[專欄] KB's 81 VS MJ's 69 (Coach Nick)已回收
Kobe Bryant’s 81 vs Michael Jordan’s 69
By Coach Nick http://0rz.tw/uxiNe
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I saw these two games being aired on the same day, I immediately got
excited about a dueling breakdown.
Both players shot almost the exact same field goal percentage, but it was
striking to me how differently these two players scored their points.
While the box score below indicates similar games,
there are much more subtle differences in their methods.
當我看到這兩場比賽在同一天被放送的時候，我馬上非常興奮地去作一個比較分析報告。
這兩位球員都用差不多的FG%得到高分，但讓我驚訝的是他們是用截然不同的方式去得分。
我們看看下面的BOX據據，看起來是很相近的。
事實上，他們取分的方式是有很多微妙的不同的。
Los Angeles Lakers
PLAYERS POS MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OR DR TR AST STL BLK TO PF PTS EFF
K.Bryant SG 42 28-46 7-13 18-20 2 4 6 2 3 1 3 1 81 70
Chicago Bulls
PLAYERS POS MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OR DR TR AST STL BLK TO PF PTS EFF
M.Jordan SG 50 23-37 2-6 21-23 7 11 18 6 4 1 2 5 69 80
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some things to clear up about how different the circumstances were between
these two teams.
有關於這兩支球隊當時不同的狀況與環境條件，並須先做個澄清。
Michael Jordan was playing on a young Bulls team a year away from capturing
their first title.
Scottie Pippen and Horace Grant were just starting to figure out the secret
to competing at an elite level, joining Michael Jordan who was in the midst
of his 4th straight scoring title.
Michael Jordan當時在年輕的公牛隊打球，並在隔年才取得他們的第一個總冠軍。
而Scottie Pippen & Horace Grant則剛加入正尋求衛冕個人連續第四次得分王的MJ行列，
並剛開始發現在菁英等級中去競技的奧秘。
(*註1:89-90，當年的MJ是26歲，是他加入公牛隊的第六年。)
(*註2:89-90，當年的SP是23歲，是他加入公牛隊的第三年。)
(*註3:89-90，當年的HG是24歲，是他加入公牛隊的第三年。)
(*註4:89-90，當年的教練是Phil Jackson，第一年執教公牛隊。)
Kobe Bryant, on the flip side, was a year and a half out of competing for a
title with Shaquille O’Neal and Karl Malone.
Smush Parker and Kwame Brown were running around out there with him,
forcing Kobe to shoulder a much larger load.
相反地，當時的Kobe Bryant才在一年半前(03-04球季)
與Shaquille O’Neal & Karl Malone在總冠軍賽失利。
而Smush Parker & Kwame Brown在他身旁，逼著KB需要扛下更多責任與重擔。
(*註1:05-06，當年的KB是27歲，是他加入湖人隊的第十年。)
(*註2:05-06，當年的SP是24歲，是他加入湖人隊的第一年。)
(*註3:05-06，當年的KB是23歲，是他加入湖人隊的第一年。)
(*註4:05-06，當年的教練是Phil Jackson，第六年執教湖人隊。)
(*註5:04-05，湖人隊教練分別是R. Tomjanovich，F. Hamblen。)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aside from the circumstantial evidence, the biggest thing I took away from
this juxtaposition is how different these two moved in space.
Michael Jordan seems so much more smooth and powerful in comparison to
Kobe’s athletic ability.
先把上述的間接證據放一旁，我將兩人並列比較後，
所得到的最大差異點，是他們在空間中移動的不同。
Michael Jordan與Kobe Bryant的運動能力相比，
Michael Jordan看似移動地更順暢與更有力量。
Don’t get me wrong, Kobe is an athletic freak of nature, but Michael
transcended that like no other player in the league before or since.
Michael also seemed steadier with his scoring, without the need to force
as many shots, while Kobe had a couple of clunky stretches that wouldn’t
seem to indicate he was in the middle of one of the greatest scoring
binges of all time.
不要誤會我的意思，Kobe的運動能力已經是異常的好。
但是Michael的能力更是前無古人後無來者。
Michael在得分能力上看似更穩定，不需要大量的出手。
而Kobe有一些沉重的高難度出手，讓他看起來不像往歷史上最偉大的得分手之一的路走。
Whether this comparison is unfair or not,
Kobe has done little to discourage it.
His career will go down as one of the top 10 of all time,
with induction to the Hall of Fame a certainty.
Of course, his career still falls short of Jordan’s, both in
individual achievement and team accomplishments.
不論這樣的比較是否公平。
他的職業生涯將被記載成為NBA歷史上前10大的人物，並毫無疑問地進入名人堂。
當然他的職業生涯以目前而言，不管個人成績的成就或團隊成績的成就都還落後MJ一些。
(註1: MJ - 得分王共計10次，總冠軍共計6次。)
(註2: KB - 得分王共計 2次，總冠軍共計5次。)
From a head to head perspective, Kobe does not exist in the same plane as
Michael Jordan.
There is no shame in that, since no other player combined raw physical tools
with extreme mental domination like MJ did.
While this is certainly an entertaining and worthwhile debate,
I might go so far as saying Kobe Bryant isn’t even the best Laker of all time.
如果拿兩人直接作比較，Kobe並沒有與Michael Jordan在同一個水平。
但這沒有甚麼可恥的，因為也沒有其他球員，能如同MJ一般，
同時具有優異的體能天賦與極端的精神統御力。
儘管這只是茶餘飯後的娛樂話題，但也同時是值得辯論的，
我可能會說到目前為止，Kobe Bryant甚至還不算是湖人隊歷史上最偉大的球員。
The competition was also much different in these two games.
While the 1989-90 Cleveland Cavaliers finished just above .500 (42-40),
they were still a formidable foe with a tough nucleus of Mark Price,
Craig Ehlo, Larry Nance, and Brad Daugherty intact.
Coached by Lennie Wilkens, they were smart, tough, and played with a sense
of purpose.
而這兩場比賽的競爭對手，也是截然不同的。
即使89-90球季的克里夫蘭騎士隊只以略高於五成的勝率結束球季(42-40)，
但那時他們仍保有如Mark Price，Craig Ehlo， Larry Nance和Brad Daugherty，
這些難纏的人物，也仍算是一支令人敬畏的球隊。
當時由Lennie Wilkens教練帶領的這支球隊，他們聰明，強悍並且頭腦清楚。
(*註: March 28,1990 - Bulls 117 : Cavaliers 113)
Contrast that to the 2005-06 Toronto Raptors, and you’ll see why it wasn’t
so surprising Kobe went off on them.
Led by Sam Mitchell, who has a career winning percentage of .452,
this team featured a young Chris Bosh and not much else.
Moe Peterson was forced to guard Kobe, and ended up intentionally fouling him
by the end to get out of this assignment.
Jalen Rose was at the end of his string and was no match either.
Top that off with a distinct lack of defensive philosophy,
and it was a perfect storm.
對比05-06球季的多倫多暴龍隊後，你將對於Kobe的爆發不會感到太大的驚訝。
由生涯執教勝率只有.452的Sam Mitchell所帶領，主將僅僅只能算有Chris Bosh一名。
Moe Peterson被迫守到Kobe，但結果是作出故意犯規後，下台一鞠躬。
Jalen Rose的表現也與他的實力不符。
整支球隊在防守端明顯地散漫，造就了這股完美的風暴。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
內文影片，BBallbreakdown: Kobe Bryant's 81 vs Michael Jordan's 69
http://0rz.tw/sSZA7
影片中有分析兩人該場的比較，有待聽譯強者翻譯了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.246.24.48
噓
05/20 23:43, , 1F
05/20 23:43, 1F
→
05/20 23:44, , 2F
05/20 23:44, 2F
→
05/20 23:44, , 3F
05/20 23:44, 3F
推
05/20 23:44, , 4F
05/20 23:44, 4F
抱歉，謝謝提醒，已更正。
→
05/20 23:45, , 5F
05/20 23:45, 5F
→
05/20 23:45, , 6F
05/20 23:45, 6F
→
05/20 23:45, , 7F
05/20 23:45, 7F
→
05/20 23:46, , 8F
05/20 23:46, 8F
推
05/20 23:46, , 9F
05/20 23:46, 9F
推
05/20 23:47, , 10F
05/20 23:47, 10F
推
05/20 23:47, , 11F
05/20 23:47, 11F
→
05/20 23:47, , 12F
05/20 23:47, 12F
推
05/20 23:47, , 13F
05/20 23:47, 13F
→
05/20 23:48, , 14F
05/20 23:48, 14F
→
05/20 23:48, , 15F
05/20 23:48, 15F
→
05/20 23:49, , 16F
05/20 23:49, 16F
推
05/20 23:49, , 17F
05/20 23:49, 17F
推
05/20 23:49, , 18F
05/20 23:49, 18F
推
05/20 23:50, , 19F
05/20 23:50, 19F
推
05/20 23:50, , 20F
05/20 23:50, 20F
推
05/20 23:50, , 21F
05/20 23:50, 21F
噓
05/20 23:50, , 22F
05/20 23:50, 22F
→
05/20 23:51, , 23F
05/20 23:51, 23F
→
05/20 23:51, , 24F
05/20 23:51, 24F
推
05/20 23:51, , 25F
05/20 23:51, 25F
推
05/20 23:52, , 26F
05/20 23:52, 26F
※ 編輯: KenRock 來自: 111.246.24.48 (05/20 23:53)
→
05/20 23:53, , 27F
05/20 23:53, 27F
噓
05/20 23:53, , 28F
05/20 23:53, 28F
→
05/20 23:55, , 29F
05/20 23:55, 29F
→
05/20 23:55, , 30F
05/20 23:55, 30F
推
05/20 23:56, , 31F
05/20 23:56, 31F
→
05/20 23:56, , 32F
05/20 23:56, 32F
→
05/20 23:56, , 33F
05/20 23:56, 33F
推
05/20 23:56, , 34F
05/20 23:56, 34F
→
05/20 23:56, , 35F
05/20 23:56, 35F
→
05/20 23:57, , 36F
05/20 23:57, 36F
→
05/20 23:57, , 37F
05/20 23:57, 37F
推
05/20 23:57, , 38F
05/20 23:57, 38F
→
05/20 23:58, , 39F
05/20 23:58, 39F
→
05/20 23:58, , 40F
05/20 23:58, 40F
→
05/20 23:59, , 41F
05/20 23:59, 41F
推
05/20 23:59, , 42F
05/20 23:59, 42F
噓
05/21 00:00, , 43F
05/21 00:00, 43F
推
05/21 00:02, , 44F
05/21 00:02, 44F
→
05/21 00:07, , 45F
05/21 00:07, 45F
→
05/21 00:08, , 46F
05/21 00:08, 46F
→
05/21 00:08, , 47F
05/21 00:08, 47F
推
05/21 00:08, , 48F
05/21 00:08, 48F
→
05/21 00:08, , 49F
05/21 00:08, 49F
推
05/21 00:10, , 50F
05/21 00:10, 50F
→
05/21 00:11, , 51F
05/21 00:11, 51F
推
05/21 00:16, , 52F
05/21 00:16, 52F
→
05/21 00:17, , 53F
05/21 00:17, 53F
推
05/21 00:21, , 54F
05/21 00:21, 54F
推
05/21 00:23, , 55F
05/21 00:23, 55F
推
05/21 00:25, , 56F
05/21 00:25, 56F
→
05/21 00:26, , 57F
05/21 00:26, 57F
推
05/21 00:32, , 58F
05/21 00:32, 58F
推
05/21 00:36, , 59F
05/21 00:36, 59F
→
05/21 00:36, , 60F
05/21 00:36, 60F
推
05/21 00:38, , 61F
05/21 00:38, 61F
推
05/21 00:39, , 62F
05/21 00:39, 62F
→
05/21 00:41, , 63F
05/21 00:41, 63F
噓
05/21 00:41, , 64F
05/21 00:41, 64F
推
05/21 00:42, , 65F
05/21 00:42, 65F
推
05/21 00:53, , 66F
05/21 00:53, 66F
噓
05/21 01:00, , 67F
05/21 01:00, 67F
推
05/21 01:04, , 68F
05/21 01:04, 68F
→
05/21 01:05, , 69F
05/21 01:05, 69F
→
05/21 01:06, , 70F
05/21 01:06, 70F
→
05/21 01:06, , 71F
05/21 01:06, 71F
→
05/21 01:07, , 72F
05/21 01:07, 72F
推
05/21 01:07, , 73F
05/21 01:07, 73F
→
05/21 01:08, , 74F
05/21 01:08, 74F
→
05/21 01:09, , 75F
05/21 01:09, 75F
→
05/21 01:09, , 76F
05/21 01:09, 76F
→
05/21 01:09, , 77F
05/21 01:09, 77F
推
05/21 01:15, , 78F
05/21 01:15, 78F
推
05/21 01:19, , 79F
05/21 01:19, 79F
推
05/21 01:22, , 80F
05/21 01:22, 80F
→
05/21 01:23, , 81F
05/21 01:23, 81F
推
05/21 01:27, , 82F
05/21 01:27, 82F
推
05/21 01:32, , 83F
05/21 01:32, 83F
推
05/21 01:41, , 84F
05/21 01:41, 84F
推
05/21 01:43, , 85F
05/21 01:43, 85F
推
05/21 01:49, , 86F
05/21 01:49, 86F
→
05/21 02:18, , 87F
05/21 02:18, 87F
推
05/21 02:34, , 88F
05/21 02:34, 88F
推
05/21 12:22, , 89F
05/21 12:22, 89F
推
05/21 13:15, , 90F
05/21 13:15, 90F
討論串 (同標題文章)