Re: [討論] 為什麼今年旗艦機規格都不上不下的已回收
看板MobileComm作者Morrislakbay (莫里斯四方報)時間9年前 (2014/09/19 19:44)推噓26(29推 3噓 83→)留言115則, 21人參與討論串4/5 (看更多)
※ 引述《Morrislakbay (莫里斯四方報)》之銘言:
噓
09/19 03:15,
09/19 03:15
→
09/19 03:15,
09/19 03:15
噓
09/19 03:18,
09/19 03:18
藉此推文問個問題
現階段安卓生態圈 絕大多數的軟體功能都是由GOOGLE所提供的
較為細部的軟體則有GOOGLE PLAY這個機制 讓軟體廠可以不經過硬體廠的剝削
就直接把其產品放到上面去賣
而會把其內附軟體功能作為行銷重點者
目前可見度比較高的 是為htc的sense
之前甚至有sense就值5000塊的說法
請問 如果把sense獨立到google play出來賣的話
各位願意付多少錢購買呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.169.81.222
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1411127065.A.E96.html
推
09/19 19:48, , 1F
09/19 19:48, 1F
→
09/19 19:48, , 2F
09/19 19:48, 2F
推
09/19 19:49, , 3F
09/19 19:49, 3F
→
09/19 19:50, , 4F
09/19 19:50, 4F
→
09/19 19:50, , 5F
09/19 19:50, 5F
推
09/19 19:52, , 6F
09/19 19:52, 6F
推
09/19 19:55, , 7F
09/19 19:55, 7F
→
09/19 19:55, , 8F
09/19 19:55, 8F
→
09/19 19:55, , 9F
09/19 19:55, 9F
還可以在加舉幾個例子
像是SONY 三星 HTC等走高價路線的廠商
和小米 華為 等 走低價路線的廠商 出現韌體問題的機率 與解決的速度 根本差不了多少
特別是sony 那售價對上他的系統出問題的機率....
至於白牌機的問題 我已在原文中解釋過了
推
09/19 19:58, , 10F
09/19 19:58, 10F
→
09/19 19:58, , 11F
09/19 19:58, 11F
推
09/19 20:00, , 12F
09/19 20:00, 12F
推
09/19 20:00, , 13F
09/19 20:00, 13F
推
09/19 20:06, , 14F
09/19 20:06, 14F
推
09/19 20:07, , 15F
09/19 20:07, 15F
推
09/19 20:12, , 16F
09/19 20:12, 16F
→
09/19 20:12, , 17F
09/19 20:12, 17F
噓
09/19 20:13, , 18F
09/19 20:13, 18F
→
09/19 20:13, , 19F
09/19 20:13, 19F
→
09/19 20:14, , 20F
09/19 20:14, 20F
我之前聽到的是值6000的說XDDD 已修正
噓
09/19 20:14, , 21F
09/19 20:14, 21F
→
09/19 20:14, , 22F
09/19 20:14, 22F
→
09/19 20:17, , 23F
09/19 20:17, 23F
→
09/19 20:17, , 24F
09/19 20:17, 24F
推
09/19 20:19, , 25F
09/19 20:19, 25F
※ 編輯: Morrislakbay (1.169.81.222), 09/19/2014 20:20:55
推
09/19 20:21, , 26F
09/19 20:21, 26F
推
09/19 20:39, , 27F
09/19 20:39, 27F
→
09/19 20:39, , 28F
09/19 20:39, 28F
→
09/19 20:39, , 29F
09/19 20:39, 29F
→
09/19 20:40, , 30F
09/19 20:40, 30F
→
09/19 20:40, , 31F
09/19 20:40, 31F
→
09/19 20:40, , 32F
09/19 20:40, 32F
還有 43 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
09/19 22:33, , 76F
09/19 22:33, 76F
→
09/19 22:33, , 77F
09/19 22:33, 77F
→
09/19 22:34, , 78F
09/19 22:34, 78F
推
09/19 22:35, , 79F
09/19 22:35, 79F
→
09/19 22:35, , 80F
09/19 22:35, 80F
→
09/19 22:35, , 81F
09/19 22:35, 81F
→
09/19 22:35, , 82F
09/19 22:35, 82F
→
09/19 22:35, , 83F
09/19 22:35, 83F
→
09/19 22:36, , 84F
09/19 22:36, 84F
→
09/19 22:36, , 85F
09/19 22:36, 85F
→
09/19 22:37, , 86F
09/19 22:37, 86F
→
09/19 22:37, , 87F
09/19 22:37, 87F
→
09/19 22:37, , 88F
09/19 22:37, 88F
推
09/19 22:38, , 89F
09/19 22:38, 89F
→
09/19 22:38, , 90F
09/19 22:38, 90F
→
09/19 22:38, , 91F
09/19 22:38, 91F
→
09/19 22:39, , 92F
09/19 22:39, 92F
→
09/19 22:39, , 93F
09/19 22:39, 93F
→
09/19 22:41, , 94F
09/19 22:41, 94F
→
09/19 22:41, , 95F
09/19 22:41, 95F
→
09/19 22:43, , 96F
09/19 22:43, 96F
→
09/19 22:44, , 97F
09/19 22:44, 97F
推
09/19 22:45, , 98F
09/19 22:45, 98F
→
09/19 22:46, , 99F
09/19 22:46, 99F
→
09/19 22:46, , 100F
09/19 22:46, 100F
推
09/19 22:49, , 101F
09/19 22:49, 101F
→
09/19 22:49, , 102F
09/19 22:49, 102F
→
09/19 22:49, , 103F
09/19 22:49, 103F
→
09/19 22:49, , 104F
09/19 22:49, 104F
推
09/19 22:51, , 105F
09/19 22:51, 105F
→
09/19 22:51, , 106F
09/19 22:51, 106F
→
09/19 22:51, , 107F
09/19 22:51, 107F
推
09/19 22:56, , 108F
09/19 22:56, 108F
→
09/19 22:56, , 109F
09/19 22:56, 109F
→
09/19 22:56, , 110F
09/19 22:56, 110F
→
09/19 22:56, , 111F
09/19 22:56, 111F
推
09/19 23:40, , 112F
09/19 23:40, 112F
推
09/20 06:03, , 113F
09/20 06:03, 113F
→
09/20 06:03, , 114F
09/20 06:03, 114F
推
09/20 07:30, , 115F
09/20 07:30, 115F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):