[新聞]宏碁Liquid S2讚,德國雜誌評價近滿分消失
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140211002735-260410
《電腦設備》宏碁Liquid S2讚,德國雜誌評價近滿分
德國發行量最大的IT類雜誌Computer Bild,在近期一篇指標性報導中,針對平板手機(
Phablet)類產品,給予宏碁(2353)智慧型手機Liquid S2高度肯定以及近滿分的好評。
Computer Bild雜誌的專題報導中,Acer Liquid S2在平板手機類1~6分評選範圍中,得到
1.88近滿分的成績,優於其他品牌如Asus、SONY及Nokia的同類型產品。
Computer Bild雜誌表示,Acer Liquid S2的高畫質4K錄影及高解析相片品質、高速處理
器及高速連結WiFi與LTE的能力,是在此評選中獲得評審青睞的主要原因,評審也認為宏
碁已將智慧型手機發展到更高端的領域。
宏碁Liquid S2智慧型手機,具有紅黑雙色外型靚艷時尚,螢幕超大且操控便利,支援4G
行動通訊、可錄製解析度達4K的超高畫質影片、或拍攝27MP的全景照片的智慧型手機,帶
給使用者極致的行動影音生活。
宏碁表示,自從2012年推出S500智慧型手機,開始研發高端機種以來,歷經Liquid S1與
Liquid S2,宏碁在高端智慧型手機的設計,已經更加成熟,同時也能切實掌握消費者的
需求。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
這支在台上市不曉得滿三個月沒有?蠻意外的是買的人少,討論的人更少。
比規格,看起來好像HTC One Max,Samsung Note III都不輸,雖然有人說售
價沒有LG G2優,但我覺得5.2吋跟6吋不應該被放在一個籃子裡比才對,對手
機還是該設在One Max,Note或Sony Z Ultra這些Phablet機型才對?
不曉得為啥這支熱度這麼低?純粹是因為Acer這個品牌的關係嗎?我個人是
覺得Acer手機正面設計沒有HTC或Samsung跟Sony來得好看啦....但外觀應該
很見人見志才是....有沒有板友有啥高見?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
推
02/11 21:01, , 1F
02/11 21:01, 1F
→
02/11 21:01, , 2F
02/11 21:01, 2F
推
02/11 21:02, , 3F
02/11 21:02, 3F
進大省當然是很吸引人,不過觀察身邊朋友或網路上,One Max或NoteIII這些
主流手機好像也很多人在詢問空機啊?好像跟有沒有搭方案沒啥關係?
※ 編輯: tanjita321 來自: 114.43.241.241 (02/11 21:04)
→
02/11 21:03, , 4F
02/11 21:03, 4F
→
02/11 21:05, , 5F
02/11 21:05, 5F
→
02/11 21:05, , 6F
02/11 21:05, 6F
→
02/11 21:06, , 7F
02/11 21:06, 7F
→
02/11 21:06, , 8F
02/11 21:06, 8F
→
02/11 21:06, , 9F
02/11 21:06, 9F
→
02/11 21:07, , 10F
02/11 21:07, 10F
→
02/11 21:09, , 11F
02/11 21:09, 11F
→
02/11 21:10, , 12F
02/11 21:10, 12F
推
02/11 21:20, , 13F
02/11 21:20, 13F
→
02/11 21:20, , 14F
02/11 21:20, 14F
推
02/11 21:23, , 15F
02/11 21:23, 15F
→
02/11 21:26, , 16F
02/11 21:26, 16F
→
02/11 21:26, , 17F
02/11 21:26, 17F
推
02/11 21:30, , 18F
02/11 21:30, 18F
→
02/11 21:33, , 19F
02/11 21:33, 19F
→
02/11 21:33, , 20F
02/11 21:33, 20F
→
02/11 21:36, , 21F
02/11 21:36, 21F
→
02/11 21:37, , 22F
02/11 21:37, 22F
→
02/11 21:37, , 23F
02/11 21:37, 23F
推
02/11 22:13, , 24F
02/11 22:13, 24F
推
02/11 22:13, , 25F
02/11 22:13, 25F
推
02/11 22:22, , 26F
02/11 22:22, 26F
→
02/11 22:22, , 27F
02/11 22:22, 27F
→
02/11 22:25, , 28F
02/11 22:25, 28F
→
02/11 22:38, , 29F
02/11 22:38, 29F
推
02/11 22:40, , 30F
02/11 22:40, 30F
推
02/11 22:45, , 31F
02/11 22:45, 31F
推
02/11 22:47, , 32F
02/11 22:47, 32F
→
02/11 22:55, , 33F
02/11 22:55, 33F
→
02/11 22:55, , 34F
02/11 22:55, 34F
推
02/11 22:58, , 35F
02/11 22:58, 35F
→
02/11 23:07, , 36F
02/11 23:07, 36F
→
02/11 23:37, , 37F
02/11 23:37, 37F
→
02/11 23:37, , 38F
02/11 23:37, 38F
→
02/11 23:38, , 39F
02/11 23:38, 39F
推
02/11 23:41, , 40F
02/11 23:41, 40F
推
02/11 23:51, , 41F
02/11 23:51, 41F
→
02/11 23:52, , 42F
02/11 23:52, 42F
推
02/11 23:58, , 43F
02/11 23:58, 43F
推
02/12 00:10, , 44F
02/12 00:10, 44F
推
02/12 00:19, , 45F
02/12 00:19, 45F
→
02/12 00:20, , 46F
02/12 00:20, 46F
推
02/12 01:05, , 47F
02/12 01:05, 47F
推
02/12 01:19, , 48F
02/12 01:19, 48F
推
02/12 01:20, , 49F
02/12 01:20, 49F
→
02/12 01:20, , 50F
02/12 01:20, 50F
推
02/12 01:31, , 51F
02/12 01:31, 51F
推
02/12 01:39, , 52F
02/12 01:39, 52F
推
02/12 01:42, , 53F
02/12 01:42, 53F
→
02/12 01:48, , 54F
02/12 01:48, 54F
→
02/12 01:49, , 55F
02/12 01:49, 55F
→
02/12 02:08, , 56F
02/12 02:08, 56F
推
02/12 02:11, , 57F
02/12 02:11, 57F
→
02/12 02:11, , 58F
02/12 02:11, 58F
→
02/12 02:47, , 59F
02/12 02:47, 59F
推
02/12 19:41, , 60F
02/12 19:41, 60F
推
02/13 01:46, , 61F
02/13 01:46, 61F