[討論] 湖人少了 kobe 戰績為什麼會差這麼多?已回收
以前kobe領軍的laker,是冠軍隊的大熱門,
自從kobe受傷後,湖人的戰績就一落千丈,
所以這球隊算是一人球隊嗎?
看 CP3受傷,缺賽幾場,快艇隊的戰績也不差,
很多當家球星受傷,隊中很快就有二三號球員跳出來,
不斷演出如 林來瘋 之類的戲碼。
kobe已經受傷這麼久了,他領軍這麼多年,
應該也培養不少強將。
怎麼都不見他們跳出來,繼承kobe的鋼鐵意志和曼巴精神呢?
這點我很疑惑,籃球也並不是單靠一個人就夠了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 221.224.148.50
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1397458936.A.CD2.html
推
04/14 15:02, , 1F
04/14 15:02, 1F
沒錯,還有其它人也受傷。
但其它隊也是一樣有傷兵問題, Laker身為名門球隊,
就算不是強將如雲,至少還可以找出二三個大將扛戰績吧。
湖人球員的總薪資不低呢
推
04/14 15:03, , 2F
04/14 15:03, 2F
※ 編輯: Z9 (221.224.148.50), 04/14/2014 15:05:56
→
04/14 15:04, , 3F
04/14 15:04, 3F
→
04/14 15:04, , 4F
04/14 15:04, 4F
不少人也跟著kobe很多年了,
應該也學到很多kobe的技術和技巧,
但現在看到laker,就像我當年看到的山貓隊的感覺一樣
(對山貓球迷說sorry,以前看山貓和巫師,這二隊都很弱
→
04/14 15:05, , 5F
04/14 15:05, 5F
※ 編輯: Z9 (221.224.148.50), 04/14/2014 15:09:48
推
04/14 15:10, , 6F
04/14 15:10, 6F
→
04/14 15:11, , 7F
04/14 15:11, 7F
→
04/14 15:12, , 8F
04/14 15:12, 8F
→
04/14 15:13, , 9F
04/14 15:13, 9F
噓
04/14 15:13, , 10F
04/14 15:13, 10F
→
04/14 15:13, , 11F
04/14 15:13, 11F
→
04/14 15:14, , 12F
04/14 15:14, 12F
推
04/14 15:14, , 13F
04/14 15:14, 13F
噓
04/14 15:15, , 14F
04/14 15:15, 14F
→
04/14 15:19, , 15F
04/14 15:19, 15F
噓
04/14 15:29, , 16F
04/14 15:29, 16F
→
04/14 15:29, , 17F
04/14 15:29, 17F
推
04/14 15:33, , 18F
04/14 15:33, 18F
噓
04/14 15:44, , 19F
04/14 15:44, 19F
噓
04/14 15:48, , 20F
04/14 15:48, 20F
→
04/14 15:48, , 21F
04/14 15:48, 21F
噓
04/14 15:49, , 22F
04/14 15:49, 22F
→
04/14 15:49, , 23F
04/14 15:49, 23F
推
04/14 15:54, , 24F
04/14 15:54, 24F
推
04/14 16:00, , 25F
04/14 16:00, 25F
→
04/14 16:06, , 26F
04/14 16:06, 26F
→
04/14 16:12, , 27F
04/14 16:12, 27F
推
04/14 16:18, , 28F
04/14 16:18, 28F
→
04/14 16:25, , 29F
04/14 16:25, 29F
噓
04/14 16:33, , 30F
04/14 16:33, 30F
推
04/14 16:38, , 31F
04/14 16:38, 31F
噓
04/14 17:00, , 32F
04/14 17:00, 32F
噓
04/14 17:37, , 33F
04/14 17:37, 33F
→
04/14 17:37, , 34F
04/14 17:37, 34F
推
04/14 17:42, , 35F
04/14 17:42, 35F
→
04/14 17:47, , 36F
04/14 17:47, 36F
→
04/14 18:09, , 37F
04/14 18:09, 37F
→
04/14 18:10, , 38F
04/14 18:10, 38F
→
04/14 18:16, , 39F
04/14 18:16, 39F
噓
04/14 18:56, , 40F
04/14 18:56, 40F
噓
04/14 19:12, , 41F
04/14 19:12, 41F
→
04/14 19:13, , 42F
04/14 19:13, 42F
推
04/14 19:21, , 43F
04/14 19:21, 43F
推
04/14 19:23, , 44F
04/14 19:23, 44F
→
04/14 19:23, , 45F
04/14 19:23, 45F
→
04/14 20:37, , 46F
04/14 20:37, 46F
→
04/14 20:37, , 47F
04/14 20:37, 47F
→
04/14 20:38, , 48F
04/14 20:38, 48F
噓
04/14 21:01, , 49F
04/14 21:01, 49F
推
04/14 21:53, , 50F
04/14 21:53, 50F
→
04/14 22:06, , 51F
04/14 22:06, 51F
噓
04/15 00:55, , 52F
04/15 00:55, 52F
推
04/15 03:48, , 53F
04/15 03:48, 53F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):