Re: [新聞] 杜蘭特:我要試試得分王 下場要得70分?已回收
姑且不論KD是說真的還是開玩笑的,基本上在最後一場這樣搞,
一定會被非KD迷唾棄,除非命中率超高大概7.8成,這樣可能口水會少一點。
我是好奇上一個這樣搞的海軍上將,當時輿論是如何?因為看這幾年的新聞
在描述那件事,幾乎都是很正面的在形容,例如:"上將狂拿71分奪下得分王"
是因為當時上將地位比俠客高很多嗎,所以這樣搞沒人敢說什麼?我查了一下
當年上將是第5個球季俠客是第2個球季,俠客才第二年是還有點菜。
媒體當時都沒有狂噴這種刷得分王的舉動嗎,還是大家都喜歡看刷高分?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.125.206.90
推
04/17 11:32, , 1F
04/17 11:32, 1F
噓
04/17 11:32, , 2F
04/17 11:32, 2F
→
04/17 11:33, , 3F
04/17 11:33, 3F
推
04/17 11:34, , 4F
04/17 11:34, 4F
→
04/17 11:34, , 5F
04/17 11:34, 5F
推
04/17 11:34, , 6F
04/17 11:34, 6F
推
04/17 11:34, , 7F
04/17 11:34, 7F
噓
04/17 11:34, , 8F
04/17 11:34, 8F
→
04/17 11:35, , 9F
04/17 11:35, 9F
推
04/17 11:35, , 10F
04/17 11:35, 10F
推
04/17 11:37, , 11F
04/17 11:37, 11F
噓
04/17 11:37, , 12F
04/17 11:37, 12F
→
04/17 11:37, , 13F
04/17 11:37, 13F
噓
04/17 11:37, , 14F
04/17 11:37, 14F
→
04/17 11:38, , 15F
04/17 11:38, 15F
→
04/17 11:38, , 16F
04/17 11:38, 16F
噓
04/17 11:38, , 17F
04/17 11:38, 17F
推
04/17 11:40, , 18F
04/17 11:40, 18F
推
04/17 11:42, , 19F
04/17 11:42, 19F
推
04/17 11:43, , 20F
04/17 11:43, 20F
推
04/17 11:43, , 21F
04/17 11:43, 21F
推
04/17 11:43, , 22F
04/17 11:43, 22F
→
04/17 11:43, , 23F
04/17 11:43, 23F
推
04/17 11:44, , 24F
04/17 11:44, 24F
→
04/17 11:44, , 25F
04/17 11:44, 25F
推
04/17 11:45, , 26F
04/17 11:45, 26F
推
04/17 11:47, , 27F
04/17 11:47, 27F
推
04/17 11:47, , 28F
04/17 11:47, 28F
推
04/17 11:48, , 29F
04/17 11:48, 29F
→
04/17 11:48, , 30F
04/17 11:48, 30F
→
04/17 11:49, , 31F
04/17 11:49, 31F
→
04/17 11:49, , 32F
04/17 11:49, 32F
推
04/17 11:49, , 33F
04/17 11:49, 33F
推
04/17 11:50, , 34F
04/17 11:50, 34F
→
04/17 11:51, , 35F
04/17 11:51, 35F
推
04/17 11:51, , 36F
04/17 11:51, 36F
→
04/17 11:51, , 37F
04/17 11:51, 37F
推
04/17 11:51, , 38F
04/17 11:51, 38F
→
04/17 11:52, , 39F
04/17 11:52, 39F
→
04/17 11:52, , 40F
04/17 11:52, 40F
推
04/17 11:52, , 41F
04/17 11:52, 41F
噓
04/17 11:53, , 42F
04/17 11:53, 42F
→
04/17 11:53, , 43F
04/17 11:53, 43F
噓
04/17 11:55, , 44F
04/17 11:55, 44F
→
04/17 11:55, , 45F
04/17 11:55, 45F
推
04/17 11:58, , 46F
04/17 11:58, 46F
→
04/17 11:59, , 47F
04/17 11:59, 47F
→
04/17 12:03, , 48F
04/17 12:03, 48F
推
04/17 12:11, , 49F
04/17 12:11, 49F
推
04/17 12:12, , 50F
04/17 12:12, 50F
→
04/17 12:19, , 51F
04/17 12:19, 51F
推
04/17 12:20, , 52F
04/17 12:20, 52F
→
04/17 12:23, , 53F
04/17 12:23, 53F
噓
04/17 12:23, , 54F
04/17 12:23, 54F
→
04/17 12:23, , 55F
04/17 12:23, 55F
噓
04/17 12:49, , 56F
04/17 12:49, 56F
推
04/17 12:55, , 57F
04/17 12:55, 57F
推
04/17 13:00, , 58F
04/17 13:00, 58F
噓
04/17 13:04, , 59F
04/17 13:04, 59F
推
04/17 13:17, , 60F
04/17 13:17, 60F
推
04/17 13:32, , 61F
04/17 13:32, 61F
→
04/17 14:09, , 62F
04/17 14:09, 62F
推
04/17 16:32, , 63F
04/17 16:32, 63F
→
04/17 16:32, , 64F
04/17 16:32, 64F
→
04/17 19:58, , 65F
04/17 19:58, 65F
→
04/17 20:00, , 66F
04/17 20:00, 66F
→
04/17 20:01, , 67F
04/17 20:01, 67F
噓
04/17 22:12, , 68F
04/17 22:12, 68F
噓
06/10 13:32, , 69F
06/10 13:32, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 7 篇):