Re: [討論] 三星的最大缺點
下文可能和原文無關,僅小弟借標題下的推文提出一些淺見
其實我一直不知道酸別人用韓貨的心態是什麼
我並沒有很喜歡韓國;但我也不討厭他
選擇使用三星的原因僅僅是因為硬體給很足、S6之後外觀改造
起初對於三星我一直覺得手機很強,但我不會特別想買
這陣子決定買的原因只是因為slag的嚴重性已經在可接受範圍內罷了
不必擔心被白眼,反正只是就事論事,三星的手機的確很強悍,但軟體比不上他廠
況且與其說「我不願意資敵」倒不如提升自己國家的實力比較實在
我一直看不下去手機板風向的問題
「皇家子龍就爛啊」、「三星不意外」、「支持hTC支持國貨」等
有時候針對板友的需求提出意見不是才是治根的方法嗎?
到最後只要標題出現三星、Zen、LG,底下的推文免不了幾句酸言酸語
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.141.122.0
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1468598180.A.F15.html
→
07/15 23:57, , 1F
07/15 23:57, 1F
→
07/15 23:58, , 2F
07/15 23:58, 2F
推
07/16 00:17, , 3F
07/16 00:17, 3F
→
07/16 00:17, , 4F
07/16 00:17, 4F
→
07/16 00:17, , 5F
07/16 00:17, 5F
推
07/16 00:19, , 6F
07/16 00:19, 6F
→
07/16 00:19, , 7F
07/16 00:19, 7F
推
07/16 00:20, , 8F
07/16 00:20, 8F
推
07/16 00:22, , 9F
07/16 00:22, 9F
→
07/16 00:22, , 10F
07/16 00:22, 10F
推
07/16 00:23, , 11F
07/16 00:23, 11F
→
07/16 00:23, , 12F
07/16 00:23, 12F
→
07/16 00:23, , 13F
07/16 00:23, 13F
→
07/16 00:23, , 14F
07/16 00:23, 14F
推
07/16 00:28, , 15F
07/16 00:28, 15F
→
07/16 00:28, , 16F
07/16 00:28, 16F
→
07/16 00:29, , 17F
07/16 00:29, 17F
推
07/16 00:30, , 18F
07/16 00:30, 18F
推
07/16 00:35, , 19F
07/16 00:35, 19F
→
07/16 00:36, , 20F
07/16 00:36, 20F
推
07/16 00:41, , 21F
07/16 00:41, 21F
推
07/16 00:41, , 22F
07/16 00:41, 22F
→
07/16 00:41, , 23F
07/16 00:41, 23F
→
07/16 00:41, , 24F
07/16 00:41, 24F
推
07/16 00:48, , 25F
07/16 00:48, 25F
→
07/16 00:50, , 26F
07/16 00:50, 26F
→
07/16 00:50, , 27F
07/16 00:50, 27F
其實呢我只是單純發揮淺見,並非單單針對三星而已
推
07/16 00:52, , 28F
07/16 00:52, 28F
→
07/16 00:52, , 29F
07/16 00:52, 29F
→
07/16 00:52, , 30F
07/16 00:52, 30F
推
07/16 00:58, , 31F
07/16 00:58, 31F
推
07/16 00:58, , 32F
07/16 00:58, 32F
→
07/16 00:58, , 33F
07/16 00:58, 33F
→
07/16 00:58, , 34F
07/16 00:58, 34F
→
07/16 00:58, , 35F
07/16 00:58, 35F
推
07/16 01:03, , 36F
07/16 01:03, 36F
→
07/16 01:03, , 37F
07/16 01:03, 37F
→
07/16 01:03, , 38F
07/16 01:03, 38F
還有 51 則推文
還有 9 段內文
推
07/16 07:20, , 90F
07/16 07:20, 90F
→
07/16 07:20, , 91F
07/16 07:20, 91F
Sony續航其實很不錯我老實說...
相機也不差啊,只是沒有很突出而已
推
07/16 07:56, , 92F
07/16 07:56, 92F
→
07/16 07:59, , 93F
07/16 07:59, 93F
→
07/16 08:00, , 94F
07/16 08:00, 94F
推
07/16 08:09, , 95F
07/16 08:09, 95F
→
07/16 08:09, , 96F
07/16 08:09, 96F
→
07/16 08:09, , 97F
07/16 08:09, 97F
推
07/16 09:17, , 98F
07/16 09:17, 98F
→
07/16 09:17, , 99F
07/16 09:17, 99F
→
07/16 09:17, , 100F
07/16 09:17, 100F
推
07/16 10:01, , 101F
07/16 10:01, 101F
→
07/16 10:03, , 102F
07/16 10:03, 102F
推
07/16 10:12, , 103F
07/16 10:12, 103F
→
07/16 10:31, , 104F
07/16 10:31, 104F
→
07/16 11:00, , 105F
07/16 11:00, 105F
→
07/16 11:14, , 106F
07/16 11:14, 106F
→
07/16 11:15, , 107F
07/16 11:15, 107F
其實我內文是廣義而言,並沒有針對三星
請不要誤會
推
07/16 11:18, , 108F
07/16 11:18, 108F
會的好嗎!!!
→
07/16 11:38, , 109F
07/16 11:38, 109F
※ 編輯: lee457088 (1.168.17.220), 07/16/2016 12:11:10
→
07/16 12:27, , 110F
07/16 12:27, 110F
→
07/16 13:03, , 111F
07/16 13:03, 111F
推
07/16 14:18, , 112F
07/16 14:18, 112F
推
07/16 15:51, , 113F
07/16 15:51, 113F
→
07/16 15:52, , 114F
07/16 15:52, 114F
→
07/16 16:09, , 115F
07/16 16:09, 115F
→
07/16 16:09, , 116F
07/16 16:09, 116F
推
07/16 16:50, , 117F
07/16 16:50, 117F
推
07/16 17:28, , 118F
07/16 17:28, 118F
→
07/16 17:28, , 119F
07/16 17:28, 119F
→
07/16 17:29, , 120F
07/16 17:29, 120F
噓
07/16 17:29, , 121F
07/16 17:29, 121F
推
07/16 17:30, , 122F
07/16 17:30, 122F
推
07/16 17:33, , 123F
07/16 17:33, 123F
→
07/16 17:33, , 124F
07/16 17:33, 124F
→
07/17 10:00, , 125F
07/17 10:00, 125F
討論串 (同標題文章)