[問題] S5跟Galaxy J的比較?已回收
看板MobileComm作者TheoEpstein (Boston Red Sox)時間11年前 (2014/07/13 17:25)推噓64(64推 0噓 178→)留言242則, 38人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
有稍微爬一下文,但主客觀條件已經跟過去不一樣了....
首先,這兩支手機的跳水都非常誇張,不下索尼。
S5:16800 (跟NOTE3 LTE版同價)
GJ:11500 (這跳水超猛)
尤其是六月底要辦大省時,最後放棄Galaxy J是因為價格:大省價10990。
幾乎跟空機同價了,就辦了G PRO2(雖然也在短時間脫手,而且是大省價賣出...)。
但是當時忘了,Galaxy J買跳水價空機還有一個問題:保固
三星原廠維修站是看出廠日保固的,Galaxy J怕買到半年以上存貨。
這點S5就比較好,至少沒有2013年出廠的S5。
其實我對Galaxy J還蠻滿意的,但手上這支要給老媽換掉XPERIA T....
變成我得再去找個手機來補這個洞,而原本計劃中的G PRO2因為太大而放棄。
(G3則是2K解析度讓我對它有疑慮,放棄之)
S5我對它最大的不安感是...它是S系列,去年S4讓我非常失望,S3用過也不喜歡。
所以想請教一下板友,Galaxy J跟S5,
在操作、功能、拍照上,差異會很明顯嗎?
目前是傾向S5,但如果表現反而退步的話就祇好放棄了。
PS.
當然真的沒辦法,就是再去買一支Galaxy J,一支我用,一支給我媽用....
[補充]
久違的甘特圖更新:
http://i.imgur.com/0k0SaWJ.png

光看壹號機是這樣:
http://i.imgur.com/Di4YaMB.png

那些很短的壹號機都是一拿來當壹號機用就大囧,然後馬上換掉。
S4差點害我下不了高鐵,絕對是印象最深刻的一支...(抖抖抖)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.167.241
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1405243548.A.37E.html
→
07/13 17:26, , 1F
07/13 17:26, 1F
推
07/13 17:29, , 2F
07/13 17:29, 2F
推
07/13 17:29, , 3F
07/13 17:29, 3F
→
07/13 17:29, , 4F
07/13 17:29, 4F
→
07/13 17:30, , 5F
07/13 17:30, 5F
推
07/13 17:30, , 6F
07/13 17:30, 6F
對保固沒信心......
推
07/13 17:33, , 7F
07/13 17:33, 7F
→
07/13 17:34, , 8F
07/13 17:34, 8F
推
07/13 17:36, , 9F
07/13 17:36, 9F
→
07/13 17:38, , 10F
07/13 17:38, 10F
→
07/13 17:40, , 11F
07/13 17:40, 11F
→
07/13 17:41, , 12F
07/13 17:41, 12F
→
07/13 17:42, , 13F
07/13 17:42, 13F
→
07/13 17:44, , 14F
07/13 17:44, 14F
→
07/13 17:44, , 15F
07/13 17:44, 15F
→
07/13 17:44, , 16F
07/13 17:44, 16F
→
07/13 17:45, , 17F
07/13 17:45, 17F
....我可以稱呼你一句華生嗎?這突破盲點了啊啊啊,大感謝。
→
07/13 17:45, , 18F
07/13 17:45, 18F
→
07/13 17:45, , 19F
07/13 17:45, 19F
沒試過這種轉送,而且代理商怕是聯強或震旦或全虹....(跳水價空機很多這幾家的)
→
07/13 17:46, , 20F
07/13 17:46, 20F
推
07/13 17:48, , 21F
07/13 17:48, 21F
→
07/13 17:48, , 22F
07/13 17:48, 22F
→
07/13 17:48, , 23F
07/13 17:48, 23F
→
07/13 17:48, , 24F
07/13 17:48, 24F
推
07/13 17:48, , 25F
07/13 17:48, 25F
→
07/13 17:48, , 26F
07/13 17:48, 26F
→
07/13 17:49, , 27F
07/13 17:49, 27F
→
07/13 17:49, , 28F
07/13 17:49, 28F
推
07/13 17:52, , 29F
07/13 17:52, 29F
→
07/13 17:52, , 30F
07/13 17:52, 30F
→
07/13 17:52, , 31F
07/13 17:52, 31F
MOMO有點貴...12800...>_<
→
07/13 17:53, , 32F
07/13 17:53, 32F
如果講個最白話最客觀的原因,叫做「收訊」,wifi與3G/4G。
但真正的原因是主觀的:拿了9個月,膩了也快過保了,脫手吧。
→
07/13 17:55, , 33F
07/13 17:55, 33F
→
07/13 17:56, , 34F
07/13 17:56, 34F
還有 168 則推文
還有 9 段內文
推
07/13 22:37, , 203F
07/13 22:37, 203F
→
07/13 22:37, , 204F
07/13 22:37, 204F
→
07/13 22:37, , 205F
07/13 22:37, 205F
→
07/13 22:37, , 206F
07/13 22:37, 206F
→
07/13 22:41, , 207F
07/13 22:41, 207F
推
07/13 22:44, , 208F
07/13 22:44, 208F
→
07/13 23:08, , 209F
07/13 23:08, 209F
→
07/13 23:09, , 210F
07/13 23:09, 210F
推
07/13 23:44, , 211F
07/13 23:44, 211F
推
07/13 23:53, , 212F
07/13 23:53, 212F
→
07/13 23:56, , 213F
07/13 23:56, 213F
推
07/14 00:01, , 214F
07/14 00:01, 214F
→
07/14 00:03, , 215F
07/14 00:03, 215F
推
07/14 00:04, , 216F
07/14 00:04, 216F
→
07/14 00:04, , 217F
07/14 00:04, 217F
推
07/14 00:14, , 218F
07/14 00:14, 218F
推
07/14 00:27, , 219F
07/14 00:27, 219F
→
07/14 00:28, , 220F
07/14 00:28, 220F
→
07/14 00:46, , 221F
07/14 00:46, 221F
→
07/14 00:47, , 222F
07/14 00:47, 222F
→
07/14 00:48, , 223F
07/14 00:48, 223F
推
07/14 00:53, , 224F
07/14 00:53, 224F
推
07/14 00:56, , 225F
07/14 00:56, 225F
推
07/14 00:57, , 226F
07/14 00:57, 226F
→
07/14 00:58, , 227F
07/14 00:58, 227F
推
07/14 00:58, , 228F
07/14 00:58, 228F
→
07/14 00:59, , 229F
07/14 00:59, 229F
→
07/14 01:04, , 230F
07/14 01:04, 230F
→
07/14 01:04, , 231F
07/14 01:04, 231F
→
07/14 01:12, , 232F
07/14 01:12, 232F
→
07/14 01:20, , 233F
07/14 01:20, 233F
推
07/14 01:33, , 234F
07/14 01:33, 234F
→
07/14 01:46, , 235F
07/14 01:46, 235F
推
07/15 01:48, , 236F
07/15 01:48, 236F
推
07/15 22:46, , 237F
07/15 22:46, 237F
推
07/18 17:56, , 238F
07/18 17:56, 238F
推
07/19 11:07, , 239F
07/19 11:07, 239F
→
07/19 11:08, , 240F
07/19 11:08, 240F
→
08/18 08:46, , 241F
08/18 08:46, 241F
→
10/05 08:03, , 242F
10/05 08:03, 242F
討論串 (同標題文章)