Re: [閒聊]鬍子的防守...這樣可以算是聯盟第一的SG?已回收
我記得曾經有看過評論
為什麼有些球員進攻和防守很兩極
幾個比較有名的例子就屬於kobe 哈登 易建聯 這類型的球員
他們防守能力薄弱有很大的原因是因為
他們把體力全部投資在進攻上面
球團只要認為他的Z>B
就會讓他繼續用這種模式生存
進攻把握度高的球員
特別容易受到這種青睞
你要一個球員不斷做些爆發性的演出
進攻要衝防守也要衝是不可能的
當然也不是所有球員都有這個限制
有些生化人就完全沒這個疑慮
最著名的就是LBJ了
他最經典的就是 賞快攻球員一個 追魂鍋...
真的超帥 像在飛一樣把球打掉
另外一個 威斯不可也有這種Fu
其實哈等這個缺點雷霆很早就發現了
所以雷霆當初選擇留下 雷帝和生化二弟
算是賭對了..
--
不要亂噓好嗎,拜託了 ▁▂▃▄▅▄▃▂ ▂▄▂▁
╴╴ ▂▃▄▃ ▆▄▃▃▄▅▇ ﹑ ◢ ◣ ▇▇▆▇▇
▕烏東▏ ▇﹑▇ ▁▂▁ ﹑ ◢ ⊙ ﹑
▕鴉興▏ ▇▇▆▇ ﹑ ╱◣ 耀
 ̄ ̄ ﹑ ﹑ ◥ ╲◣ 揚
FB: http://ppt.cc/CVA, ﹑ ∕ ︳ 哥
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.69.123.204
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1397897844.A.FA4.html
推
04/19 16:59, , 1F
04/19 16:59, 1F
→
04/19 17:03, , 2F
04/19 17:03, 2F
→
04/19 17:03, , 3F
04/19 17:03, 3F
推
04/19 17:03, , 4F
04/19 17:03, 4F
推
04/19 17:04, , 5F
04/19 17:04, 5F
推
04/19 17:04, , 6F
04/19 17:04, 6F
→
04/19 17:05, , 7F
04/19 17:05, 7F
→
04/19 17:06, , 8F
04/19 17:06, 8F
推
04/19 17:10, , 9F
04/19 17:10, 9F
推
04/19 17:11, , 10F
04/19 17:11, 10F
推
04/19 17:13, , 11F
04/19 17:13, 11F
→
04/19 17:13, , 12F
04/19 17:13, 12F
推
04/19 17:19, , 13F
04/19 17:19, 13F
→
04/19 17:19, , 14F
04/19 17:19, 14F
推
04/19 17:20, , 15F
04/19 17:20, 15F
噓
04/19 17:22, , 16F
04/19 17:22, 16F
噓
04/19 17:30, , 17F
04/19 17:30, 17F
推
04/19 17:30, , 18F
04/19 17:30, 18F
→
04/19 17:30, , 19F
04/19 17:30, 19F
→
04/19 17:31, , 20F
04/19 17:31, 20F
推
04/19 17:32, , 21F
04/19 17:32, 21F
推
04/19 17:33, , 22F
04/19 17:33, 22F
噓
04/19 17:34, , 23F
04/19 17:34, 23F
推
04/19 17:36, , 24F
04/19 17:36, 24F
噓
04/19 17:38, , 25F
04/19 17:38, 25F
→
04/19 17:38, , 26F
04/19 17:38, 26F
→
04/19 17:38, , 27F
04/19 17:38, 27F
→
04/19 17:39, , 28F
04/19 17:39, 28F
推
04/19 17:40, , 29F
04/19 17:40, 29F
→
04/19 17:40, , 30F
04/19 17:40, 30F
推
04/19 17:41, , 31F
04/19 17:41, 31F
噓
04/19 17:42, , 32F
04/19 17:42, 32F
噓
04/19 17:45, , 33F
04/19 17:45, 33F
噓
04/19 17:46, , 34F
04/19 17:46, 34F
噓
04/19 17:47, , 35F
04/19 17:47, 35F
→
04/19 17:54, , 36F
04/19 17:54, 36F
噓
04/19 17:55, , 37F
04/19 17:55, 37F
→
04/19 17:56, , 38F
04/19 17:56, 38F
噓
04/19 17:56, , 39F
04/19 17:56, 39F
噓
04/19 17:59, , 40F
04/19 17:59, 40F
→
04/19 18:00, , 41F
04/19 18:00, 41F
→
04/19 18:10, , 42F
04/19 18:10, 42F
噓
04/19 18:24, , 43F
04/19 18:24, 43F
推
04/19 18:24, , 44F
04/19 18:24, 44F
噓
04/19 18:29, , 45F
04/19 18:29, 45F
噓
04/19 18:41, , 46F
04/19 18:41, 46F
噓
04/19 18:46, , 47F
04/19 18:46, 47F
→
04/19 18:51, , 48F
04/19 18:51, 48F
→
04/19 18:59, , 49F
04/19 18:59, 49F
噓
04/19 19:03, , 50F
04/19 19:03, 50F
→
04/19 19:04, , 51F
04/19 19:04, 51F
推
04/19 19:05, , 52F
04/19 19:05, 52F
噓
04/19 19:12, , 53F
04/19 19:12, 53F
噓
04/19 19:15, , 54F
04/19 19:15, 54F
→
04/19 19:41, , 55F
04/19 19:41, 55F
→
04/19 19:42, , 56F
04/19 19:42, 56F
→
04/19 19:43, , 57F
04/19 19:43, 57F
噓
04/19 20:08, , 58F
04/19 20:08, 58F
噓
04/19 20:10, , 59F
04/19 20:10, 59F
噓
04/19 20:57, , 60F
04/19 20:57, 60F
噓
04/19 21:27, , 61F
04/19 21:27, 61F
推
04/19 21:58, , 62F
04/19 21:58, 62F
噓
04/19 22:32, , 63F
04/19 22:32, 63F
噓
04/20 00:31, , 64F
04/20 00:31, 64F
噓
04/20 01:04, , 65F
04/20 01:04, 65F
噓
04/20 10:53, , 66F
04/20 10:53, 66F
噓
04/20 19:48, , 67F
04/20 19:48, 67F
噓
04/20 21:13, , 68F
04/20 21:13, 68F
噓
04/22 06:53, , 69F
04/22 06:53, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 7 篇):