[討論] Pau Gasol V.S LBJ已回收
NBA版鄉民普遍認為沒有強大內線的Kobe就只是一個平凡的得分後衛
那是不是表示認同Pau Gasol就是這個強大內線呢?(當然還有Shaq)
既然Pau Gasol隨便配上一個平凡的得分後衛就能奪冠
那比較起來,LBJ要奪冠的條件是不是就比較嚴苛了
LBJ需要個不錯的SG(Wade)以及不錯的內線(Bosh)
還需要給他些不錯的外線射手讓他切入後傳球可以得分
這兩位球員哪個比較有主宰力?
在重建球隊的時候會先選哪位做重建基石會比較容易奪冠呢?
比較兩者的生涯數據
Pau Gosal: 2冠 1FMVP(*)
LeBron James: 1冠 1FMVP
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 27.32.51.226
噓
06/04 22:39, , 1F
06/04 22:39, 1F
推
06/04 22:39, , 2F
06/04 22:39, 2F
→
06/04 22:39, , 3F
06/04 22:39, 3F
→
06/04 22:40, , 4F
06/04 22:40, 4F
推
06/04 22:40, , 5F
06/04 22:40, 5F
推
06/04 22:40, , 6F
06/04 22:40, 6F
噓
06/04 22:40, , 7F
06/04 22:40, 7F
→
06/04 22:40, , 8F
06/04 22:40, 8F
推
06/04 22:40, , 9F
06/04 22:40, 9F
推
06/04 22:40, , 10F
06/04 22:40, 10F
→
06/04 22:41, , 11F
06/04 22:41, 11F
推
06/04 22:41, , 12F
06/04 22:41, 12F
→
06/04 22:41, , 13F
06/04 22:41, 13F
噓
06/04 22:42, , 14F
06/04 22:42, 14F
→
06/04 22:42, , 15F
06/04 22:42, 15F
推
06/04 22:42, , 16F
06/04 22:42, 16F
推
06/04 22:42, , 17F
06/04 22:42, 17F
※ 編輯: cacacacat 來自: 27.32.51.226 (06/04 22:44)
→
06/04 22:43, , 18F
06/04 22:43, 18F
→
06/04 22:43, , 19F
06/04 22:43, 19F
→
06/04 22:43, , 20F
06/04 22:43, 20F
噓
06/04 22:44, , 21F
06/04 22:44, 21F
推
06/04 22:44, , 22F
06/04 22:44, 22F
推
06/04 22:45, , 23F
06/04 22:45, 23F
噓
06/04 22:46, , 24F
06/04 22:46, 24F
→
06/04 22:46, , 25F
06/04 22:46, 25F
→
06/04 22:46, , 26F
06/04 22:46, 26F
→
06/04 22:46, , 27F
06/04 22:46, 27F
→
06/04 22:46, , 28F
06/04 22:46, 28F
→
06/04 22:47, , 29F
06/04 22:47, 29F
→
06/04 22:47, , 30F
06/04 22:47, 30F
推
06/04 22:48, , 31F
06/04 22:48, 31F
→
06/04 22:48, , 32F
06/04 22:48, 32F
推
06/04 22:48, , 33F
06/04 22:48, 33F
推
06/04 22:48, , 34F
06/04 22:48, 34F
噓
06/04 22:49, , 35F
06/04 22:49, 35F
→
06/04 22:49, , 36F
06/04 22:49, 36F
推
06/04 22:49, , 37F
06/04 22:49, 37F
→
06/04 22:50, , 38F
06/04 22:50, 38F
推
06/04 22:50, , 39F
06/04 22:50, 39F
噓
06/04 22:54, , 40F
06/04 22:54, 40F
推
06/04 23:06, , 41F
06/04 23:06, 41F
→
06/04 23:06, , 42F
06/04 23:06, 42F
推
06/04 23:16, , 43F
06/04 23:16, 43F
→
06/04 23:16, , 44F
06/04 23:16, 44F
→
06/04 23:17, , 45F
06/04 23:17, 45F
噓
06/04 23:17, , 46F
06/04 23:17, 46F
推
06/04 23:19, , 47F
06/04 23:19, 47F
→
06/04 23:19, , 48F
06/04 23:19, 48F
→
06/04 23:20, , 49F
06/04 23:20, 49F
噓
06/04 23:21, , 50F
06/04 23:21, 50F
→
06/04 23:25, , 51F
06/04 23:25, 51F
→
06/04 23:27, , 52F
06/04 23:27, 52F
→
06/04 23:28, , 53F
06/04 23:28, 53F
→
06/04 23:28, , 54F
06/04 23:28, 54F
噓
06/04 23:28, , 55F
06/04 23:28, 55F
→
06/04 23:31, , 56F
06/04 23:31, 56F
→
06/04 23:35, , 57F
06/04 23:35, 57F
噓
06/04 23:35, , 58F
06/04 23:35, 58F
噓
06/04 23:37, , 59F
06/04 23:37, 59F
→
06/04 23:38, , 60F
06/04 23:38, 60F
推
06/04 23:47, , 61F
06/04 23:47, 61F
噓
06/04 23:51, , 62F
06/04 23:51, 62F
→
06/04 23:52, , 63F
06/04 23:52, 63F
噓
06/04 23:52, , 64F
06/04 23:52, 64F
→
06/04 23:52, , 65F
06/04 23:52, 65F
→
06/04 23:52, , 66F
06/04 23:52, 66F
→
06/04 23:53, , 67F
06/04 23:53, 67F
噓
06/04 23:53, , 68F
06/04 23:53, 68F
推
06/04 23:55, , 69F
06/04 23:55, 69F
→
06/04 23:56, , 70F
06/04 23:56, 70F
→
06/05 00:00, , 71F
06/05 00:00, 71F
推
06/05 00:20, , 72F
06/05 00:20, 72F
→
06/05 00:20, , 73F
06/05 00:20, 73F
→
06/05 00:21, , 74F
06/05 00:21, 74F
推
06/05 00:39, , 75F
06/05 00:39, 75F
→
06/05 00:40, , 76F
06/05 00:40, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):