
05/23 12:25, , 44F
05/23 12:25, 44F
→
05/23 12:25, , 45F
05/23 12:25, 45F
推
05/23 12:28, , 46F
05/23 12:28, 46F
→
05/23 12:43, , 47F
05/23 12:43, 47F
推
05/23 12:46, , 48F
05/23 12:46, 48F
→
05/23 12:46, , 49F
05/23 12:46, 49F
推
05/23 12:48, , 50F
05/23 12:48, 50F
→
05/23 12:48, , 51F
05/23 12:48, 51F
推
05/23 12:52, , 52F
05/23 12:52, 52F
→
05/23 12:54, , 53F
05/23 12:54, 53F
推
05/23 13:00, , 54F
05/23 13:00, 54F
→
05/23 13:01, , 55F
05/23 13:01, 55F
推
05/23 13:03, , 56F
05/23 13:03, 56F
推
05/23 13:38, , 57F
05/23 13:38, 57F
推
05/23 16:52, , 58F
05/23 16:52, 58F
→
05/24 01:18, , 59F
05/24 01:18, 59F
→
05/24 01:18, , 60F
05/24 01:18, 60F
→
05/24 01:18, , 61F
05/24 01:18, 61F
→
05/24 10:08, , 62F
05/24 10:08, 62F
→
05/24 10:10, , 63F
05/24 10:10, 63F
→
05/24 10:12, , 64F
05/24 10:12, 64F
→
05/24 10:13, , 65F
05/24 10:13, 65F
→
05/24 10:13, , 66F
05/24 10:13, 66F
→
05/24 10:21, , 67F
05/24 10:21, 67F
→
05/24 10:22, , 68F
05/24 10:22, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):