[問題] 三星曾經因為N或S系列賣得差,之後加碼送?
沒留意三星的行銷策略, 上次只有預購過NOTE7,
上次網站是當天就預購完畢,但這回不意外,一片罵聲連連之下
預購網站到現在都還可以預購,3色都可,哈哈
我的疑問是~會不會三星改變策略,新色上市時或之後正式開賣時加碼送
比現在預購更優惠?
該不會三星的S系列跟N系列沒賣差過吧?應該不可能吧?
單純行銷策略太差,會當下修正嗎?還是下一代才會修正?
想請教常買新機比較瞭解過去三星行銷手法的先進~
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.182.141.181
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1504272933.A.F65.html
※ 編輯: likewinnie (175.182.141.181), 09/01/2017 21:35:55
推
09/01 21:36, , 1F
09/01 21:36, 1F
→
09/01 21:36, , 2F
09/01 21:36, 2F
→
09/01 21:37, , 3F
09/01 21:37, 3F
→
09/01 21:37, , 4F
09/01 21:37, 4F
推
09/01 21:37, , 5F
09/01 21:37, 5F
推
09/01 21:37, , 6F
09/01 21:37, 6F
推
09/01 21:37, , 7F
09/01 21:37, 7F
→
09/01 21:38, , 8F
09/01 21:38, 8F
→
09/01 21:38, , 9F
09/01 21:38, 9F
→
09/01 21:38, , 10F
09/01 21:38, 10F
"預購"一波接一波?????? 那優惠有不一樣 有比較多的趨勢嗎?
→
09/01 21:38, , 11F
09/01 21:38, 11F
應該是綁約關係跟高資費加碼送原廠無限充電盤
※ 編輯: likewinnie (175.182.141.181), 09/01/2017 21:40:56
→
09/01 21:40, , 12F
09/01 21:40, 12F
S8是一開始賣不好嗎? 應該不會?因為有4000配件金耶
※ 編輯: likewinnie (175.182.141.181), 09/01/2017 21:41:51
推
09/01 21:41, , 13F
09/01 21:41, 13F
→
09/01 21:41, , 14F
09/01 21:41, 14F
→
09/01 21:41, , 15F
09/01 21:41, 15F
好心推~有違反再提醒我~我再刪~
→
09/01 21:41, , 16F
09/01 21:41, 16F
感謝D大跟J大的分享,總之就是金額遞減了~
推
09/01 21:41, , 17F
09/01 21:41, 17F
感覺討論滿冷清的啊~覺得銷量應該跟N7差很多很多~
推
09/01 21:42, , 18F
09/01 21:42, 18F
它一去不復返......XDDD
※ 編輯: likewinnie (175.182.141.181), 09/01/2017 21:44:37
→
09/01 21:42, , 19F
09/01 21:42, 19F
推
09/01 21:42, , 20F
09/01 21:42, 20F
→
09/01 21:43, , 21F
09/01 21:43, 21F
→
09/01 21:43, , 22F
09/01 21:43, 22F
現在就是怕之後送更差,有點猶豫
但現在N8送的已經很差,之後還能更差嗎?
搞不好改送無限充電盤大家更想要吧.
現在先預購不就更虧? 一整個拿不定主意..因為顏色又沒很好看..
推
09/01 21:44, , 23F
09/01 21:44, 23F
→
09/01 21:44, , 24F
09/01 21:44, 24F
→
09/01 21:45, , 25F
09/01 21:45, 25F
推
09/01 21:45, , 26F
09/01 21:45, 26F
→
09/01 21:45, , 27F
09/01 21:45, 27F
還是因為大家想買的是S8+ 所以S8沒什麼人討論?
※ 編輯: likewinnie (175.182.141.181), 09/01/2017 21:50:09
→
09/01 21:46, , 28F
09/01 21:46, 28F
→
09/01 21:46, , 29F
09/01 21:46, 29F
→
09/01 21:46, , 30F
09/01 21:46, 30F
還有 54 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
09/01 22:12, , 85F
09/01 22:12, 85F
→
09/01 22:13, , 86F
09/01 22:13, 86F
→
09/01 22:13, , 87F
09/01 22:13, 87F
→
09/01 22:14, , 88F
09/01 22:14, 88F
推
09/01 22:14, , 89F
09/01 22:14, 89F
→
09/01 22:14, , 90F
09/01 22:14, 90F
→
09/01 22:15, , 91F
09/01 22:15, 91F
→
09/01 22:15, , 92F
09/01 22:15, 92F
→
09/01 22:15, , 93F
09/01 22:15, 93F
→
09/01 22:16, , 94F
09/01 22:16, 94F
推
09/01 22:17, , 95F
09/01 22:17, 95F
→
09/01 22:17, , 96F
09/01 22:17, 96F
→
09/01 22:18, , 97F
09/01 22:18, 97F
→
09/01 22:19, , 98F
09/01 22:19, 98F
→
09/01 22:22, , 99F
09/01 22:22, 99F
→
09/01 22:23, , 100F
09/01 22:23, 100F
推
09/01 22:23, , 101F
09/01 22:23, 101F
→
09/01 22:24, , 102F
09/01 22:24, 102F
推
09/01 22:25, , 103F
09/01 22:25, 103F
→
09/01 22:26, , 104F
09/01 22:26, 104F
推
09/01 22:47, , 105F
09/01 22:47, 105F
→
09/01 22:53, , 106F
09/01 22:53, 106F
推
09/01 22:55, , 107F
09/01 22:55, 107F
推
09/01 23:15, , 108F
09/01 23:15, 108F
→
09/01 23:53, , 109F
09/01 23:53, 109F
→
09/01 23:54, , 110F
09/01 23:54, 110F
→
09/01 23:54, , 111F
09/01 23:54, 111F
推
09/01 23:57, , 112F
09/01 23:57, 112F
→
09/01 23:57, , 113F
09/01 23:57, 113F
推
09/02 00:55, , 114F
09/02 00:55, 114F
→
09/02 01:41, , 115F
09/02 01:41, 115F
推
09/02 02:07, , 116F
09/02 02:07, 116F
→
09/02 02:07, , 117F
09/02 02:07, 117F
推
09/02 02:53, , 118F
09/02 02:53, 118F
→
09/02 02:54, , 119F
09/02 02:54, 119F
噓
09/02 03:15, , 120F
09/02 03:15, 120F
推
09/02 13:23, , 121F
09/02 13:23, 121F
推
09/02 13:55, , 122F
09/02 13:55, 122F
→
09/02 14:26, , 123F
09/02 14:26, 123F
推
09/02 15:28, , 124F
09/02 15:28, 124F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):