Re: [新聞] 詹姆斯:防住安東尼就能防住科比KD已回收
※ 引述《assggy (melo)》之銘言:
: http://sports.sina.com.cn/k/2012-08-27/11326204089.shtml
: 問:你更享受哪種贏球、對位模式:鎖定對方的得分王,還是摧毀那些防守體系?
: 詹姆斯:說實話,我更喜歡鎖住對方得分機器,讓對方沒法得分。
: 問:就像季後賽首輪對安東尼?
: 詹姆斯:他就是那樣的得分機器,而且是最厲害的。如果你能防住“甜瓜”,你就能防住
: 杜蘭特,你就能防住科比,你也可以防守任何球員了。
: 雖然是去年的新聞了
: 但還是貼出來看看
: 喇叭詹公認的應該比鍵盤鄉民有說服力
: 雖然近兩年真的有點鐵
: 但好歹生涯也是45%
: KD:沒有任何人能阻擋我的圓
也難怪LBJ會這麼說
2012季後賽 我印象超深刻
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqei545WCes
melo被八爺+LBJ輪流伺候 但依然只能看melo得分
melo跟LBJ都是頂尖的防守悍將 都還是守不住melo
那為啥麼melo最後沒晉級
很簡單...答案就是 熱火有LBJ wade bosh
尼克只有melo
我記得melo開完無雙後一場 就打超爛的 因為沒力了QQ
我個人也是覺得melo其實投球比老大好看 而且melo還有身材優勢
算是老大加強版
可惜 生錯時代
如果Melo 生對時代 配到歐肥 咖嗽 拜嫩...還真的有可能超越喬丹~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.129.24.65
噓
12/10 22:42, , 1F
12/10 22:42, 1F
推
12/10 22:43, , 2F
12/10 22:43, 2F
推
12/10 22:43, , 3F
12/10 22:43, 3F
噓
12/10 22:45, , 4F
12/10 22:45, 4F
→
12/10 22:45, , 5F
12/10 22:45, 5F
→
12/10 22:46, , 6F
12/10 22:46, 6F
噓
12/10 22:48, , 7F
12/10 22:48, 7F
→
12/10 22:48, , 8F
12/10 22:48, 8F
尬受跟拜嫩表示:當我們是隱形人?
※ 編輯: murray5566 來自: 220.129.24.65 (12/10 22:49)
→
12/10 22:49, , 9F
12/10 22:49, 9F
→
12/10 22:50, , 10F
12/10 22:50, 10F
噓
12/10 22:50, , 11F
12/10 22:50, 11F
推
12/10 22:50, , 12F
12/10 22:50, 12F
推
12/10 22:50, , 13F
12/10 22:50, 13F
推
12/10 22:50, , 14F
12/10 22:50, 14F
→
12/10 22:52, , 15F
12/10 22:52, 15F
推
12/10 22:52, , 16F
12/10 22:52, 16F
→
12/10 22:53, , 17F
12/10 22:53, 17F
→
12/10 22:53, , 18F
12/10 22:53, 18F
→
12/10 22:53, , 19F
12/10 22:53, 19F
→
12/10 22:54, , 20F
12/10 22:54, 20F
推
12/10 22:55, , 21F
12/10 22:55, 21F
→
12/10 22:56, , 22F
12/10 22:56, 22F
→
12/10 22:57, , 23F
12/10 22:57, 23F
推
12/10 22:59, , 24F
12/10 22:59, 24F
推
12/10 23:01, , 25F
12/10 23:01, 25F
噓
12/10 23:03, , 26F
12/10 23:03, 26F
科迷最愛講的投關鍵一擊
這項數據 Melo狂電kobe bj4
推
12/10 23:06, , 27F
12/10 23:06, 27F
推
12/10 23:09, , 28F
12/10 23:09, 28F
※ 編輯: murray5566 來自: 220.129.24.65 (12/10 23:12)
推
12/10 23:14, , 29F
12/10 23:14, 29F
推
12/10 23:15, , 30F
12/10 23:15, 30F
噓
12/10 23:23, , 31F
12/10 23:23, 31F
→
12/10 23:24, , 32F
12/10 23:24, 32F
噓
12/10 23:27, , 33F
12/10 23:27, 33F
噓
12/10 23:30, , 34F
12/10 23:30, 34F
→
12/10 23:33, , 35F
12/10 23:33, 35F
→
12/10 23:33, , 36F
12/10 23:33, 36F
噓
12/10 23:35, , 37F
12/10 23:35, 37F
噓
12/10 23:36, , 38F
12/10 23:36, 38F
噓
12/10 23:40, , 39F
12/10 23:40, 39F
噓
12/10 23:44, , 40F
12/10 23:44, 40F
推
12/10 23:50, , 41F
12/10 23:50, 41F
→
12/10 23:50, , 42F
12/10 23:50, 42F
噓
12/11 00:16, , 43F
12/11 00:16, 43F
噓
12/11 00:25, , 44F
12/11 00:25, 44F
噓
12/11 00:35, , 45F
12/11 00:35, 45F
噓
12/11 00:44, , 46F
12/11 00:44, 46F
推
12/11 00:54, , 47F
12/11 00:54, 47F
噓
12/11 01:08, , 48F
12/11 01:08, 48F
噓
12/11 01:48, , 49F
12/11 01:48, 49F
推
12/11 01:50, , 50F
12/11 01:50, 50F
→
12/11 03:41, , 51F
12/11 03:41, 51F
→
12/11 03:42, , 52F
12/11 03:42, 52F
→
12/11 03:43, , 53F
12/11 03:43, 53F
→
12/11 03:43, , 54F
12/11 03:43, 54F
噓
12/11 06:47, , 55F
12/11 06:47, 55F
噓
12/11 11:10, , 56F
12/11 11:10, 56F
噓
12/11 11:13, , 57F
12/11 11:13, 57F
推
12/11 14:11, , 58F
12/11 14:11, 58F
噓
12/12 04:52, , 59F
12/12 04:52, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):