[情報] 小米林斌回應IVE抄襲質疑:他用過小米?已回收
http://www.techweb.com.cn/wanbao/2014-10-10/2082262.shtml
蘋果總設計師艾維(Jony Ive)在名利場峰會接受采訪時,一名觀眾問他對小米和它的一
個非官方口號“中國的蘋果”有什麼看法,艾維說:“我會覺得有些刺耳,並且我不認為
這是一種奉承。當你第一次做某件事時,你並不知道你會成功,你做了七八年的努力,被
別人簡單複制,這是剽竊和懶惰,我認為這是不好的。”
然後小米林斌對艾維質疑小米抄襲的事情進行了回應,林斌說:"對小米抄襲蘋果的指控
,我就想問一句話,是不是真的用過我們的手機,我非常願意送他一隻,用過之後再發表
意見。
當被問及對蘋果產品的看法時,林斌表示:“不評價其他公司的產品”。
所以,問題來了,中國抄襲到底哪家強?
心得:
首先,小米高層的對外公關反應真的非常迅速,
看我國的食品工業高層都還像是完全不知道發生了甚麼事情XD
然後這個回話也蠻夠火藥味的,
不過不知道蘋果拆不拆其他家的手機來寫拆機報告的
如果有的話多少應該也有看過(吧?)
--
▄ █▌▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄█▄ ▄█▌▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▌▄▌█▌▌
▄▄▄▄▄▌ ▄▄▄▄▄▌▄▄▄ ▄▄
██████▄██▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄▄ ▌▄▄▄ Yuzuki
██████▄▄ ▄ ▄▄██▄▄ ▄█▄▄
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.34.146
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1412958317.A.816.html
噓
10/11 00:27, , 1F
10/11 00:27, 1F
推
10/11 00:27, , 2F
10/11 00:27, 2F
推
10/11 00:29, , 3F
10/11 00:29, 3F
推
10/11 00:31, , 4F
10/11 00:31, 4F
→
10/11 00:31, , 5F
10/11 00:31, 5F
→
10/11 00:31, , 6F
10/11 00:31, 6F
推
10/11 00:32, , 7F
10/11 00:32, 7F
→
10/11 00:32, , 8F
10/11 00:32, 8F
→
10/11 00:32, , 9F
10/11 00:32, 9F
推
10/11 00:36, , 10F
10/11 00:36, 10F
→
10/11 00:36, , 11F
10/11 00:36, 11F
推
10/11 00:37, , 12F
10/11 00:37, 12F
推
10/11 00:39, , 13F
10/11 00:39, 13F
推
10/11 00:48, , 14F
10/11 00:48, 14F
推
10/11 00:52, , 15F
10/11 00:52, 15F
推
10/11 00:55, , 16F
10/11 00:55, 16F
推
10/11 00:57, , 17F
10/11 00:57, 17F
推
10/11 00:57, , 18F
10/11 00:57, 18F
推
10/11 00:59, , 19F
10/11 00:59, 19F
推
10/11 01:00, , 20F
10/11 01:00, 20F
→
10/11 01:00, , 21F
10/11 01:00, 21F
推
10/11 01:01, , 22F
10/11 01:01, 22F
→
10/11 01:01, , 23F
10/11 01:01, 23F
→
10/11 01:02, , 24F
10/11 01:02, 24F
→
10/11 01:03, , 25F
10/11 01:03, 25F
→
10/11 01:04, , 26F
10/11 01:04, 26F
→
10/11 01:04, , 27F
10/11 01:04, 27F
噓
10/11 01:04, , 28F
10/11 01:04, 28F
→
10/11 01:05, , 29F
10/11 01:05, 29F
推
10/11 01:05, , 30F
10/11 01:05, 30F
→
10/11 01:05, , 31F
10/11 01:05, 31F
→
10/11 01:06, , 32F
10/11 01:06, 32F
→
10/11 01:07, , 33F
10/11 01:07, 33F
→
10/11 01:07, , 34F
10/11 01:07, 34F
推
10/11 01:07, , 35F
10/11 01:07, 35F
→
10/11 01:07, , 36F
10/11 01:07, 36F
→
10/11 01:08, , 37F
10/11 01:08, 37F
推
10/11 01:08, , 38F
10/11 01:08, 38F
推
10/11 01:10, , 39F
10/11 01:10, 39F
還有 34 則推文
→
10/11 08:13, , 74F
10/11 08:13, 74F
→
10/11 08:13, , 75F
10/11 08:13, 75F
→
10/11 08:15, , 76F
10/11 08:15, 76F
→
10/11 08:15, , 77F
10/11 08:15, 77F
推
10/11 08:20, , 78F
10/11 08:20, 78F
推
10/11 08:20, , 79F
10/11 08:20, 79F
→
10/11 08:20, , 80F
10/11 08:20, 80F
推
10/11 08:22, , 81F
10/11 08:22, 81F
推
10/11 09:05, , 82F
10/11 09:05, 82F
推
10/11 09:28, , 83F
10/11 09:28, 83F
→
10/11 09:28, , 84F
10/11 09:28, 84F
→
10/11 09:28, , 85F
10/11 09:28, 85F
→
10/11 09:28, , 86F
10/11 09:28, 86F
→
10/11 09:28, , 87F
10/11 09:28, 87F
→
10/11 09:28, , 88F
10/11 09:28, 88F
→
10/11 09:28, , 89F
10/11 09:28, 89F
推
10/11 09:29, , 90F
10/11 09:29, 90F
推
10/11 10:08, , 91F
10/11 10:08, 91F
推
10/11 10:39, , 92F
10/11 10:39, 92F
→
10/11 10:41, , 93F
10/11 10:41, 93F
→
10/11 10:42, , 94F
10/11 10:42, 94F
推
10/11 10:43, , 95F
10/11 10:43, 95F
推
10/11 10:51, , 96F
10/11 10:51, 96F
推
10/11 11:13, , 97F
10/11 11:13, 97F
→
10/11 11:13, , 98F
10/11 11:13, 98F
→
10/11 11:16, , 99F
10/11 11:16, 99F
→
10/11 11:17, , 100F
10/11 11:17, 100F
推
10/11 11:21, , 101F
10/11 11:21, 101F
→
10/11 11:21, , 102F
10/11 11:21, 102F
→
10/11 11:34, , 103F
10/11 11:34, 103F
推
10/11 12:41, , 104F
10/11 12:41, 104F
→
10/11 12:41, , 105F
10/11 12:41, 105F
→
10/11 12:44, , 106F
10/11 12:44, 106F
→
10/11 12:44, , 107F
10/11 12:44, 107F
→
10/11 12:51, , 108F
10/11 12:51, 108F
推
10/11 13:16, , 109F
10/11 13:16, 109F
推
10/11 13:40, , 110F
10/11 13:40, 110F
→
10/11 13:40, , 111F
10/11 13:40, 111F
→
10/11 13:41, , 112F
10/11 13:41, 112F
推
10/11 14:13, , 113F
10/11 14:13, 113F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):