[閒聊] 玻璃保護貼為何價差這麼大?
昨天看到這篇文章
為何鋼化玻璃保護貼價差這麼大?品質內幕大解析
http://goo.gl/11hGVn
這問題我之前也疑惑很久了,為什麼一樣是玻璃保護貼
有的只要一兩百,有的卻要上千元
這篇文章提到說玻璃材質、鋼化程度、背膠、電鍍方式都有影響
所以廉價保護貼是這樣來的:
「綜合以上所說,廉價的鋼化玻璃保護貼是怎麼來的?使用便宜中國製的鈉鈣玻璃,進行不
完全的鋼化,使用劣質的背膠,簡單塗上防指紋油,做出來的玻璃保護貼同樣宣稱是9H鋼
化、可疏水疏油。消費者不明所以,被便宜的價格所吸引,結果用起來透光度較差、指紋
容易殘留也就算了,簡單一撞就缺角破裂,導致螢幕受損,反而得不償失,挑選時不可不
慎。」
我用過perskinn的保護貼,坦白說在手感上的確比我在淘寶買的好很多
只是手機沒摔過,是不是比較耐撞就不知道了
想請問有沒有懂保護貼的版友,
這篇文章說的是真的嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.254.67.229
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1442913315.A.5C8.html
推
09/22 17:16, , 1F
09/22 17:16, 1F
推
09/22 17:17, , 2F
09/22 17:17, 2F
→
09/22 17:17, , 3F
09/22 17:17, 3F
我會耶,便宜的衛生紙用起來很容易破,而且容易起毛屑
擤鼻子打噴嚏會很嚴重,所以我情願花多一點錢買好一點的
推
09/22 17:17, , 4F
09/22 17:17, 4F
※ 編輯: bluemaple2 (111.254.67.229), 09/22/2015 17:21:03
→
09/22 17:19, , 5F
09/22 17:19, 5F
噓
09/22 17:19, , 6F
09/22 17:19, 6F
推
09/22 17:19, , 7F
09/22 17:19, 7F
推
09/22 17:21, , 8F
09/22 17:21, 8F
推
09/22 17:21, , 9F
09/22 17:21, 9F
推
09/22 17:21, , 10F
09/22 17:21, 10F
→
09/22 17:21, , 11F
09/22 17:21, 11F
→
09/22 17:21, , 12F
09/22 17:21, 12F
推
09/22 17:22, , 13F
09/22 17:22, 13F
→
09/22 17:23, , 14F
09/22 17:23, 14F
→
09/22 17:24, , 15F
09/22 17:24, 15F
推
09/22 17:24, , 16F
09/22 17:24, 16F
→
09/22 17:24, , 17F
09/22 17:24, 17F
推
09/22 17:26, , 18F
09/22 17:26, 18F
→
09/22 17:27, , 19F
09/22 17:27, 19F
推
09/22 17:28, , 20F
09/22 17:28, 20F
→
09/22 17:28, , 21F
09/22 17:28, 21F
推
09/22 17:28, , 22F
09/22 17:28, 22F
→
09/22 17:31, , 23F
09/22 17:31, 23F
→
09/22 17:32, , 24F
09/22 17:32, 24F
→
09/22 17:33, , 25F
09/22 17:33, 25F
→
09/22 17:36, , 26F
09/22 17:36, 26F
坦白說,我覺得這要實際用過才知道
保護貼這種東西好壞感覺差很多
我以前也在網拍買過200元的玻璃保護貼
後來買perskinn是590,雖然比網拍貴了快4百
但是那個手感差異和透光度,就讓我願意多花這些錢來換
情願貴一點但我用得爽,也不想要便宜卻感覺卡卡的靠北
推
09/22 17:44, , 27F
09/22 17:44, 27F
推
09/22 17:45, , 28F
09/22 17:45, 28F
推
09/22 17:45, , 29F
09/22 17:45, 29F
→
09/22 17:47, , 30F
09/22 17:47, 30F
推
09/22 17:47, , 31F
09/22 17:47, 31F
→
09/22 17:47, , 32F
09/22 17:47, 32F
→
09/22 17:47, , 33F
09/22 17:47, 33F
→
09/22 17:47, , 34F
09/22 17:47, 34F
※ 編輯: bluemaple2 (111.254.67.229), 09/22/2015 17:49:54
推
09/22 17:49, , 35F
09/22 17:49, 35F
還有 39 則推文
推
09/22 19:34, , 75F
09/22 19:34, 75F
推
09/22 19:40, , 76F
09/22 19:40, 76F
推
09/22 19:43, , 77F
09/22 19:43, 77F
推
09/22 19:45, , 78F
09/22 19:45, 78F
→
09/22 19:45, , 79F
09/22 19:45, 79F
→
09/22 20:08, , 80F
09/22 20:08, 80F
推
09/22 20:11, , 81F
09/22 20:11, 81F
→
09/22 20:11, , 82F
09/22 20:11, 82F
推
09/22 20:19, , 83F
09/22 20:19, 83F
推
09/22 20:20, , 84F
09/22 20:20, 84F
→
09/22 20:20, , 85F
09/22 20:20, 85F
推
09/22 20:39, , 86F
09/22 20:39, 86F
推
09/22 20:55, , 87F
09/22 20:55, 87F
推
09/22 20:55, , 88F
09/22 20:55, 88F
→
09/22 20:55, , 89F
09/22 20:55, 89F
推
09/22 20:59, , 90F
09/22 20:59, 90F
→
09/22 21:19, , 91F
09/22 21:19, 91F
推
09/22 21:23, , 92F
09/22 21:23, 92F
→
09/22 21:23, , 93F
09/22 21:23, 93F
→
09/22 21:24, , 94F
09/22 21:24, 94F
→
09/22 21:24, , 95F
09/22 21:24, 95F
→
09/22 21:25, , 96F
09/22 21:25, 96F
推
09/22 21:55, , 97F
09/22 21:55, 97F
→
09/22 22:26, , 98F
09/22 22:26, 98F
→
09/22 22:28, , 99F
09/22 22:28, 99F
推
09/22 22:47, , 100F
09/22 22:47, 100F
推
09/22 23:07, , 101F
09/22 23:07, 101F
→
09/22 23:07, , 102F
09/22 23:07, 102F
→
09/22 23:53, , 103F
09/22 23:53, 103F
推
09/23 00:07, , 104F
09/23 00:07, 104F
推
09/23 00:41, , 105F
09/23 00:41, 105F
→
09/23 00:41, , 106F
09/23 00:41, 106F
→
09/23 00:41, , 107F
09/23 00:41, 107F
→
09/23 00:42, , 108F
09/23 00:42, 108F
→
09/23 09:49, , 109F
09/23 09:49, 109F
推
09/23 10:16, , 110F
09/23 10:16, 110F
推
09/24 01:02, , 111F
09/24 01:02, 111F
→
09/24 01:02, , 112F
09/24 01:02, 112F
→
09/24 01:02, , 113F
09/24 01:02, 113F
推
09/24 10:46, , 114F
09/24 10:46, 114F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
閒聊
50
114