Re: [討論] Nash到底算不算頂級巨星啊?已回收
※ 引述《wayne654852 (way)》之銘言:
: 常有人說太陽隊成就了Nash,可是他在小牛時期也是很棒的後衛。
: 雖然數據可能不頂級,但是算是一個優秀的控衛,命中率也很神...
: 到太陽更扯了,連兩年MVP就不講了...
: 雖然O'Neal在的時候拖累整體速度,導致數據下降,可是他很老了...
: 當大歐離開後,他又差點變成助攻王... 印像只輸給Rondo Feat. Boston的紀錄檯。
: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REp0LkNPx2c
: 看這就知道他的數據也是很鬼神啊,為什麼討論他的人就比較不多呢?
: 是因為打法不夠勁爆嗎?
: 雖說因為先天疾病導致防守很破...
不知道算不算頂級
不過卻是史上唯二能達到單季10+助攻、50+%命中率、40+%三分命中率
FG% 3P% FT% AST WS
2004-2005 .502 .431 .887 11.5 10.9
2005-2006 .512 .439 .921 10.5 12.4
2006-2007 .532 .455 .899 11.6 12.6
2007-2008 .504 .470 .906 11.1 10.5
2009-2010 .507 .426 .938 11.0 9.9
另一個是......
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 64.27.17.140
噓
10/04 01:05, , 1F
10/04 01:05, 1F
→
10/04 01:05, , 2F
10/04 01:05, 2F
→
10/04 01:07, , 3F
10/04 01:07, 3F
推
10/04 01:18, , 4F
10/04 01:18, 4F
推
10/04 01:19, , 5F
10/04 01:19, 5F
→
10/04 01:19, , 6F
10/04 01:19, 6F
推
10/04 01:25, , 7F
10/04 01:25, 7F
推
10/04 01:26, , 8F
10/04 01:26, 8F
→
10/04 01:26, , 9F
10/04 01:26, 9F
→
10/04 01:27, , 10F
10/04 01:27, 10F
推
10/04 01:35, , 11F
10/04 01:35, 11F
→
10/04 01:36, , 12F
10/04 01:36, 12F
→
10/04 01:40, , 13F
10/04 01:40, 13F
推
10/04 01:42, , 14F
10/04 01:42, 14F
推
10/04 01:44, , 15F
10/04 01:44, 15F
→
10/04 01:46, , 16F
10/04 01:46, 16F
→
10/04 01:47, , 17F
10/04 01:47, 17F
→
10/04 01:48, , 18F
10/04 01:48, 18F
→
10/04 01:48, , 19F
10/04 01:48, 19F
→
10/04 01:51, , 20F
10/04 01:51, 20F
→
10/04 01:53, , 21F
10/04 01:53, 21F
→
10/04 01:54, , 22F
10/04 01:54, 22F
→
10/04 01:55, , 23F
10/04 01:55, 23F
→
10/04 01:56, , 24F
10/04 01:56, 24F
→
10/04 01:57, , 25F
10/04 01:57, 25F
→
10/04 02:01, , 26F
10/04 02:01, 26F
→
10/04 02:01, , 27F
10/04 02:01, 27F
推
10/04 02:02, , 28F
10/04 02:02, 28F
→
10/04 02:04, , 29F
10/04 02:04, 29F
推
10/04 02:10, , 30F
10/04 02:10, 30F
推
10/04 02:16, , 31F
10/04 02:16, 31F
噓
10/04 03:48, , 32F
10/04 03:48, 32F
→
10/04 15:01, , 33F
10/04 15:01, 33F
→
10/04 15:45, , 34F
10/04 15:45, 34F
→
10/04 15:46, , 35F
10/04 15:46, 35F
→
10/04 15:46, , 36F
10/04 15:46, 36F
推
10/04 20:06, , 37F
10/04 20:06, 37F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):