Re: [情報] 莫雷又神了?老鷹遭火箭算計 今夏休城必已回收
※ 引述《jeromee ( 迷途小書僮)》之銘言:
: 不好意思,請問一下各位版友。
: 在前面的討論中一直提到他隊與湖人可以用S&T交易魔獸。
: 可是新版CBA不是規定
: Starting in 2013-14, teams above the apron cannot receive a player in a
: sign-and-trade transaction.
: 每個球季第一天就是當年的7月1號,所以2013-14球季的第一天應該就是2013.7.1。
: 以湖人薪資狀況來說,已經超越了apron,為什麼大家在討論時都認為他隊可以跟湖人
: 用S&T交易魔獸。
: 此外順便問一個問題請教版上高手,就字面上的意思,超過apron的球隊不能由S&T
: 獲取「球員」,但如果不是「球員」而是「TE」呢?如果湖人找到一支擁有20M薪資空間
: 的球隊可以吃下魔獸,用S&T之後湖人可以只獲得20M的TE而不需要球員介入,是否可行?
有一點不太對
http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q89
Starting in 2013-14, the team receiving the player cannot be above the
"apron" ($4 million above the tax level) after the trade
[中略]
1 These teams are free to send players to other teams in sign-and-trade
transactions, or to receive players in sign-and-trade transactions who
weren't signed-and-traded themselves. Also, the restriction applies
only to the sign-and-trade transaction itself -- teams are free to
acquire players who had been signed-and-traded in earlier transactions
受限制的是要被先簽後換的那名球員要去的球隊不能超過apron
--
願歲月靜好,現世安穩
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 223.136.234.167
推
02/22 15:00, , 1F
02/22 15:00, 1F
→
02/22 15:01, , 2F
02/22 15:01, 2F
→
02/22 15:01, , 3F
02/22 15:01, 3F
→
02/22 15:01, , 4F
02/22 15:01, 4F
推
02/22 15:01, , 5F
02/22 15:01, 5F
→
02/22 15:01, , 6F
02/22 15:01, 6F
→
02/22 15:05, , 7F
02/22 15:05, 7F
推
02/22 15:06, , 8F
02/22 15:06, 8F
推
02/22 15:08, , 9F
02/22 15:08, 9F
推
02/22 15:09, , 10F
02/22 15:09, 10F
→
02/22 15:10, , 11F
02/22 15:10, 11F
推
02/22 15:11, , 12F
02/22 15:11, 12F
→
02/22 15:12, , 13F
02/22 15:12, 13F
→
02/22 15:13, , 14F
02/22 15:13, 14F
推
02/22 15:19, , 15F
02/22 15:19, 15F
推
02/22 15:22, , 16F
02/22 15:22, 16F
→
02/22 15:23, , 17F
02/22 15:23, 17F
→
02/22 15:23, , 18F
02/22 15:23, 18F
→
02/22 15:23, , 19F
02/22 15:23, 19F
→
02/22 15:24, , 20F
02/22 15:24, 20F
推
02/22 15:25, , 21F
02/22 15:25, 21F
→
02/22 15:25, , 22F
02/22 15:25, 22F
→
02/22 15:28, , 23F
02/22 15:28, 23F
→
02/22 15:28, , 24F
02/22 15:28, 24F
推
02/22 15:29, , 25F
02/22 15:29, 25F
→
02/22 15:29, , 26F
02/22 15:29, 26F
推
02/22 15:54, , 27F
02/22 15:54, 27F
→
02/22 15:54, , 28F
02/22 15:54, 28F
推
02/22 15:58, , 29F
02/22 15:58, 29F
→
02/22 16:00, , 30F
02/22 16:00, 30F
→
02/22 16:02, , 31F
02/22 16:02, 31F
→
02/22 16:04, , 32F
02/22 16:04, 32F
→
02/22 16:06, , 33F
02/22 16:06, 33F
我看不太懂你說結論有問題是指甚麼
不過附註二的意思應該是說
當使用sign-and-trade之後, 該球隊的apron變成硬上限
該球隊將無法再使用中產特例或雙年特例去突破這個硬上限
→
02/22 16:11, , 34F
02/22 16:11, 34F
→
02/22 16:12, , 35F
02/22 16:12, 35F
→
02/22 16:13, , 36F
02/22 16:13, 36F
→
02/22 16:14, , 37F
02/22 16:14, 37F
Q97這段的意思是說, 如果球隊因為使用特例或sign-and-trade而受限於apron
而又想得到一名薪水+trade bouns將使球隊薪資超過apron的球員
這個交易不合法
→
02/22 16:14, , 38F
02/22 16:14, 38F
推
02/22 17:33, , 39F
02/22 17:33, 39F
※ 編輯: IBIZA 來自: 114.32.53.187 (04/30 22:45)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 6 篇):