Re: [閒聊] Snapdragon 810 vs 808 差距真的很大嗎
When we reviewed the HTC One M9 and and LG G4, we commended both phones for
their flawless multi-tasking.
Here, we pushed both devices a bit harder, running the games, Asphalt, Mortal
Kombat X and Modern Combat 3 simultaneously, while also having ten tabs open in the Chrome browser.
根本原文說的是開三個遊戲還有10個Chrome標籤丟背景
Neither phone took too kindly to having so much strain put on their resources, but the 810 proved itself a bit more of a willing by letting two of the three
CPU-intensive games run in the background and then be re-opened from where
you left off.
The LG G4/Snapdragon 808 would force-close two out of the three games, so
re-opening from the Recent Apps menu would result in them opening afresh.
敘述G4較積極關閉丟背景多工的遊戲
被關閉的遊戲,再喚出來就會要重新開啟
可是結論居然是
The Snapdragon 810 device was better at running apps in the background than
the Snapdragon 808. / c ANDROIDPIT
這明明是各家記憶體管理的不同,根本並非810/808造成的差異
居然就當成810/808的差異在講是有沒有搞錯?
先前#1Ls75zxU
G4還因會較Note 5保留背景被嫌優缺參半
沒想到反過來卻也一樣被嫌...
回歸810和808話題
愛比較的話就來看看
單開APP誰慢? https://youtu.be/fxQ6cBGr4BI?t=86
另外還有較舊的可看 https://youtu.be/DTVxv6vdYck
808沒多好
只是810多只看到除GPU和跑分帳面之外
表現反倒會輸808罷了
5吋上下的手機被動散熱,倒底搞不搞得定810
上次Z3+/Z4失望透頂,就等看Z5如果又是810
有無神調教來翻盤吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 133.203.126.13
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1441034138.A.BCF.html
推
08/31 23:16, , 1F
08/31 23:16, 1F
推
08/31 23:33, , 2F
08/31 23:33, 2F
推
08/31 23:37, , 3F
08/31 23:37, 3F
推
08/31 23:38, , 4F
08/31 23:38, 4F
→
08/31 23:57, , 5F
08/31 23:57, 5F
→
09/01 00:01, , 6F
09/01 00:01, 6F
推
09/01 00:13, , 7F
09/01 00:13, 7F
→
09/01 00:31, , 8F
09/01 00:31, 8F
抱歉食言 影片因測試方式不良 放沒多久就撤了
→
09/01 01:31, , 9F
09/01 01:31, 9F
→
09/01 01:33, , 10F
09/01 01:33, 10F
→
09/01 01:33, , 11F
09/01 01:33, 11F
埋怨一下TWGATE卡到得VPN繞遠路,找影片有點困難
想了想乾脆放棄比多開
一來影片測試要夠水準難找 二來變成是比誰留多和又載入一次的時間
多開多工測試本身根本偏離810/808主題
另外
我想這應該就是所言G4多工"保留"了 https://youtu.be/r4wiV5nBVqw
保留得多或少算是記憶體管理各家自己的斟酌,也脫離810/808問題
既然多工保留得多或少都會被嫌,也沒什麼能說了
況且主題也非在定論誰好誰差,只是現實就是810害慘一堆旗艦機
※ 編輯: SPDY (123.202.157.196), 09/01/2015 02:44:48
推
09/01 07:08, , 12F
09/01 07:08, 12F
→
09/01 07:08, , 13F
09/01 07:08, 13F
→
09/01 07:08, , 14F
09/01 07:08, 14F
→
09/01 07:08, , 15F
09/01 07:08, 15F
推
09/01 08:23, , 16F
09/01 08:23, 16F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):