Re: [討論] 請問KG是否主宰過籃壇?
KG當年真的超屌阿 我還買過他nike第一代 設計超爛
在灰狼的時候
活動力 機動力 在這個身高級距中 幾乎是無敵
若說 活動力/身材 比LBJ還厲害 你會相信嗎?
低位靈活的單打 還有後仰
真的超容易聯想到同時期的MJ
全場跑來跑去 超積極的 連撲球那些都是
有時候還布局三分絕殺哩
唯一缺點大概就中距離外火力弱了點
但光是他的後仰 我就覺得可以跟MJ一樣吃一輩子了
這不是主觀豪小
當時連PIP 都公開說過 KG應該打到後衛去 發揮會更強大 (現LBJ?)
你就知道天下第二人對他有多肯定 至少認為KG的身材/活動力足跟自己媲美
連NIKE都願意把第二代太空鞋出給他 (地位不輸penny)
到後期 大家都知道的
球隊定位 轉型 傳導居多了 體能 活動力也嚴重下滑 就...
KG在前鋒真的有主宰過聯盟 雙21也不是叫假的
只是TD當初被詬病的打法 被批評沒有KG積極的打法
到最後 沒想到卻是他生涯成就的關鍵 = ="
我也很期待看同樣從高中就開始打的LBJ 34歲後還能打成怎樣 XDDD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.253.192
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1399687278.A.750.html
→
05/10 10:03, , 1F
05/10 10:03, 1F
噓
05/10 10:04, , 2F
05/10 10:04, 2F
推
05/10 10:05, , 3F
05/10 10:05, 3F
喔對~ 我是覺得有關啦 t-mac也是天才型 結果也是不保
畢竟NBA強度差很多
→
05/10 10:06, , 4F
05/10 10:06, 4F
※ 編輯: osee (140.112.253.192), 05/10/2014 10:07:28
噓
05/10 10:06, , 5F
05/10 10:06, 5F
噓
05/10 10:07, , 6F
05/10 10:07, 6F
噓
05/10 10:07, , 7F
05/10 10:07, 7F
→
05/10 10:08, , 8F
05/10 10:08, 8F
→
05/10 10:08, , 9F
05/10 10:08, 9F
推
05/10 10:12, , 10F
05/10 10:12, 10F
→
05/10 10:13, , 11F
05/10 10:13, 11F
→
05/10 10:14, , 12F
05/10 10:14, 12F
→
05/10 10:15, , 13F
05/10 10:15, 13F
推
05/10 10:15, , 14F
05/10 10:15, 14F
噓
05/10 10:16, , 15F
05/10 10:16, 15F
→
05/10 10:17, , 16F
05/10 10:17, 16F
→
05/10 10:17, , 17F
05/10 10:17, 17F
→
05/10 10:19, , 18F
05/10 10:19, 18F
→
05/10 10:19, , 19F
05/10 10:19, 19F
推
05/10 10:20, , 20F
05/10 10:20, 20F
→
05/10 10:20, , 21F
05/10 10:20, 21F
→
05/10 10:21, , 22F
05/10 10:21, 22F
→
05/10 10:23, , 23F
05/10 10:23, 23F
噓
05/10 10:25, , 24F
05/10 10:25, 24F
→
05/10 10:26, , 25F
05/10 10:26, 25F
推
05/10 10:30, , 26F
05/10 10:30, 26F
→
05/10 10:30, , 27F
05/10 10:30, 27F
→
05/10 10:31, , 28F
05/10 10:31, 28F
→
05/10 10:31, , 29F
05/10 10:31, 29F
噓
05/10 10:33, , 30F
05/10 10:33, 30F
→
05/10 10:34, , 31F
05/10 10:34, 31F
噓
05/10 10:40, , 32F
05/10 10:40, 32F
→
05/10 10:40, , 33F
05/10 10:40, 33F
→
05/10 10:42, , 34F
05/10 10:42, 34F
→
05/10 10:42, , 35F
05/10 10:42, 35F
→
05/10 10:43, , 36F
05/10 10:43, 36F
→
05/10 10:43, , 37F
05/10 10:43, 37F
還有 34 則推文
→
05/10 14:14, , 72F
05/10 14:14, 72F
→
05/10 14:14, , 73F
05/10 14:14, 73F
→
05/10 14:20, , 74F
05/10 14:20, 74F
→
05/10 14:21, , 75F
05/10 14:21, 75F
→
05/10 14:21, , 76F
05/10 14:21, 76F
→
05/10 14:22, , 77F
05/10 14:22, 77F
→
05/10 14:22, , 78F
05/10 14:22, 78F
噓
05/10 14:28, , 79F
05/10 14:28, 79F
噓
05/10 14:32, , 80F
05/10 14:32, 80F
→
05/10 14:32, , 81F
05/10 14:32, 81F
→
05/10 14:34, , 82F
05/10 14:34, 82F
→
05/10 14:34, , 83F
05/10 14:34, 83F
噓
05/10 14:35, , 84F
05/10 14:35, 84F
推
05/10 14:36, , 85F
05/10 14:36, 85F
→
05/10 14:36, , 86F
05/10 14:36, 86F
→
05/10 14:37, , 87F
05/10 14:37, 87F
→
05/10 14:46, , 88F
05/10 14:46, 88F
→
05/10 14:48, , 89F
05/10 14:48, 89F
噓
05/10 14:51, , 90F
05/10 14:51, 90F
→
05/10 14:57, , 91F
05/10 14:57, 91F
→
05/10 15:39, , 92F
05/10 15:39, 92F
→
05/10 15:40, , 93F
05/10 15:40, 93F
→
05/10 15:41, , 94F
05/10 15:41, 94F
推
05/10 15:50, , 95F
05/10 15:50, 95F
→
05/10 15:54, , 96F
05/10 15:54, 96F
噓
05/10 17:26, , 97F
05/10 17:26, 97F
推
05/10 17:38, , 98F
05/10 17:38, 98F
噓
05/10 20:08, , 99F
05/10 20:08, 99F
→
05/10 20:09, , 100F
05/10 20:09, 100F
→
05/10 20:09, , 101F
05/10 20:09, 101F
→
05/10 20:09, , 102F
05/10 20:09, 102F
→
05/10 20:10, , 103F
05/10 20:10, 103F
→
05/10 20:10, , 104F
05/10 20:10, 104F
→
05/10 20:10, , 105F
05/10 20:10, 105F
→
05/10 20:11, , 106F
05/10 20:11, 106F
→
05/10 20:12, , 107F
05/10 20:12, 107F
推
05/10 20:50, , 108F
05/10 20:50, 108F
噓
05/10 22:40, , 109F
05/10 22:40, 109F
噓
05/10 23:31, , 110F
05/10 23:31, 110F
噓
05/28 02:11, , 111F
05/28 02:11, 111F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 18 之 18 篇):
討論
94
284
討論
-30
194
討論
94
326
討論
22
126
討論
36
105
討論
69
168
討論
36
125
討論
40
146