Re: [問題] 有國外網友對U11的評價嗎？
※ 引述《game1398 (奇異)》之銘言：
: 其實外國人，尤其歐美人收入比台灣人多的多
: 比較便宜對他們來說不怎麼在意，只會覺得「哦！比較便宜」 沒了
: 比較偏向是終於肯推出一款還OK的手機，但不到手機板那麼熱烈就是
: 畢竟品牌...
: 真的是該給的都給齊了
: 有防水，有評測最高分相機，有ufs2.1，有平價，有下一世代的概念側框感應
: ，有雙卡，且是made in taiwan
轉貼一些+隨便翻
===========================================================
官方Youtube廣告留言:
Chris Fokjohn 7小時前
Looks like a poor use of space to me
對我而言 好像沒好好利用空間
poor use of space不知道怎麼翻，
"浪費空間"還是"硬體位置配置不良"...
反正就那個意思，從那個評測之後就變成一個專門酸hTC的梗
詳情請見Marques Brownlee 評測HTC UU
(https://goo.gl/uel4UZ
Lutfil Khakim 7小時前
HTC has made a beautiful phone, always!!!
HTC總是做漂亮的手機!!!
David Martin 6小時前
This is nothing special. Again, poor use of space to some degree....
沒什麼特別的。再一次，從某些角度來看仍然"poor use of space"
Bogdan 6小時前
how to file bankruptcy: a guide by HTC
"教你如何宣告破產" by HTC
socheat yin 5小時前
Good bye htc
再見htc
T Blanco7 小時前
where is the beautiful aluminium body HTC :-/ ?
HTC漂亮的鋁製機身跑哪裡去啦:-/ ?
Garrett7 小時前
Is this the same phone you removed the headphone jack from?
這一樣是那種拿掉耳機孔的手機嗎?
Renatra Hafidh 2小時前
I miss the metal design, i liked it more than the glass tbh.
我懷念金屬設計，老實說比起玻璃我更喜歡金屬設計
Wallenst3in 7小時前
WOW HTC back at it !
哇HTC扳回一城 !
(下面有人回"確切來說，扳回啥?"xD)
hasoon0ab 4小時前
What's the point of using glass without wireless charging?!, and then they
will price it at +700 !!
用玻璃背殼卻沒有無線充電的意義在哪裡?!然後他們竟然要價超過700元 !!
scootosan 1小時前
well at least there isn't a finger print sensor next to the camera like some
other phone
至少它的指紋辨識不是在相機旁邊
Liao Ssin 1小時前
Seriously people, HTC has finally put everything everyone expected them to
have in their flagship. Physical buttons, water resistance, Boom sound
speakers, SD Card slut, Good camera...everything that makes a phone great is
here. Yet people still complain this phone is not beautiful enough(While
there's G6...), small battery(S8?iPhone7?), big bazel. People praise Nexuses
so much because their camera and software and U11 is the phone with all the
additional features Nexuses dreams of but would never happen, what's the
logic behind this? If you want a phone with good material, great
camera(probably the best now), good battery life, good speakers, HTC U11 is
the way to go.
認真講，HTC終於把所有大家期待的東西都放進它們的旗艦了，
實體按鍵、防水、Boom揚聲喇叭、SD卡插槽、好的相機....任何好東西都在這了。
然後你們還在嫌不夠美?(反觀G6.....)小電量?(S8?iPhone7?)、粗邊框。
人們吹捧Nexus因為相機和軟體，然後U11有著額外連Nexus們想做卻沒做到的夢幻功能
這邏輯在哪?如果你想要一隻好手機有著好的相機(或許是目前最強)、好的續航、好的喇
叭
，那HTC U11做得非常好。
chasedoe 1小時前 (已編輯)
Looks ugly to me. Why dont they make Aluminium unibody..... Com'on HTC you
did that the first!
PS. I'm not HTC hater herer. I had HTC M8 GPE
對我來說看起來很醜。為什麼不做鋁製機身?拜託HTC你們曾經是第一個這麼做的欸！
PS我不是HTC黑 我有一台M8
Felipe Chez 2小時前
that is one beautiful phone. But I don't have excuses to change mi htc 10
這是一台漂亮的手機，但我找不到理由換掉我的htc 10
=========================================================
XDA新聞稿留言:
AndyYan ‧ 8 hours ago
For U, not for me.
為你，但不是為我。
Huge bezels for such a small screen (5.5), and very high price.
yes. small IPS screen! :(
and with glass back??? seriously??
ugm, HTC, what are you doing???
i didn't even bother to check whether it has unwanted curved edges.
粗邊框小螢幕(5.5吋)超高價
對，小IPS螢幕!
然後玻璃背殼???你認真??
恩，HTC你到底在幹嘛???我甚至沒有費心去檢查它是否有我不想要的曲面螢幕
AndyYan lisbon2004 ‧ 19 minutes ago
Technically I'm only bothered by the arrogant front design (bezels).
Unfortunately that's half a deal-breaker for me.
IPS is actually seen as a perk by many, including me. As for the price, at
least in our region, compared to what was previously marked by HTC, this one
is much more reasonable, and in line with other SD835 flagships.
我只在意那自大的正面設計(邊框)
很不幸地這勸退了我一半想買的衝動
IPS其實對很多人來說只是附加的，包括我
至於這價格，在我的地區而言相對於之前HTC的訂價算是合理很多了，
尤其是和線上其他家的SD835旗艦相比。
RogerF81 ‧ 9 hours ago
No stereo speakers, no headphone jack, glass back, bezels -> meh
沒有立體揚聲喇叭，沒有耳機孔，玻璃背殼，邊框->嗯。
ivicask RogerF81 ‧ 7 hours ago
It has stereo speakers same as HTC10 did, they are just not front facing as
on M9 or M8, still it sounds amazing..
他有立體揚聲喇叭跟10一樣只是不像M9或M8那樣擺在正面、聽起來還是很棒的。
domsch1988 ‧ 7 hours ago
I can't even express how boring and uninspiring the smartphone landscape has
become. Another Phone with the same, irrelevant hardware Update. No one cares
whether it's a SD835 or 821. Day to day they perform identical. 4GB Ram,
fine, no one cares really.
Not a single flagship offers compelling reason to buy it. It's all gimmicks
nowadays. Pressure sensitive screen? Come on. 18:9, might be nice but really,
not that big of a deal. Slimmer bezels? After having seen the Mi Mix all else
is just trying hard. Samsung is out for Bixby alone. G6 is so uninspiring i
can't even put it in words.
I have a OP 3T. I am eligible for a new contract with a phone for free and
can't find a single one i'd like to have. for over 10 years i had contracts
to subsidize the phone. 2017 is the year where i'll be going with a way
cheaper contract without a phone.
Why would anyone pay over 700€ for another phone, that does exactly the same
as the one from 2 years ago, with the same specs (basically), the same
display, smaller battery and a slightly better camera? I just don't get it
anymore...
我不知道怎麼表達這支手機設計有多無聊、多平淡
其他手機也是相同的硬體升級，沒人在意它是835還是821，
日復一日大家都做一樣的東西，4GB Ram很好但真的沒人在意
沒有任何一台旗艦機有拿出新東西值得購買，都是噱頭。
壓力感測?拜託。18:9或許不錯但其實也不怎麼樣。
更細的邊框?從你們看過Mi Mix之後其他家都只是在努力嘗試而已
三星只有Bixby比較特別、G6無聊到我無話可說
我有一台OP 3T然後約滿了卻找不到一台滿意的手機能換，超過十年我只要約滿就購機
2017我考慮換成低資費的合約然後不買任何手機了
為什麼會有人考慮花超過700歐元換一隻功能跟兩年前幾乎一模一樣的手機、
甚至一樣的儲存容量、一樣的顯示螢幕、更小的電池容量、只為了好一點點的相機?
我真的搞不懂了。
JaredTamana ‧ 2 hours ago
Literally no one cares, HTC. Just keep digging your grave.
老實說沒人在意HTC。只是在繼續挖深自己的墳墓。
MickyFoley@XDA ‧ 4 hours ago
￡649 / 757€ for THIS? Nope, I'm oUt.
"這東西"要649英鎊/757歐元? 不，我退出。
11prathmesh ‧ 5 hours ago
U for Ugly
U是Ugly(醜)
jay ‧ 2 hours ago
is not a bad phone. question is about updates? since HTC does not sell it
carrier locked maybe we getting updates faster
不差的手機。問題是後續更新?從HTC不再上鎖後或許我們可以快一點得到更新。
Bleeding-Edge-Armour ‧ 5 hours ago
Does it squeak like a rubber duck too?
它擠起來也是像塑膠鴨子嗎?
pfufle ‧ 8 hours ago
I'm just going to wait for the second generation of the Google Pixel which
fixes its mediocre design.
我在等下一個世代的Google Pixel可以修正現在手機的平庸設計。
Latheryin ‧ 9 hours ago
HTC pushed out a good device from the looks of things. A bit gimmicky but we
will have to see. The home button though
HTC推出了一台看起來不錯的裝置，有點花俏但我們可以觀察看看。雖然它有home鍵
===============================================================
Pocketnow的Youtube介紹影片:
xX_BMO22swegmachine420_Xx10 小時前
Am I the only one who thinks this actually might be a good smartphone?
我是唯一個認為這實際上可能是台好智慧型手機的人嗎?
Tejas Karande11 小時前 (已編輯)
HTC should just kill itself!
Why you ask? HTC squeezed the headphone jack so hard that it disappeared.
Ugly bezels. Squeezing won't be case friendly in most cases (pun intended
) and it should be handled with care. HTC is extinct.
HTC應該去自殺。
你問為什麼?他們"擠"耳機孔太用力擠到都消失了。
醜邊框。壓力感測大多數情況下對手機殼都不友善(這裡用了"case"的雙關)
而且必須很小心的拿著。HTC正在滅絕。
Grey Matter11 小時前
wondering how many phones will slip and fall while trying to "squeeze "
好奇有多少手機會不小心掉落當大家試著"擠"它
Diwakar Serala9 小時前
one sentence. Waste of space. MKBHD go for it...
一句話。浪費空間，MKBHD上吧...
Samuel David Timboko11 小時前
#RIPSamsung
#三星安息吧
VTEC kick in10 小時前
This phone really doesn't hold an candle to the G6 or S8 its more expensive
than an G6 and is the same price as in S8.. they haven't changed sense since
the one M7 and it's starting to look dated and it's still rocking an LCD
screen at 700 dollars there's no headphone jack this honestly is kind of
getting pathetic to watch
這手機沒辦法跟G6或S8相提並論，它比G6貴和S8同價..他們從M7之後並沒有改變過Sense
導致現在看起來有點過時，而且定價700元還在用LCD螢幕、沒有耳機孔，
老實講看完有點可悲
Ahmad Hussain11 小時前
I am honestly impressed.
However I wish the skin was tweaked a bit more. Because the skin doesn't
really complement the liquid like feel.
老實說我印象深刻。無論如何，希望表面可以再調整一下
因為它看起來沒有真正充滿液體的感覺。
fin winn10 小時前
Idk why everyone hates htc. Even if they try to prove themselves people pick
out a single useless shit and hate on htc. i found this phone quite
interesting (atleast more than Samsung). This phone is a major improvement
from the U ultra
我不知道為啥大家都討厭htc
他們甚至試著用單一件沒用的狗屎來證明自己的挑剔觀點並且黑htc。
我對這手機相當感興趣(至少大於三星)這隻手機和U ultra相比有很大的進步。
Sharon Mathew9 小時前
HTC died after the M8
HTC從M8之後就死了。
WOOD10 小時前
this phone will not sell well
這手機不會賣得好。
zaimin92 10小時前
This phone scored the highest mark on DXOMark with 90. Really looking forward
for its camera test.
這手機再DxOMark拿到最高分90分，真的很期待它的相機測試。
Papa Kofi Y9 小時前
I don't understand why everyone is so obsessed with headphone jacks
nowadays!!!
我真的不懂為啥現在每個人都這麼著迷於耳機孔!!!
Tech Incorporated10 小時前
It shines brighter than my future..
它看起來比我的未來還亮..
====================================================================
看了幾個論壇、網站
反正就有人覺得漂亮、有人說醜
有人覺得貴、有人覺得便宜
好壞參半啦。
沒有引起什麼太大的討論，
覺得沒什麼興趣的人居多。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.233.209.29
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1494953686.A.575.html
推
05/17 00:56, , 1F
05/17 00:56, 1F
推
05/17 00:57, , 2F
05/17 00:57, 2F
推
05/17 00:57, , 3F
05/17 00:57, 3F
→
05/17 00:57, , 4F
05/17 00:57, 4F
→
05/17 00:58, , 5F
05/17 00:58, 5F
推
05/17 00:58, , 6F
05/17 00:58, 6F
推
05/17 00:58, , 7F
05/17 00:58, 7F
→
05/17 00:59, , 8F
05/17 00:59, 8F
→
05/17 00:59, , 9F
05/17 00:59, 9F
推
05/17 00:59, , 10F
05/17 00:59, 10F
推
05/17 01:00, , 11F
05/17 01:00, 11F
→
05/17 01:00, , 12F
05/17 01:00, 12F
推
05/17 01:01, , 13F
05/17 01:01, 13F
推
05/17 01:01, , 14F
05/17 01:01, 14F
依然嫌貴的人還真的不少
推
05/17 01:02, , 15F
05/17 01:02, 15F
→
05/17 01:02, , 16F
05/17 01:02, 16F
喜歡金屬+1
推
05/17 01:02, , 17F
05/17 01:02, 17F
推
05/17 01:02, , 18F
05/17 01:02, 18F
推
05/17 01:03, , 19F
05/17 01:03, 19F
→
05/17 01:03, , 20F
05/17 01:03, 20F
推
05/17 01:04, , 21F
05/17 01:04, 21F
→
05/17 01:04, , 22F
05/17 01:04, 22F
→
05/17 01:04, , 23F
05/17 01:04, 23F
→
05/17 01:04, , 24F
05/17 01:04, 24F
推
05/17 01:04, , 25F
05/17 01:04, 25F
推
05/17 01:04, , 26F
05/17 01:04, 26F
→
05/17 01:05, , 27F
05/17 01:05, 27F
→
05/17 01:06, , 28F
05/17 01:06, 28F
→
05/17 01:06, , 29F
05/17 01:06, 29F
正常啦手機都還沒人拿到手，當然主觀，更何況是網友留言能多客觀?xD
推
05/17 01:06, , 30F
05/17 01:06, 30F
→
05/17 01:06, , 31F
05/17 01:06, 31F
→
05/17 01:06, , 32F
05/17 01:06, 32F
→
05/17 01:06, , 33F
05/17 01:06, 33F
推
05/17 01:07, , 34F
05/17 01:07, 34F
→
05/17 01:07, , 35F
05/17 01:07, 35F
推
05/17 01:07, , 36F
05/17 01:07, 36F
還有 147 則推文
還有 7 段內文
推
05/17 08:00, , 184F
05/17 08:00, 184F
→
05/17 08:00, , 185F
05/17 08:00, 185F
→
05/17 08:00, , 186F
05/17 08:00, 186F
推
05/17 08:17, , 187F
05/17 08:17, 187F
推
05/17 08:31, , 188F
05/17 08:31, 188F
推
05/17 08:49, , 189F
05/17 08:49, 189F
→
05/17 08:49, , 190F
05/17 08:49, 190F
推
05/17 08:56, , 191F
05/17 08:56, 191F
推
05/17 08:57, , 192F
05/17 08:57, 192F
→
05/17 08:57, , 193F
05/17 08:57, 193F
→
05/17 08:57, , 194F
05/17 08:57, 194F
推
05/17 08:58, , 195F
05/17 08:58, 195F
推
05/17 09:05, , 196F
05/17 09:05, 196F
→
05/17 09:05, , 197F
05/17 09:05, 197F
推
05/17 09:19, , 198F
05/17 09:19, 198F
→
05/17 09:21, , 199F
05/17 09:21, 199F
→
05/17 09:21, , 200F
05/17 09:21, 200F
推
05/17 09:22, , 201F
05/17 09:22, 201F
推
05/17 09:23, , 202F
05/17 09:23, 202F
→
05/17 09:23, , 203F
05/17 09:23, 203F
推
05/17 09:27, , 204F
05/17 09:27, 204F
推
05/17 09:36, , 205F
05/17 09:36, 205F
※ 編輯: Cactusman (118.233.209.29), 05/17/2017 09:59:59
推
05/17 10:06, , 206F
05/17 10:06, 206F
推
05/17 10:07, , 207F
05/17 10:07, 207F
推
05/17 10:17, , 208F
05/17 10:17, 208F
推
05/17 10:26, , 209F
05/17 10:26, 209F
→
05/17 11:01, , 210F
05/17 11:01, 210F
推
05/17 11:04, , 211F
05/17 11:04, 211F
推
05/17 11:18, , 212F
05/17 11:18, 212F
推
05/17 11:24, , 213F
05/17 11:24, 213F
→
05/17 11:28, , 214F
05/17 11:28, 214F
→
05/17 11:28, , 215F
05/17 11:28, 215F
推
05/17 11:36, , 216F
05/17 11:36, 216F
推
05/17 11:54, , 217F
05/17 11:54, 217F
推
05/17 12:37, , 218F
05/17 12:37, 218F
推
05/17 13:44, , 219F
05/17 13:44, 219F
→
05/18 01:14, , 220F
05/18 01:14, 220F
→
05/18 01:15, , 221F
05/18 01:15, 221F
推
05/18 08:47, , 222F
05/18 08:47, 222F
討論串 (同標題文章)