Re: [討論] 為什麼板上對 ROSE 觀感這麼差已回收
※ 引述《shyshy (shyshy)》之銘言:
: 每次只要出現關鍵字 Rose
: 底下的推文絕對會很歪
: 相對於老美對 Rose 的熱愛
: PTT 根本就是一面倒酸 Rose 酸免錢
: 我在想原因究竟有哪些??
: 1.奪下一個"疑似"史上最弱的MVP獎項 中斷的人還是LBJ
: 2.很會賣鞋
: 3.還沒到那個實力地位 卻因為在芝加哥 老是被捧到天上去
: 比當初 KOBE 和 LBJ 還誇張
: 4.醫生說可以上場 結果穿西裝上場
: ...
: 以下請鄉民補充
當年Rose拿mvp的數據
pts FG% 3PG% TRB AST STL BLK
25.0 .445 .332 4.1 7.7 1.0 0.6
當年LBJ的數據
pts FG% 3PG% TRB AST STL BLK
26.7 .510 .330 7.5 7.0 1.6 0.6
LBJ的數據有沒有打趴Rose這就見仁見智了 因為很多人都是看名字在選MVP
再加上當年公牛戰績的確比熱火好 既然要選Rose那也沒辦法
不過我記得當年季後賽Rose的表現讓我完全感到這傢伙真的有資格拿mvp嗎?
就是在LBJ給Rose再見火鍋後 他竟然在媒體前面說 他是LBJ 我有什麼辦法?
當年外國的鄉民也在爆嗆說這貨講這種MVP不該講的話 把MVP吐出來
他史上最弱MVP的定位大概就是在這裡開始的
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_QR614H1ts
當年被蓋鍋的影片 Rose很像有當場哭出來(?)
至於賣鞋什麼的 最可笑的還是愛迪達拍的那個復出廣告 拍完Rose還是整年不見人影
根本就是欺騙消費者去買他的鞋子 三不五時就說要復出了 今年季後賽公牛被打到快
爆了 也在那喊說準備出來拯救公牛 結果?? 大家都知道 我就不多加闡述
那個笑死人的廣告我找不到 有待大家補充
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.240.150.136
→
09/15 17:24, , 1F
09/15 17:24, 1F
推
09/15 17:26, , 2F
09/15 17:26, 2F
→
09/15 17:27, , 3F
09/15 17:27, 3F
推
09/15 17:27, , 4F
09/15 17:27, 4F
推
09/15 17:27, , 5F
09/15 17:27, 5F
→
09/15 17:28, , 6F
09/15 17:28, 6F
→
09/15 17:33, , 7F
09/15 17:33, 7F
噓
09/15 17:34, , 8F
09/15 17:34, 8F
推
09/15 17:34, , 9F
09/15 17:34, 9F
→
09/15 17:34, , 10F
09/15 17:34, 10F
→
09/15 17:35, , 11F
09/15 17:35, 11F
推
09/15 17:41, , 12F
09/15 17:41, 12F
推
09/15 17:41, , 13F
09/15 17:41, 13F
→
09/15 17:42, , 14F
09/15 17:42, 14F
→
09/15 17:44, , 15F
09/15 17:44, 15F
推
09/15 17:47, , 16F
09/15 17:47, 16F
→
09/15 17:48, , 17F
09/15 17:48, 17F
推
09/15 17:49, , 18F
09/15 17:49, 18F
→
09/15 17:49, , 19F
09/15 17:49, 19F
推
09/15 17:58, , 20F
09/15 17:58, 20F
推
09/15 18:00, , 21F
09/15 18:00, 21F
推
09/15 18:00, , 22F
09/15 18:00, 22F
推
09/15 18:03, , 23F
09/15 18:03, 23F
推
09/15 18:18, , 24F
09/15 18:18, 24F
噓
09/15 18:29, , 25F
09/15 18:29, 25F
→
09/15 18:43, , 26F
09/15 18:43, 26F
→
09/15 18:43, , 27F
09/15 18:43, 27F
推
09/15 18:56, , 28F
09/15 18:56, 28F
→
09/15 18:56, , 29F
09/15 18:56, 29F
推
09/15 18:58, , 30F
09/15 18:58, 30F
→
09/15 18:58, , 31F
09/15 18:58, 31F
→
09/15 18:58, , 32F
09/15 18:58, 32F
→
09/15 18:59, , 33F
09/15 18:59, 33F
推
09/15 19:15, , 34F
09/15 19:15, 34F
→
09/15 19:24, , 35F
09/15 19:24, 35F
→
09/15 19:25, , 36F
09/15 19:25, 36F
噓
09/15 19:28, , 37F
09/15 19:28, 37F
→
09/15 19:28, , 38F
09/15 19:28, 38F
推
09/15 19:30, , 39F
09/15 19:30, 39F
→
09/15 19:31, , 40F
09/15 19:31, 40F
→
09/15 19:32, , 41F
09/15 19:32, 41F
推
09/15 19:40, , 42F
09/15 19:40, 42F
推
09/15 19:58, , 43F
09/15 19:58, 43F
推
09/15 20:07, , 44F
09/15 20:07, 44F
→
09/15 20:07, , 45F
09/15 20:07, 45F
→
09/15 20:20, , 46F
09/15 20:20, 46F
推
09/15 20:50, , 47F
09/15 20:50, 47F
推
09/15 21:07, , 48F
09/15 21:07, 48F
推
09/15 21:15, , 49F
09/15 21:15, 49F
→
09/15 22:20, , 50F
09/15 22:20, 50F
→
09/15 22:20, , 51F
09/15 22:20, 51F
推
09/15 22:27, , 52F
09/15 22:27, 52F
→
09/15 22:27, , 53F
09/15 22:27, 53F
→
09/15 22:27, , 54F
09/15 22:27, 54F
→
09/15 22:28, , 55F
09/15 22:28, 55F
→
09/15 22:29, , 56F
09/15 22:29, 56F
推
09/15 23:15, , 57F
09/15 23:15, 57F
→
09/15 23:15, , 58F
09/15 23:15, 58F
推
09/16 00:13, , 59F
09/16 00:13, 59F
推
09/16 00:20, , 60F
09/16 00:20, 60F
噓
09/16 00:38, , 61F
09/16 00:38, 61F
噓
09/16 06:05, , 62F
09/16 06:05, 62F
噓
09/16 06:42, , 63F
09/16 06:42, 63F
推
09/16 07:22, , 64F
09/16 07:22, 64F
→
09/16 07:23, , 65F
09/16 07:23, 65F
→
09/16 07:24, , 66F
09/16 07:24, 66F
→
09/16 07:26, , 67F
09/16 07:26, 67F
→
09/16 07:27, , 68F
09/16 07:27, 68F
→
09/16 07:28, , 69F
09/16 07:28, 69F
→
09/16 07:29, , 70F
09/16 07:29, 70F
→
09/16 07:29, , 71F
09/16 07:29, 71F
推
09/16 07:44, , 72F
09/16 07:44, 72F
→
09/16 07:45, , 73F
09/16 07:45, 73F
→
09/16 07:45, , 74F
09/16 07:45, 74F
推
09/16 08:24, , 75F
09/16 08:24, 75F
噓
09/16 12:37, , 76F
09/16 12:37, 76F
推
09/16 17:07, , 77F
09/16 17:07, 77F
噓
09/21 13:10, , 78F
09/21 13:10, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):