[情報] HTC M9主鏡頭改用20MP的原因已回收
不過大家應該還記得,先前 HTC 推出 Ultrapixel 做為 M7 的主相機時,曾經力推「畫
素不等於畫質」這個論點;如今用了 2000 萬畫素的主相機,雖然感光元件較大(M8
Ultrapixel 感光元件為 1/3 吋大小),但畫素尺寸依舊較小,這樣不是打自己臉嗎?關
於這點 HTC 表示,他們還是相信畫素多寡不等於畫質好壞的論點,不過感光元件技術日
新月異,現在已經有了可以兼顧畫質與畫素的感光元件供他們使用,並且市場上還是有相
當多希望有更高畫素相機的消費者,因此他們就把同樣也受用戶好評的 Ultrapixel 相機
當作自拍相機,讓自拍的畫質更優;同時也有 2000 萬的高畫素主相機可用。
詳見:
2015 旗艦款!HTC One M9 外觀設計秘辛一次看
http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/4542/4930283/1/rv/htc-one-m9-64g-review/
---
Eprice的這篇M9報導寫的還算不錯
昨天發表會看完有點覺得不知所云、沒啥亮點
不過看了這篇秘辛介紹後,覺得M9其實也改進了不少地方,發表會怎麼不強調呢
至於主鏡頭從高感光的400萬UP換成2000萬,打不打臉不重要,市場反應決定一切
個人是滿看好的,不過這個點大概今年hTC會一直被拿來酸吧
這也讓我想到,或許Asus的PixelMaster技術會是個平衡點
相機擁有高畫素,夜拍時再為了提升進光量減少畫素
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.30.217
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1425274042.A.5C3.html
→
03/02 13:28, , 1F
03/02 13:28, 1F
推
03/02 13:28, , 2F
03/02 13:28, 2F
推
03/02 13:28, , 3F
03/02 13:28, 3F
推
03/02 13:29, , 4F
03/02 13:29, 4F
推
03/02 13:29, , 5F
03/02 13:29, 5F
推
03/02 13:29, , 6F
03/02 13:29, 6F
→
03/02 13:29, , 7F
03/02 13:29, 7F
推
03/02 13:30, , 8F
03/02 13:30, 8F
推
03/02 13:31, , 9F
03/02 13:31, 9F
推
03/02 13:33, , 10F
03/02 13:33, 10F
→
03/02 13:34, , 11F
03/02 13:34, 11F
推
03/02 13:34, , 12F
03/02 13:34, 12F
→
03/02 13:34, , 13F
03/02 13:34, 13F
→
03/02 13:35, , 14F
03/02 13:35, 14F
推
03/02 13:37, , 15F
03/02 13:37, 15F
推
03/02 13:37, , 16F
03/02 13:37, 16F
推
03/02 13:37, , 17F
03/02 13:37, 17F
推
03/02 13:37, , 18F
03/02 13:37, 18F
→
03/02 13:37, , 19F
03/02 13:37, 19F
推
03/02 13:40, , 20F
03/02 13:40, 20F
推
03/02 13:42, , 21F
03/02 13:42, 21F
推
03/02 13:42, , 22F
03/02 13:42, 22F
推
03/02 13:42, , 23F
03/02 13:42, 23F
→
03/02 13:42, , 24F
03/02 13:42, 24F
→
03/02 13:43, , 25F
03/02 13:43, 25F
推
03/02 13:45, , 26F
03/02 13:45, 26F
推
03/02 13:46, , 27F
03/02 13:46, 27F
→
03/02 13:47, , 28F
03/02 13:47, 28F
推
03/02 13:50, , 29F
03/02 13:50, 29F
→
03/02 13:51, , 30F
03/02 13:51, 30F
→
03/02 13:51, , 31F
03/02 13:51, 31F
→
03/02 13:51, , 32F
03/02 13:51, 32F
→
03/02 13:52, , 33F
03/02 13:52, 33F
推
03/02 13:52, , 34F
03/02 13:52, 34F
推
03/02 13:56, , 35F
03/02 13:56, 35F
→
03/02 13:57, , 36F
03/02 13:57, 36F
→
03/02 13:58, , 37F
03/02 13:58, 37F
推
03/02 13:58, , 38F
03/02 13:58, 38F
推
03/02 14:01, , 39F
03/02 14:01, 39F
推
03/02 14:02, , 40F
03/02 14:02, 40F
推
03/02 14:16, , 41F
03/02 14:16, 41F
推
03/02 14:36, , 42F
03/02 14:36, 42F
推
03/02 14:37, , 43F
03/02 14:37, 43F
推
03/02 15:05, , 44F
03/02 15:05, 44F
推
03/02 15:06, , 45F
03/02 15:06, 45F
→
03/02 15:06, , 46F
03/02 15:06, 46F
推
03/02 15:10, , 47F
03/02 15:10, 47F
推
03/02 15:13, , 48F
03/02 15:13, 48F
推
03/02 15:14, , 49F
03/02 15:14, 49F
推
03/02 15:15, , 50F
03/02 15:15, 50F
推
03/02 15:16, , 51F
03/02 15:16, 51F
噓
03/02 15:18, , 52F
03/02 15:18, 52F
→
03/02 15:21, , 53F
03/02 15:21, 53F
推
03/02 15:23, , 54F
03/02 15:23, 54F
→
03/02 15:30, , 55F
03/02 15:30, 55F
→
03/02 15:30, , 56F
03/02 15:30, 56F
→
03/02 15:30, , 57F
03/02 15:30, 57F
推
03/02 15:32, , 58F
03/02 15:32, 58F
推
03/02 15:37, , 59F
03/02 15:37, 59F
推
03/02 15:40, , 60F
03/02 15:40, 60F
推
03/02 15:49, , 61F
03/02 15:49, 61F
推
03/02 16:21, , 62F
03/02 16:21, 62F
推
03/02 16:45, , 63F
03/02 16:45, 63F
→
03/02 19:33, , 64F
03/02 19:33, 64F
推
03/02 20:08, , 65F
03/02 20:08, 65F
推
03/02 21:16, , 66F
03/02 21:16, 66F
→
03/02 21:17, , 67F
03/02 21:17, 67F
→
03/02 21:17, , 68F
03/02 21:17, 68F
噓
03/03 01:52, , 69F
03/03 01:52, 69F