Re: [討論] 現在的林書豪跟Jennings誰比較強?已回收
※ 引述《Wall11 (Wall11)》之銘言:
: 先附上Jennings今天的成績
: Jennings G 37:16 3-13 2-7 2-3 -10 0 4 4 12 1 2 2 0 0 10 15
: 嗯 很鐵 感覺現在被看破手腳了 沒什麼組織能力又是鐵匠
: 那拿酸民嫌到不行的林書豪跟他比一下呢 現在誰比強呢?
: 印象中 Jennings年薪好像跟林差不多
: Jennings好像有嗆過尼克時期林來瘋的樣子
: 大意好像是名過其實
: 假設 林有Jennings的無限開火權的話
: 數據可不可以刷的比他漂亮?
哈 彌彌好傻好天真喔
火箭隊後場 vs 活塞後場
你知道差別在哪嗎!?
火箭有一個聯盟前三的SG
活塞有一個你可能叫不出他名子的SG
對手防守重點會擺在哈登身上 Lin從來都不是被防守重點
Lin受到的庇護很多
但是 如果Lin跑來活塞 保證很慘
很簡單 活塞後場無大將 Lin來成大將
對手一定全力守死 Lin
Lin本身運球/組織能力不佳 to 和無腦失誤一定增多不少
遲早會被炮到死
酸1 : 又掉球了
酸2 : Lin 得分能力勒!?
酸3 : Lin怎麼只能打上半場阿....
酸4 : 雙塔好像都接不到球耶....
=======================================================================
所以林書豪在火箭隊才是對他好的
專心得分 做好本分就很夠了
到活塞這種重建隊伍
他不是那種可以一肩扛起 所有勝負的人物
建寧說白一點就進攻端很不穩定
其他都有一定的水準 絕對足以當先發PG
活塞戰績爛也不是單純 JOSH / 建寧的問題
整個管理階層都要換掉才有可能讓球隊崛起
這陣容絕對是不錯的 只是沒有是當的教練讓它發乎該有的水準....
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.130.253
→
03/16 20:58, , 1F
03/16 20:58, 1F
推
03/16 20:58, , 2F
03/16 20:58, 2F
噓
03/16 20:59, , 3F
03/16 20:59, 3F
噓
03/16 21:00, , 4F
03/16 21:00, 4F
→
03/16 21:00, , 5F
03/16 21:00, 5F
推
03/16 21:00, , 6F
03/16 21:00, 6F
推
03/16 21:00, , 7F
03/16 21:00, 7F
噓
03/16 21:00, , 8F
03/16 21:00, 8F
噓
03/16 21:01, , 9F
03/16 21:01, 9F
推
03/16 21:01, , 10F
03/16 21:01, 10F
→
03/16 21:02, , 11F
03/16 21:02, 11F
推
03/16 21:02, , 12F
03/16 21:02, 12F
噓
03/16 21:02, , 13F
03/16 21:02, 13F
→
03/16 21:03, , 14F
03/16 21:03, 14F
推
03/16 21:03, , 15F
03/16 21:03, 15F
→
03/16 21:03, , 16F
03/16 21:03, 16F
→
03/16 21:03, , 17F
03/16 21:03, 17F
→
03/16 21:03, , 18F
03/16 21:03, 18F
推
03/16 21:04, , 19F
03/16 21:04, 19F
噓
03/16 21:05, , 20F
03/16 21:05, 20F
噓
03/16 21:05, , 21F
03/16 21:05, 21F
噓
03/16 21:05, , 22F
03/16 21:05, 22F
推
03/16 21:05, , 23F
03/16 21:05, 23F
噓
03/16 21:05, , 24F
03/16 21:05, 24F
推
03/16 21:06, , 25F
03/16 21:06, 25F
噓
03/16 21:06, , 26F
03/16 21:06, 26F
推
03/16 21:06, , 27F
03/16 21:06, 27F
→
03/16 21:07, , 28F
03/16 21:07, 28F
推
03/16 21:08, , 29F
03/16 21:08, 29F
→
03/16 21:08, , 30F
03/16 21:08, 30F
噓
03/16 21:10, , 31F
03/16 21:10, 31F
噓
03/16 21:11, , 32F
03/16 21:11, 32F
推
03/16 21:11, , 33F
03/16 21:11, 33F
→
03/16 21:12, , 34F
03/16 21:12, 34F
推
03/16 21:12, , 35F
03/16 21:12, 35F
噓
03/16 21:12, , 36F
03/16 21:12, 36F
噓
03/16 21:13, , 37F
03/16 21:13, 37F
噓
03/16 21:14, , 38F
03/16 21:14, 38F
噓
03/16 21:14, , 39F
03/16 21:14, 39F
還有 69 則推文
→
03/16 23:23, , 109F
03/16 23:23, 109F
→
03/16 23:28, , 110F
03/16 23:28, 110F
→
03/16 23:30, , 111F
03/16 23:30, 111F
→
03/16 23:31, , 112F
03/16 23:31, 112F
噓
03/16 23:35, , 113F
03/16 23:35, 113F
→
03/16 23:42, , 114F
03/16 23:42, 114F
→
03/16 23:45, , 115F
03/16 23:45, 115F
噓
03/16 23:46, , 116F
03/16 23:46, 116F
→
03/16 23:47, , 117F
03/16 23:47, 117F
→
03/16 23:47, , 118F
03/16 23:47, 118F
噓
03/16 23:48, , 119F
03/16 23:48, 119F
→
03/16 23:49, , 120F
03/16 23:49, 120F
噓
03/16 23:50, , 121F
03/16 23:50, 121F
→
03/16 23:54, , 122F
03/16 23:54, 122F
→
03/16 23:57, , 123F
03/16 23:57, 123F
→
03/17 00:00, , 124F
03/17 00:00, 124F
推
03/17 00:16, , 125F
03/17 00:16, 125F
專業點
給那幾場數據也不能代表甚麼
樣本至少一季吧
※ 編輯: MrLuna 來自: 111.248.130.253 (03/17 00:26)
→
03/17 00:25, , 126F
03/17 00:25, 126F
噓
03/17 00:31, , 127F
03/17 00:31, 127F
→
03/17 00:32, , 128F
03/17 00:32, 128F
噓
03/17 00:33, , 129F
03/17 00:33, 129F
噓
03/17 00:34, , 130F
03/17 00:34, 130F
→
03/17 00:34, , 131F
03/17 00:34, 131F
→
03/17 00:35, , 132F
03/17 00:35, 132F
→
03/17 00:36, , 133F
03/17 00:36, 133F
噓
03/17 00:42, , 134F
03/17 00:42, 134F
→
03/17 00:44, , 135F
03/17 00:44, 135F
→
03/17 00:45, , 136F
03/17 00:45, 136F
噓
03/17 00:47, , 137F
03/17 00:47, 137F
→
03/17 00:48, , 138F
03/17 00:48, 138F
噓
03/17 00:57, , 139F
03/17 00:57, 139F
噓
03/17 02:57, , 140F
03/17 02:57, 140F
→
03/17 02:58, , 141F
03/17 02:58, 141F
→
03/17 02:59, , 142F
03/17 02:59, 142F
推
03/17 03:54, , 143F
03/17 03:54, 143F
推
03/17 03:55, , 144F
03/17 03:55, 144F
推
03/17 09:18, , 145F
03/17 09:18, 145F
噓
03/17 11:18, , 146F
03/17 11:18, 146F
噓
03/17 12:14, , 147F
03/17 12:14, 147F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):