[討論] Beverley的防守很強嗎?已回收
大家都知道PB被取代林先發
最主要是他的防守能力
說拼勁特別好我倒是覺得還好,哪個球員在場上不拼命
但他的防守看起來像是個自殺式防守
亂晃亂晃的像個無頭蒼蠅
這樣像是很厲害嗎?
不知道他有沒有什麼特殊的功力
或是敏銳的預測能力,可以守住一些比別人守不住的球
另外是否激怒對手也是一招?
他一直貼身手亂撥,惹惱對手,然後和對手同歸於盡這樣教練覺得划得來嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.187.97.28
噓
03/10 11:23, , 1F
03/10 11:23, 1F
推
03/10 11:23, , 2F
03/10 11:23, 2F
→
03/10 11:23, , 3F
03/10 11:23, 3F
推
03/10 11:23, , 4F
03/10 11:23, 4F
→
03/10 11:23, , 5F
03/10 11:23, 5F
推
03/10 11:23, , 6F
03/10 11:23, 6F
推
03/10 11:24, , 7F
03/10 11:24, 7F
推
03/10 11:24, , 8F
03/10 11:24, 8F
→
03/10 11:24, , 9F
03/10 11:24, 9F
→
03/10 11:25, , 10F
03/10 11:25, 10F
推
03/10 11:25, , 11F
03/10 11:25, 11F
推
03/10 11:25, , 12F
03/10 11:25, 12F
噓
03/10 11:25, , 13F
03/10 11:25, 13F
→
03/10 11:25, , 14F
03/10 11:25, 14F
→
03/10 11:25, , 15F
03/10 11:25, 15F
→
03/10 11:26, , 16F
03/10 11:26, 16F
噓
03/10 11:26, , 17F
03/10 11:26, 17F
→
03/10 11:26, , 18F
03/10 11:26, 18F
噓
03/10 11:26, , 19F
03/10 11:26, 19F
推
03/10 11:27, , 20F
03/10 11:27, 20F
推
03/10 11:27, , 21F
03/10 11:27, 21F
推
03/10 11:28, , 22F
03/10 11:28, 22F
→
03/10 11:29, , 23F
03/10 11:29, 23F
噓
03/10 11:29, , 24F
03/10 11:29, 24F
→
03/10 11:29, , 25F
03/10 11:29, 25F
噓
03/10 11:29, , 26F
03/10 11:29, 26F
→
03/10 11:29, , 27F
03/10 11:29, 27F
推
03/10 11:30, , 28F
03/10 11:30, 28F
推
03/10 11:30, , 29F
03/10 11:30, 29F
推
03/10 11:31, , 30F
03/10 11:31, 30F
推
03/10 11:31, , 31F
03/10 11:31, 31F
推
03/10 11:31, , 32F
03/10 11:31, 32F
推
03/10 11:31, , 33F
03/10 11:31, 33F
→
03/10 11:32, , 34F
03/10 11:32, 34F
→
03/10 11:32, , 35F
03/10 11:32, 35F
→
03/10 11:34, , 36F
03/10 11:34, 36F
推
03/10 11:37, , 37F
03/10 11:37, 37F
推
03/10 11:38, , 38F
03/10 11:38, 38F
→
03/10 11:38, , 39F
03/10 11:38, 39F
推
03/10 11:39, , 40F
03/10 11:39, 40F
推
03/10 11:40, , 41F
03/10 11:40, 41F
推
03/10 11:40, , 42F
03/10 11:40, 42F
推
03/10 11:40, , 43F
03/10 11:40, 43F
推
03/10 11:41, , 44F
03/10 11:41, 44F
→
03/10 11:41, , 45F
03/10 11:41, 45F
→
03/10 11:41, , 46F
03/10 11:41, 46F
推
03/10 11:42, , 47F
03/10 11:42, 47F
推
03/10 11:42, , 48F
03/10 11:42, 48F
→
03/10 11:42, , 49F
03/10 11:42, 49F
→
03/10 11:43, , 50F
03/10 11:43, 50F
推
03/10 11:43, , 51F
03/10 11:43, 51F
推
03/10 11:43, , 52F
03/10 11:43, 52F
推
03/10 11:43, , 53F
03/10 11:43, 53F
推
03/10 11:44, , 54F
03/10 11:44, 54F
→
03/10 11:45, , 55F
03/10 11:45, 55F
→
03/10 11:45, , 56F
03/10 11:45, 56F
推
03/10 11:46, , 57F
03/10 11:46, 57F
推
03/10 11:50, , 58F
03/10 11:50, 58F
推
03/10 11:52, , 59F
03/10 11:52, 59F
→
03/10 11:52, , 60F
03/10 11:52, 60F
→
03/10 11:52, , 61F
03/10 11:52, 61F
推
03/10 11:52, , 62F
03/10 11:52, 62F
→
03/10 11:53, , 63F
03/10 11:53, 63F
推
03/10 11:53, , 64F
03/10 11:53, 64F
→
03/10 11:53, , 65F
03/10 11:53, 65F
→
03/10 11:53, , 66F
03/10 11:53, 66F
推
03/10 11:54, , 67F
03/10 11:54, 67F
推
03/10 12:12, , 68F
03/10 12:12, 68F
推
03/10 12:20, , 69F
03/10 12:20, 69F
→
03/10 12:21, , 70F
03/10 12:21, 70F
推
03/10 12:22, , 71F
03/10 12:22, 71F
推
03/10 12:23, , 72F
03/10 12:23, 72F
噓
03/10 12:27, , 73F
03/10 12:27, 73F
推
03/10 12:30, , 74F
03/10 12:30, 74F
推
03/10 12:39, , 75F
03/10 12:39, 75F
推
03/10 12:46, , 76F
03/10 12:46, 76F
→
03/10 12:46, , 77F
03/10 12:46, 77F
→
03/10 12:48, , 78F
03/10 12:48, 78F
推
03/10 12:48, , 79F
03/10 12:48, 79F
→
03/10 12:48, , 80F
03/10 12:48, 80F
噓
03/10 12:57, , 81F
03/10 12:57, 81F
推
03/10 13:10, , 82F
03/10 13:10, 82F
推
03/10 13:15, , 83F
03/10 13:15, 83F
推
03/10 13:34, , 84F
03/10 13:34, 84F
推
03/10 14:05, , 85F
03/10 14:05, 85F
→
03/10 14:09, , 86F
03/10 14:09, 86F
噓
03/10 15:17, , 87F
03/10 15:17, 87F
推
03/10 17:39, , 88F
03/10 17:39, 88F
→
03/10 22:42, , 89F
03/10 22:42, 89F
噓
03/10 23:51, , 90F
03/10 23:51, 90F
推
03/11 00:10, , 91F
03/11 00:10, 91F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):