[討論]湖人要解決困境,是否最好引進Lin?已回收
冷笑話,是個擅長讓控球後衛發揮到極致實力的教練
例如:
在太陽當教練時的Nash,在尼克時的Felton,Duhon,Lin
都在冷笑話體系下發光發熱
跟愛自幹的鬍子哥同隊加上常被教練冰的Lin,
他還能表現不錯的數據
代表他真的是有實力
而且Lin的切入能力頗強,打球又很聰明
,而且又不爭球權,不爭當隊上老大
加上Lin在冷笑話體系下,打出林來瘋
代表Lin應該很適應冷笑話體系
加上Lin這次明星賽投票在西區排後衛第三名
代表他有一定的高人氣
有人氣+實力+不爭球權,不爭當隊上老大+能帶給隊上融洽+切入能力頗強+打球又很聰明
記得
Lin曾說過他原本最想加入的球隊是湖人
湖人不選他,讓他生氣一段時間
Nash已老
大家覺得湖人在不換教練的前提下,如果要解決目前困境
是否最好想辦法引進LIN呢?
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.115.224
※ 編輯: ptt888 來自: 140.112.115.224 (04/27 22:20)
→
04/27 22:19, , 1F
04/27 22:19, 1F
噓
04/27 22:19, , 2F
04/27 22:19, 2F
推
04/27 22:20, , 3F
04/27 22:20, 3F
→
04/27 22:20, , 4F
04/27 22:20, 4F
噓
04/27 22:20, , 5F
04/27 22:20, 5F
→
04/27 22:21, , 6F
04/27 22:21, 6F
→
04/27 22:22, , 7F
04/27 22:22, 7F
噓
04/27 22:23, , 8F
04/27 22:23, 8F
→
04/27 22:24, , 9F
04/27 22:24, 9F
→
04/27 22:24, , 10F
04/27 22:24, 10F
→
04/27 22:25, , 11F
04/27 22:25, 11F
推
04/27 22:26, , 12F
04/27 22:26, 12F
推
04/27 22:27, , 13F
04/27 22:27, 13F
→
04/27 22:27, , 14F
04/27 22:27, 14F
→
04/27 22:28, , 15F
04/27 22:28, 15F
→
04/27 22:28, , 16F
04/27 22:28, 16F
→
04/27 22:28, , 17F
04/27 22:28, 17F
推
04/27 22:28, , 18F
04/27 22:28, 18F
→
04/27 22:28, , 19F
04/27 22:28, 19F
噓
04/27 22:29, , 20F
04/27 22:29, 20F
→
04/27 22:29, , 21F
04/27 22:29, 21F
噓
04/27 22:31, , 22F
04/27 22:31, 22F
推
04/27 22:32, , 23F
04/27 22:32, 23F
噓
04/27 22:33, , 24F
04/27 22:33, 24F
推
04/27 22:33, , 25F
04/27 22:33, 25F
→
04/27 22:34, , 26F
04/27 22:34, 26F
推
04/27 22:35, , 27F
04/27 22:35, 27F
→
04/27 22:36, , 28F
04/27 22:36, 28F
噓
04/27 22:36, , 29F
04/27 22:36, 29F
推
04/27 22:39, , 30F
04/27 22:39, 30F
推
04/27 22:41, , 31F
04/27 22:41, 31F
推
04/27 22:43, , 32F
04/27 22:43, 32F
推
04/27 22:45, , 33F
04/27 22:45, 33F
推
04/27 22:48, , 34F
04/27 22:48, 34F
推
04/27 22:50, , 35F
04/27 22:50, 35F
推
04/27 22:52, , 36F
04/27 22:52, 36F
推
04/27 22:53, , 37F
04/27 22:53, 37F
推
04/27 22:57, , 38F
04/27 22:57, 38F
噓
04/27 22:59, , 39F
04/27 22:59, 39F
噓
04/27 23:03, , 40F
04/27 23:03, 40F
推
04/27 23:08, , 41F
04/27 23:08, 41F
噓
04/27 23:30, , 42F
04/27 23:30, 42F
→
04/27 23:33, , 43F
04/27 23:33, 43F
推
04/27 23:34, , 44F
04/27 23:34, 44F
推
04/27 23:34, , 45F
04/27 23:34, 45F
推
04/27 23:35, , 46F
04/27 23:35, 46F
推
04/28 00:00, , 47F
04/28 00:00, 47F
推
04/28 00:08, , 48F
04/28 00:08, 48F
推
04/28 00:26, , 49F
04/28 00:26, 49F
噓
04/28 00:27, , 50F
04/28 00:27, 50F
→
04/28 00:35, , 51F
04/28 00:35, 51F
推
04/28 00:40, , 52F
04/28 00:40, 52F
推
04/28 00:46, , 53F
04/28 00:46, 53F
推
04/28 00:53, , 54F
04/28 00:53, 54F
推
04/28 01:21, , 55F
04/28 01:21, 55F
推
04/28 02:05, , 56F
04/28 02:05, 56F
推
04/28 07:54, , 57F
04/28 07:54, 57F
推
04/28 08:09, , 58F
04/28 08:09, 58F
噓
04/28 08:46, , 59F
04/28 08:46, 59F
推
04/28 09:04, , 60F
04/28 09:04, 60F
→
04/28 09:04, , 61F
04/28 09:04, 61F
→
04/28 12:28, , 62F
04/28 12:28, 62F
噓
04/28 12:39, , 63F
04/28 12:39, 63F
→
04/28 12:47, , 64F
04/28 12:47, 64F
噓
04/28 15:42, , 65F
04/28 15:42, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):