Re: [問題] 台灣很難達到中國行動支付方便的程度嗎
※ 引述《kingfsg7326 (赭霞一肩天下難)》之銘言:
: 在對岸一二線城市中,行動支付是非常普遍的工具
: 有整合公司將支付工具整合
: 在國內達到高速的效率,商機無限
: 相較於台灣,遲遲沒有什麼下文
: 但在地理上台灣地狹人稠的優勢並沒有被太大發揮
: 使得這項方便的工具被擱置了許久
: 也不知是因為技術問題還是政策,無法實現
: 讓台灣看起來像個落後國家
: 台灣真的無法達到像大陸那樣方便嗎?
: EX: 手機一鍵購物、一鍵繳款、一鍵買單....
不難啊, 如果明天PCHOME宣布
用支付連在PCHOME商店街跟露天買東西
免手續費、即時到帳、享履約保證、還給折扣
我敢說, 不用一年, 支付連用戶少說上百萬
中國的行動支付客群最早是繼承自支付寶的網路三方支付
其他兩家都是支付寶成功之後才推出來搶客人的
而支付寶的網路支付客群, 就是阿里巴巴用淘寶養出來的
用支付寶在淘寶買東西, 就是免手續費、即時到帳、享履約保證、還給折扣
用信用卡, 除了沒折扣, 還要收3%手續費, 是你你會不用支付寶付嗎?
到了行動時代, 馬雲也是用同樣的方法
其實很多商家每年本來就都會有一些促銷活動
支付寶挾著幾億的用戶, 商家只要願意給折扣
阿里巴巴就讓他們可以在支付寶上打廣告, 商家當然都會願意給啊
用現金吃肯德基原價, 用支付寶APP八折, 是你你用哪個付?
於是支付寶用戶越多, 折扣跟優惠也就越多
如果支付連在台灣也有幾百萬用戶
詹宏志去找麥當勞
說你給九折我就讓你在支付連APP首頁放廣告, 麥當勞會不同意嗎?
只可惜....
我只能說馬雲跟詹宏志的眼界差太多
--
別欺負我不識字,明明就是蝠可夢,甚麼寶可夢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.81.61
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1473430646.A.C28.html
※ 編輯: IBIZA (122.116.81.61), 09/09/2016 22:30:28
推
09/09 22:30, , 1F
09/09 22:30, 1F
→
09/09 22:31, , 2F
09/09 22:31, 2F
→
09/09 22:31, , 3F
09/09 22:31, 3F
→
09/09 22:31, , 4F
09/09 22:31, 4F
推
09/09 22:31, , 5F
09/09 22:31, 5F
推
09/09 22:34, , 6F
09/09 22:34, 6F
→
09/09 22:34, , 7F
09/09 22:34, 7F
→
09/09 22:34, , 8F
09/09 22:34, 8F
→
09/09 22:35, , 9F
09/09 22:35, 9F
→
09/09 22:37, , 10F
09/09 22:37, 10F
→
09/09 22:37, , 11F
09/09 22:37, 11F
→
09/09 22:38, , 12F
09/09 22:38, 12F
推
09/09 22:38, , 13F
09/09 22:38, 13F
→
09/09 22:39, , 14F
09/09 22:39, 14F
→
09/09 22:39, , 15F
09/09 22:39, 15F
→
09/09 22:39, , 16F
09/09 22:39, 16F
推
09/09 22:40, , 17F
09/09 22:40, 17F
→
09/09 22:43, , 18F
09/09 22:43, 18F
→
09/09 22:46, , 19F
09/09 22:46, 19F
推
09/09 22:57, , 20F
09/09 22:57, 20F
→
09/09 22:57, , 21F
09/09 22:57, 21F
→
09/09 22:57, , 22F
09/09 22:57, 22F
→
09/09 22:58, , 23F
09/09 22:58, 23F
→
09/09 22:58, , 24F
09/09 22:58, 24F
→
09/09 22:58, , 25F
09/09 22:58, 25F
→
09/09 22:59, , 26F
09/09 22:59, 26F
→
09/09 23:01, , 27F
09/09 23:01, 27F
→
09/09 23:02, , 28F
09/09 23:02, 28F
→
09/09 23:02, , 29F
09/09 23:02, 29F
→
09/09 23:03, , 30F
09/09 23:03, 30F
→
09/09 23:03, , 31F
09/09 23:03, 31F
→
09/09 23:03, , 32F
09/09 23:03, 32F
推
09/09 23:04, , 33F
09/09 23:04, 33F
→
09/09 23:04, , 34F
09/09 23:04, 34F
→
09/09 23:05, , 35F
09/09 23:05, 35F
→
09/09 23:05, , 36F
09/09 23:05, 36F
→
09/09 23:05, , 37F
09/09 23:05, 37F
→
09/09 23:15, , 38F
09/09 23:15, 38F
→
09/09 23:15, , 39F
09/09 23:15, 39F
還有 51 則推文
→
09/10 00:00, , 91F
09/10 00:00, 91F
→
09/10 00:01, , 92F
09/10 00:01, 92F
→
09/10 00:01, , 93F
09/10 00:01, 93F
推
09/10 00:03, , 94F
09/10 00:03, 94F
推
09/10 00:07, , 95F
09/10 00:07, 95F
→
09/10 00:08, , 96F
09/10 00:08, 96F
→
09/10 00:08, , 97F
09/10 00:08, 97F
推
09/10 00:09, , 98F
09/10 00:09, 98F
→
09/10 00:09, , 99F
09/10 00:09, 99F
→
09/10 00:09, , 100F
09/10 00:09, 100F
→
09/10 00:09, , 101F
09/10 00:09, 101F
→
09/10 00:09, , 102F
09/10 00:09, 102F
→
09/10 00:09, , 103F
09/10 00:09, 103F
→
09/10 00:09, , 104F
09/10 00:09, 104F
→
09/10 00:09, , 105F
09/10 00:09, 105F
→
09/10 00:09, , 106F
09/10 00:09, 106F
→
09/10 00:09, , 107F
09/10 00:09, 107F
→
09/10 00:09, , 108F
09/10 00:09, 108F
→
09/10 00:09, , 109F
09/10 00:09, 109F
推
09/10 00:13, , 110F
09/10 00:13, 110F
→
09/10 00:13, , 111F
09/10 00:13, 111F
→
09/10 00:14, , 112F
09/10 00:14, 112F
→
09/10 00:14, , 113F
09/10 00:14, 113F
→
09/10 00:15, , 114F
09/10 00:15, 114F
→
09/10 00:15, , 115F
09/10 00:15, 115F
→
09/10 00:15, , 116F
09/10 00:15, 116F
→
09/10 00:16, , 117F
09/10 00:16, 117F
→
09/10 00:16, , 118F
09/10 00:16, 118F
→
09/10 00:18, , 119F
09/10 00:18, 119F
→
09/10 00:18, , 120F
09/10 00:18, 120F
→
09/10 01:47, , 121F
09/10 01:47, 121F
→
09/10 01:47, , 122F
09/10 01:47, 122F
→
09/10 06:17, , 123F
09/10 06:17, 123F
推
09/10 06:23, , 124F
09/10 06:23, 124F
→
09/10 06:23, , 125F
09/10 06:23, 125F
→
09/10 06:24, , 126F
09/10 06:24, 126F
→
09/10 06:25, , 127F
09/10 06:25, 127F
→
09/10 06:25, , 128F
09/10 06:25, 128F
噓
09/10 11:34, , 129F
09/10 11:34, 129F
推
09/10 14:03, , 130F
09/10 14:03, 130F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 43 篇):