[討論] 16:9 全螢幕手機,做不出來嗎?
看板MobileComm作者apple12413 (C'est la vie!)時間8年前 (2017/09/15 17:25)推噓26(26推 0噓 90→)留言116則, 25人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
2017下半年的旗艦逐漸出籠,指標性的iPhone 8和iPhone X也在前幾天發表了;Apple也
跟上2017的時代潮流在iPhone X採用了全螢幕的設計
當然瀏海這種東西有人喜歡有人不喜歡,說到底iPhone用上全面屏—作為全球認知度最高
的手機品牌—還是代表了這項技術會開始成為潮流
這項近年來最明顯的技術創新在S8 G6身上證明受到大眾歡迎,但是仔細一看目前推出的
全螢幕手機全部採用異態的螢幕長寬比例:
LG G6 →→→ 18:9
Samsung Galaxy S8/S8+ →→→ 18.5:9
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 →→→ 18.5:9
Sharp Aquos S2 →→→ 18:9
Xiaomi MIX →→→ 17:9
Xiaomi MIX 2 →→→ 17:9
Essential Phone PH-1 →→→ 19:10
Apple iPhone X →→→ 18:9
竟然沒有一隻全螢幕手機採用傳統的16:9螢幕?
不採用傳統的螢幕比例主要會造成一些影響:
1. 影片電影黑邊
2. App開發者調整對各螢幕比例優化難度增加
第三點比較主觀啦 3. 這麼長的螢幕真的醜QQ
在影視業者持續開發以為16:9比例的內容情況下,缺點似乎難以避免
究竟是為什麼廠商無法做出16:9長寬比例的全螢幕手機呢?
空間不足以放下所有零組件嗎?
如果16:9回不去了,各家OEM做出什麼樣的螢幕比例比較符合版友們的期待呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.38.108
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1505467511.A.844.html
→
09/15 17:26, , 1F
09/15 17:26, 1F
→
09/15 17:26, , 2F
09/15 17:26, 2F
→
09/15 17:27, , 3F
09/15 17:27, 3F
→
09/15 17:27, , 4F
09/15 17:27, 4F
→
09/15 17:28, , 5F
09/15 17:28, 5F
→
09/15 17:28, , 6F
09/15 17:28, 6F
其實目前的也是很奇怪啊,好長一隻xD
一直令人想起當年iPhone 5發表前 酸iPhone會越變越長的圖.....
推
09/15 17:29, , 7F
09/15 17:29, 7F
→
09/15 17:29, , 8F
09/15 17:29, 8F
廢料!?有卦嗎?
→
09/15 17:29, , 9F
09/15 17:29, 9F
→
09/15 17:29, , 10F
09/15 17:29, 10F
→
09/15 17:29, , 11F
09/15 17:29, 11F
→
09/15 17:30, , 12F
09/15 17:30, 12F
→
09/15 17:30, , 13F
09/15 17:30, 13F
→
09/15 17:30, , 14F
09/15 17:30, 14F
真的,不過其實各廠OEM也沒有錯啦..
畢竟本來的定義就是螢幕對角線長度?
覺得廠商應該要註明一下寬度約等於16:9螢幕的多少寬度,其實也可以用做宣傳用途嘛~
推
09/15 17:31, , 15F
09/15 17:31, 15F
→
09/15 17:32, , 16F
09/15 17:32, 16F
→
09/15 17:32, , 17F
09/15 17:32, 17F
其實螢幕比例異型化最大的問題是不統一?
如果要統一長寬比例版友覺得什麼比例比較好呢xD
→
09/15 17:33, , 18F
09/15 17:33, 18F
→
09/15 17:34, , 19F
09/15 17:34, 19F
→
09/15 17:34, , 20F
09/15 17:34, 20F
→
09/15 17:35, , 21F
09/15 17:35, 21F

→
09/15 17:35, , 22F
09/15 17:35, 22F

→
09/15 17:35, , 23F
09/15 17:35, 23F
→
09/15 17:36, , 24F
09/15 17:36, 24F
→
09/15 17:39, , 25F
09/15 17:39, 25F
覺得18:9 17:9都蠻不錯的~
不過Essential PH-1出來了之後最喜歡的比例是17:10哈哈
看起來要比s8的18.5:9自然太多啦
推
09/15 17:41, , 26F
09/15 17:41, 26F
→
09/15 17:41, , 27F
09/15 17:41, 27F
※ 編輯: apple12413 (223.136.38.108), 09/15/2017 17:43:17
→
09/15 17:46, , 28F
09/15 17:46, 28F
→
09/15 17:47, , 29F
09/15 17:47, 29F
→
09/15 17:48, , 30F
09/15 17:48, 30F
→
09/15 17:50, , 31F
09/15 17:50, 31F
還有 45 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
09/15 20:33, , 77F
09/15 20:33, 77F
→
09/15 20:35, , 78F
09/15 20:35, 78F
→
09/15 20:35, , 79F
09/15 20:35, 79F
→
09/15 20:35, , 80F
09/15 20:35, 80F
→
09/15 20:56, , 81F
09/15 20:56, 81F
→
09/15 20:57, , 82F
09/15 20:57, 82F
推
09/15 21:15, , 83F
09/15 21:15, 83F
→
09/15 21:15, , 84F
09/15 21:15, 84F
→
09/15 21:15, , 85F
09/15 21:15, 85F
→
09/15 21:15, , 86F
09/15 21:15, 86F
→
09/15 21:15, , 87F
09/15 21:15, 87F
→
09/15 21:23, , 88F
09/15 21:23, 88F
→
09/15 21:23, , 89F
09/15 21:23, 89F
推
09/15 21:48, , 90F
09/15 21:48, 90F
推
09/15 22:08, , 91F
09/15 22:08, 91F
→
09/15 22:08, , 92F
09/15 22:08, 92F
→
09/15 22:08, , 93F
09/15 22:08, 93F
→
09/15 22:08, , 94F
09/15 22:08, 94F
推
09/15 22:09, , 95F
09/15 22:09, 95F
→
09/15 22:17, , 96F
09/15 22:17, 96F
→
09/15 22:17, , 97F
09/15 22:17, 97F
推
09/15 22:45, , 98F
09/15 22:45, 98F
→
09/15 22:45, , 99F
09/15 22:45, 99F
推
09/15 22:55, , 100F
09/15 22:55, 100F
→
09/15 22:55, , 101F
09/15 22:55, 101F
推
09/15 23:22, , 102F
09/15 23:22, 102F
推
09/16 05:18, , 103F
09/16 05:18, 103F
推
09/16 07:05, , 104F
09/16 07:05, 104F
→
09/16 10:45, , 105F
09/16 10:45, 105F
→
09/16 10:45, , 106F
09/16 10:45, 106F
推
09/16 12:10, , 107F
09/16 12:10, 107F

推
09/16 12:12, , 108F
09/16 12:12, 108F
→
09/16 12:12, , 109F
09/16 12:12, 109F
推
09/16 17:32, , 110F
09/16 17:32, 110F
推
09/16 17:44, , 111F
09/16 17:44, 111F
→
09/16 17:46, , 112F
09/16 17:46, 112F
→
09/16 17:46, , 113F
09/16 17:46, 113F
→
09/16 17:46, , 114F
09/16 17:46, 114F
→
09/16 17:47, , 115F
09/16 17:47, 115F
→
09/16 17:47, , 116F
09/16 17:47, 116F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
26
116