Re: [討論] Nash到底算不算頂級巨星啊?已回收
其實光說數據Nash也當仁不讓
光看最表面的命中率
Season Team FG% 3FG% FT%
2004-05 PHX 50.2% 43.1% 88.7%
2005-06 PHX 51.2% 43.9% 92.1% 180
2006-07 PHX 53.2% 45.5% 89.9% FT差0.1% = 180
2007-08 PHX 50.4% 47.0% 90.6% 180
2008-09 PHX 50.3% 43.9% 93.3% 180
2009-10 PHX 50.7% 42.6% 93.8% 180
2010-11 PHX 49.2% 39.5% 91.2%
2011-12 PHX 53.2% 39.0% 89.4%
2012-13 LAL 49.7% 43.8% 92.2% FG差0.3% = 180
Career 49.1% 42.8% 90.4%
紅字是未達180的部分,說真的面對這種根本180club代名詞的男人
(目前聯盟史上最多次180之人,第二名為大鳥-->2次)
會說他不是巨星的應該只剩少數...某Y之類的
近期最熱絡的算是09-10球季
那時10人輪替殺到西冠直到說好不提的阿泰那一球為止
其實討論熱度都頗高
不過當然Nash不像現在的勁爆選手飛來飛去又製造話題
他是走聰明養身路線,自然討論熱度在球隊黯淡時亦逐漸消弭
況且他最神的還是在助攻,那些妙不可言的傳球方式只有真正看到比賽的人
才會被shock
無法從日後的數據感受出Nash的神乎其技
自然對於當時的Nash不甚了解的人也就不會特別提起
但不可諱言的,Steve Nash 絕對是時代的一個傳奇。
難以否認。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 182.235.191.47
推
10/04 02:06, , 1F
10/04 02:06, 1F
→
10/04 02:06, , 2F
10/04 02:06, 2F
→
10/04 02:07, , 3F
10/04 02:07, 3F
→
10/04 02:08, , 4F
10/04 02:08, 4F
→
10/04 02:08, , 5F
10/04 02:08, 5F
→
10/04 02:09, , 6F
10/04 02:09, 6F
→
10/04 02:09, , 7F
10/04 02:09, 7F
→
10/04 02:09, , 8F
10/04 02:09, 8F
→
10/04 02:09, , 9F
10/04 02:09, 9F
→
10/04 02:10, , 10F
10/04 02:10, 10F
→
10/04 02:14, , 11F
10/04 02:14, 11F
推
10/04 02:22, , 12F
10/04 02:22, 12F
→
10/04 02:23, , 13F
10/04 02:23, 13F
→
10/04 02:24, , 14F
10/04 02:24, 14F
推
10/04 02:26, , 15F
10/04 02:26, 15F
→
10/04 02:26, , 16F
10/04 02:26, 16F
推
10/04 02:26, , 17F
10/04 02:26, 17F
推
10/04 02:30, , 18F
10/04 02:30, 18F
沒錯,有一球Nash從剛發球邊線斜對角直接傳到對場J-Rich接球直接上籃得分
從Nash角度看過去真的超扯
推
10/04 02:39, , 19F
10/04 02:39, 19F
是的.50-40-90俱樂部
推
10/04 03:01, , 20F
10/04 03:01, 20F
推
10/04 03:56, , 21F
10/04 03:56, 21F
噓
10/04 06:44, , 22F
10/04 06:44, 22F
推
10/04 08:10, , 23F
10/04 08:10, 23F
推
10/04 08:53, , 24F
10/04 08:53, 24F
推
10/04 09:37, , 25F
10/04 09:37, 25F
→
10/04 09:37, , 26F
10/04 09:37, 26F
→
10/04 09:37, , 27F
10/04 09:37, 27F
推
10/04 09:58, , 28F
10/04 09:58, 28F
真的很可惜,多打幾年硬拚看看哈哈
推
10/04 10:05, , 29F
10/04 10:05, 29F
推
10/04 11:15, , 30F
10/04 11:15, 30F
推
10/04 11:16, , 31F
10/04 11:16, 31F
推
10/04 11:25, , 32F
10/04 11:25, 32F
推
10/04 11:48, , 33F
10/04 11:48, 33F
嗯嗯,數據是從他領軍太陽後開始列,之前新人&小牛時期
尚未成為主要持球者&整體尚未穩定
推
10/04 11:52, , 34F
10/04 11:52, 34F
推
10/04 12:27, , 35F
10/04 12:27, 35F
→
10/04 12:28, , 36F
10/04 12:28, 36F
→
10/04 12:28, , 37F
10/04 12:28, 37F
華生,你突破盲點了!
推
10/04 12:29, , 38F
10/04 12:29, 38F
推
10/04 12:56, , 39F
10/04 12:56, 39F
推
10/04 13:03, , 40F
10/04 13:03, 40F
哭~"~
推
10/04 13:54, , 41F
10/04 13:54, 41F
我覺得很有機會(雖然都是假設)
畢竟我們跟當年冠軍湖人幾乎伯仲,輸的原因除了阿泰,還有著名的全國客場
相信打進總冠軍,應該有50/50的機會吧
推
10/04 16:14, , 42F
10/04 16:14, 42F
推
10/04 16:15, , 43F
10/04 16:15, 43F
→
10/04 16:15, , 44F
10/04 16:15, 44F
值得欣慰的是還好尚有09-10年直落4一吐怨氣
※ 編輯: pkgameover 來自: 182.235.191.47 (10/04 16:30)
推
10/04 17:29, , 45F
10/04 17:29, 45F
推
10/04 20:29, , 46F
10/04 20:29, 46F
推
10/04 23:24, , 47F
10/04 23:24, 47F
→
10/04 23:24, , 48F
10/04 23:24, 48F
→
10/05 13:39, , 49F
10/05 13:39, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):