[討論]聯盟是不是該給濕婆一個COY?已回收
Erik Spoelstra(濕婆)
這次只拿下COY(年度最佳教練)票選排名第2
2008-2009年濕婆剛接熱火教頭
那季熱火只打出 43勝39敗 5成24的勝率
2009-2010年熱火也是只有47勝35敗 5成73的勝率
到了2010-2011年球季 熱火變成58勝24敗 勝率提高到了7成07
季後賽更帶領熱火打敗聯盟第一的公牛 打進總冠軍戰
最後以2:4惜敗
(這個球季比前一球季勝場跟勝率進步不少 應該足以拿COY?)
接著隔年
2011-2012縮水球季
熱火打出6成97勝率 最後拿下聯盟總冠軍 LBJ拿到季賽MVP
2012-2013球季
熱火打出66勝16敗 勝率8成05的的好成績(應該是熱火隊史最佳?)
LBJ連莊季賽MVP
第一輪4:0橫掃公鹿(對比第一輪被低種子淘汰的 擁有COY金塊隊...)
第二輪 第二場狂贏防守雄師公牛
這球季熱火打出那麼好的成績
史上單季比66勝多的記錄也沒幾個
為何濕婆拿不到COY?
反而是頒給第一輪被逆轉淘汰的George Karl?
MVP跟COY同隊也不是沒發生過
以前的Jordan 拿MVP 禪師拿COY
後來騎士的LBJ拿MVP 騎士教練拿COY
再來公牛的Rose拿MVP Thibodeau拿COY
難道熱火的好戰績都只因有LBJ?濕婆難道沒功勞嗎?
聯盟是不是該給濕婆一個COY?
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.236.210
噓
05/09 10:32, , 1F
05/09 10:32, 1F
→
05/09 10:32, , 2F
05/09 10:32, 2F
推
05/09 10:32, , 3F
05/09 10:32, 3F
推
05/09 10:32, , 4F
05/09 10:32, 4F
→
05/09 10:32, , 5F
05/09 10:32, 5F
推
05/09 10:32, , 6F
05/09 10:32, 6F
→
05/09 10:32, , 7F
05/09 10:32, 7F
推
05/09 10:32, , 8F
05/09 10:32, 8F
推
05/09 10:33, , 9F
05/09 10:33, 9F
推
05/09 10:33, , 10F
05/09 10:33, 10F
→
05/09 10:33, , 11F
05/09 10:33, 11F
推
05/09 10:33, , 12F
05/09 10:33, 12F
→
05/09 10:33, , 13F
05/09 10:33, 13F
推
05/09 10:33, , 14F
05/09 10:33, 14F
→
05/09 10:34, , 15F
05/09 10:34, 15F
推
05/09 10:34, , 16F
05/09 10:34, 16F
→
05/09 10:34, , 17F
05/09 10:34, 17F
推
05/09 10:34, , 18F
05/09 10:34, 18F
推
05/09 10:35, , 19F
05/09 10:35, 19F
→
05/09 10:35, , 20F
05/09 10:35, 20F
推
05/09 10:35, , 21F
05/09 10:35, 21F
→
05/09 10:35, , 22F
05/09 10:35, 22F
→
05/09 10:35, , 23F
05/09 10:35, 23F
推
05/09 10:36, , 24F
05/09 10:36, 24F
推
05/09 10:37, , 25F
05/09 10:37, 25F
→
05/09 10:37, , 26F
05/09 10:37, 26F
→
05/09 10:38, , 27F
05/09 10:38, 27F
推
05/09 10:38, , 28F
05/09 10:38, 28F
推
05/09 10:38, , 29F
05/09 10:38, 29F
推
05/09 10:38, , 30F
05/09 10:38, 30F
推
05/09 10:38, , 31F
05/09 10:38, 31F
→
05/09 10:38, , 32F
05/09 10:38, 32F
推
05/09 10:38, , 33F
05/09 10:38, 33F
→
05/09 10:38, , 34F
05/09 10:38, 34F
推
05/09 10:38, , 35F
05/09 10:38, 35F
→
05/09 10:38, , 36F
05/09 10:38, 36F
→
05/09 10:38, , 37F
05/09 10:38, 37F
推
05/09 10:38, , 38F
05/09 10:38, 38F
→
05/09 10:39, , 39F
05/09 10:39, 39F
還有 74 則推文
推
05/09 11:11, , 114F
05/09 11:11, 114F
推
05/09 11:15, , 115F
05/09 11:15, 115F
→
05/09 11:21, , 116F
05/09 11:21, 116F
推
05/09 11:21, , 117F
05/09 11:21, 117F
→
05/09 11:22, , 118F
05/09 11:22, 118F
推
05/09 11:23, , 119F
05/09 11:23, 119F
推
05/09 11:23, , 120F
05/09 11:23, 120F
→
05/09 11:23, , 121F
05/09 11:23, 121F
推
05/09 11:32, , 122F
05/09 11:32, 122F
推
05/09 11:34, , 123F
05/09 11:34, 123F
推
05/09 11:34, , 124F
05/09 11:34, 124F
推
05/09 11:37, , 125F
05/09 11:37, 125F
推
05/09 11:42, , 126F
05/09 11:42, 126F
推
05/09 11:43, , 127F
05/09 11:43, 127F
推
05/09 11:50, , 128F
05/09 11:50, 128F
推
05/09 11:59, , 129F
05/09 11:59, 129F
推
05/09 12:01, , 130F
05/09 12:01, 130F
推
05/09 12:03, , 131F
05/09 12:03, 131F
推
05/09 12:19, , 132F
05/09 12:19, 132F
推
05/09 12:20, , 133F
05/09 12:20, 133F
推
05/09 12:24, , 134F
05/09 12:24, 134F
推
05/09 12:28, , 135F
05/09 12:28, 135F
推
05/09 12:32, , 136F
05/09 12:32, 136F
→
05/09 12:49, , 137F
05/09 12:49, 137F
推
05/09 13:01, , 138F
05/09 13:01, 138F
噓
05/09 13:03, , 139F
05/09 13:03, 139F
→
05/09 13:12, , 140F
05/09 13:12, 140F
→
05/09 13:16, , 141F
05/09 13:16, 141F
→
05/09 13:16, , 142F
05/09 13:16, 142F
推
05/09 13:44, , 143F
05/09 13:44, 143F
→
05/09 14:30, , 144F
05/09 14:30, 144F
噓
05/09 14:40, , 145F
05/09 14:40, 145F
推
05/09 15:13, , 146F
05/09 15:13, 146F
→
05/09 15:14, , 147F
05/09 15:14, 147F
→
05/09 15:15, , 148F
05/09 15:15, 148F
→
05/09 15:15, , 149F
05/09 15:15, 149F
推
05/09 18:19, , 150F
05/09 18:19, 150F
→
05/09 18:26, , 151F
05/09 18:26, 151F
噓
05/10 01:02, , 152F
05/10 01:02, 152F
噓
05/10 18:13, , 153F
05/10 18:13, 153F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
討論
70
153