[討論] 歷史上有第七戰跳出來一戰成名的板凳嗎已回收
季後賽第七戰往往令球迷看得膽戰驚心
下場打球的球員其實也備感壓力
因為 win or go home
所以教練往往讓先發球員打的時間很久
那歷史上有在第七戰跳出來狂砍個二、三十分
從此一戰成名的板凳球員嗎?
我的板凳球員定義是原本上場時間很少 不太有名那種
像鬼禿、crawford那種板凳暴徒不在討論範圍之內
我印象中比較接近的只有07年 東區冠軍戰 第六戰
已經聽牌的騎士 突然冒出個小後衛 gibson
一個人狂砍7顆三分 幫助小皇帝生涯首次闖進冠軍賽
但可惜 那場是第六戰
有個例子也蠻接近 就是林來瘋的第一場 對籃網
林砍了25分
那如果那場是發生在季後賽第七戰的話呢?
歷史上有這種例子嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.161.32.248
推
02/11 16:22, , 1F
02/11 16:22, 1F
→
02/11 16:22, , 2F
02/11 16:22, 2F
推
02/11 16:23, , 3F
02/11 16:23, 3F
推
02/11 16:23, , 4F
02/11 16:23, 4F
→
02/11 16:23, , 5F
02/11 16:23, 5F
推
02/11 16:23, , 6F
02/11 16:23, 6F
推
02/11 16:24, , 7F
02/11 16:24, 7F
→
02/11 16:24, , 8F
02/11 16:24, 8F
推
02/11 16:27, , 9F
02/11 16:27, 9F
推
02/11 16:27, , 10F
02/11 16:27, 10F
推
02/11 16:29, , 11F
02/11 16:29, 11F
→
02/11 16:29, , 12F
02/11 16:29, 12F
→
02/11 16:29, , 13F
02/11 16:29, 13F
→
02/11 16:30, , 14F
02/11 16:30, 14F
→
02/11 16:31, , 15F
02/11 16:31, 15F
推
02/11 16:32, , 16F
02/11 16:32, 16F
→
02/11 16:33, , 17F
02/11 16:33, 17F
推
02/11 16:34, , 18F
02/11 16:34, 18F
→
02/11 16:34, , 19F
02/11 16:34, 19F
→
02/11 16:34, , 20F
02/11 16:34, 20F
→
02/11 16:35, , 21F
02/11 16:35, 21F
→
02/11 16:35, , 22F
02/11 16:35, 22F
→
02/11 16:36, , 23F
02/11 16:36, 23F
→
02/11 16:36, , 24F
02/11 16:36, 24F
推
02/11 16:38, , 25F
02/11 16:38, 25F
推
02/11 16:38, , 26F
02/11 16:38, 26F
→
02/11 16:39, , 27F
02/11 16:39, 27F
推
02/11 16:40, , 28F
02/11 16:40, 28F
推
02/11 16:40, , 29F
02/11 16:40, 29F
→
02/11 16:41, , 30F
02/11 16:41, 30F
推
02/11 16:42, , 31F
02/11 16:42, 31F
→
02/11 16:43, , 32F
02/11 16:43, 32F
→
02/11 16:44, , 33F
02/11 16:44, 33F
推
02/11 16:44, , 34F
02/11 16:44, 34F
推
02/11 16:45, , 35F
02/11 16:45, 35F
03 拓荒者對小牛 0比3後Z-BO跳出來打成3比3 但第七戰沒贏
※ 編輯: riddickwu 來自: 118.161.32.248 (02/11 16:48)
推
02/11 16:47, , 36F
02/11 16:47, 36F
推
02/11 16:49, , 37F
02/11 16:49, 37F
推
02/11 16:50, , 38F
02/11 16:50, 38F
推
02/11 16:51, , 39F
02/11 16:51, 39F
→
02/11 16:53, , 40F
02/11 16:53, 40F
推
02/11 17:05, , 41F
02/11 17:05, 41F
推
02/11 17:12, , 42F
02/11 17:12, 42F
推
02/11 17:14, , 43F
02/11 17:14, 43F
→
02/11 17:14, , 44F
02/11 17:14, 44F
→
02/11 17:15, , 45F
02/11 17:15, 45F
推
02/11 17:15, , 46F
02/11 17:15, 46F
推
02/11 17:35, , 47F
02/11 17:35, 47F
推
02/11 17:36, , 48F
02/11 17:36, 48F
→
02/11 17:36, , 49F
02/11 17:36, 49F
→
02/11 17:36, , 50F
02/11 17:36, 50F
推
02/11 18:05, , 51F
02/11 18:05, 51F
→
02/11 18:17, , 52F
02/11 18:17, 52F
推
02/11 18:18, , 53F
02/11 18:18, 53F
推
02/11 18:22, , 54F
02/11 18:22, 54F
→
02/11 18:23, , 55F
02/11 18:23, 55F
→
02/11 18:25, , 56F
02/11 18:25, 56F
推
02/11 18:31, , 57F
02/11 18:31, 57F
→
02/11 18:41, , 58F
02/11 18:41, 58F
→
02/11 18:52, , 59F
02/11 18:52, 59F
推
02/11 18:52, , 60F
02/11 18:52, 60F
推
02/11 18:53, , 61F
02/11 18:53, 61F
推
02/11 18:58, , 62F
02/11 18:58, 62F
→
02/11 18:58, , 63F
02/11 18:58, 63F
→
02/11 18:59, , 64F
02/11 18:59, 64F
推
02/11 19:01, , 65F
02/11 19:01, 65F
→
02/11 19:15, , 66F
02/11 19:15, 66F
→
02/11 19:16, , 67F
02/11 19:16, 67F
推
02/11 22:22, , 68F
02/11 22:22, 68F
→
02/11 22:22, , 69F
02/11 22:22, 69F
→
02/11 22:23, , 70F
02/11 22:23, 70F
推
02/11 22:30, , 71F
02/11 22:30, 71F
推
02/11 23:23, , 72F
02/11 23:23, 72F
→
02/11 23:42, , 73F
02/11 23:42, 73F
推
02/12 02:32, , 74F
02/12 02:32, 74F
推
02/12 09:12, , 75F
02/12 09:12, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):