[問題] 請問手機的「日系」到底是什麼形狀?
很好奇,
在板上會看到「日系」這個詞,都是圍繞著Sharp手機,主要論調是酸Sharp已經是郭董形狀,不是「日系」了
那到底什麼是「日系」的形狀呢?
「日系」這詞,我自己的理解是
1.「日本設計風格」(可能我錯了)
2.日文消費者喜歡的風格
但如果參照兩點,就會發現有矛盾
以第1點來說,
日系:Sony手機的風格(目前代表日本手機應是Sony了)
以第2點來說,
日系:Apple iPhone的風格,日本消費者最愛的手機
所以我想請問大家,
手機的「日系」到底實際上是指那些風格元素?也就是專屬於「日系」的設計元素
「日系」跟HTC,Asus,華為,小米的風格有什麼區別?
因為現在所有手機都長蠻像的
還是說「日系」指的是「功能」而非「外觀設計」?
還是說「日系」這詞其實根本不存在??
請教大家。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.28.170.108
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1504286423.A.2D0.html
→
09/02 01:21, , 1F
09/02 01:21, 1F
推
09/02 01:22, , 2F
09/02 01:22, 2F
→
09/02 01:22, , 3F
09/02 01:22, 3F
→
09/02 01:22, , 4F
09/02 01:22, 4F
→
09/02 01:22, , 5F
09/02 01:22, 5F
推
09/02 01:24, , 6F
09/02 01:24, 6F
推
09/02 01:28, , 7F
09/02 01:28, 7F
推
09/02 01:33, , 8F
09/02 01:33, 8F
推
09/02 01:33, , 9F
09/02 01:33, 9F
→
09/02 01:33, , 10F
09/02 01:33, 10F
推
09/02 01:34, , 11F
09/02 01:34, 11F
→
09/02 01:34, , 12F
09/02 01:34, 12F
推
09/02 01:39, , 13F
09/02 01:39, 13F
→
09/02 01:41, , 14F
09/02 01:41, 14F
推
09/02 01:48, , 15F
09/02 01:48, 15F
→
09/02 02:34, , 16F
09/02 02:34, 16F
推
09/02 03:09, , 17F
09/02 03:09, 17F
→
09/02 03:11, , 18F
09/02 03:11, 18F
→
09/02 03:12, , 19F
09/02 03:12, 19F
→
09/02 03:15, , 20F
09/02 03:15, 20F
推
09/02 04:04, , 21F
09/02 04:04, 21F
推
09/02 04:56, , 22F
09/02 04:56, 22F
推
09/02 06:25, , 23F
09/02 06:25, 23F
→
09/02 06:26, , 24F
09/02 06:26, 24F
→
09/02 06:27, , 25F
09/02 06:27, 25F
→
09/02 06:27, , 26F
09/02 06:27, 26F
→
09/02 06:28, , 27F
09/02 06:28, 27F
推
09/02 07:37, , 28F
09/02 07:37, 28F
推
09/02 07:45, , 29F
09/02 07:45, 29F
推
09/02 08:36, , 30F
09/02 08:36, 30F
推
09/02 08:46, , 31F
09/02 08:46, 31F
→
09/02 08:46, , 32F
09/02 08:46, 32F
推
09/02 09:59, , 33F
09/02 09:59, 33F
噓
09/02 10:12, , 34F
09/02 10:12, 34F
→
09/02 10:12, , 35F
09/02 10:12, 35F
→
09/02 10:13, , 36F
09/02 10:13, 36F
→
09/02 10:14, , 37F
09/02 10:14, 37F
推
09/02 10:29, , 38F
09/02 10:29, 38F
→
09/02 10:29, , 39F
09/02 10:29, 39F
推
09/02 10:31, , 40F
09/02 10:31, 40F
→
09/02 10:31, , 41F
09/02 10:31, 41F
推
09/02 11:08, , 42F
09/02 11:08, 42F
→
09/02 11:08, , 43F
09/02 11:08, 43F
推
09/02 12:16, , 44F
09/02 12:16, 44F
→
09/02 12:16, , 45F
09/02 12:16, 45F
→
09/02 12:34, , 46F
09/02 12:34, 46F
→
09/02 12:34, , 47F
09/02 12:34, 47F
→
09/02 12:46, , 48F
09/02 12:46, 48F
→
09/02 12:46, , 49F
09/02 12:46, 49F
→
09/02 12:46, , 50F
09/02 12:46, 50F
→
09/02 13:00, , 51F
09/02 13:00, 51F
→
09/02 13:02, , 52F
09/02 13:02, 52F
→
09/02 13:02, , 53F
09/02 13:02, 53F
→
09/02 13:10, , 54F
09/02 13:10, 54F
→
09/02 13:10, , 55F
09/02 13:10, 55F
→
09/02 13:14, , 56F
09/02 13:14, 56F
→
09/02 13:14, , 57F
09/02 13:14, 57F
→
09/02 14:14, , 58F
09/02 14:14, 58F
推
09/02 14:32, , 59F
09/02 14:32, 59F
推
09/02 16:46, , 60F
09/02 16:46, 60F
→
09/02 16:46, , 61F
09/02 16:46, 61F
→
09/02 19:28, , 62F
09/02 19:28, 62F
推
09/03 00:05, , 63F
09/03 00:05, 63F
推
09/03 11:07, , 64F
09/03 11:07, 64F
→
09/03 11:07, , 65F
09/03 11:07, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):