[閒聊] HTC好像沒大家說的這麼爛,是錯覺嗎?消失
在下窮酸小弟只用過2隻二手智慧手機,LG GT540與Defy,
一直都被機器的反應遲鈍所困惑,都刷了CM7~CM10還是不夠好
最近2次的紅米機又都沒搶到(不想用遠傳客製機)
剛好有親友給我一支HTC Desire C,想說先湊合著用比w610i好
(SE W610i雖然是智障手機,但是用了6年也開始不穩定)
結果發現 HTC Desire C 的 RAM 與 CPU 雖然都比不過我用過的那2隻,
也沒刷機,但是操作流暢度卻意外地好,螢幕畫質也好得多,
內建UI和App也都相當順手貼心,手寫辨識率也比我用過的(國筆app)都好
而且還是半金屬機殼,HTC 並沒有我想像中的爛,
可惜這支沒有自動對焦 & 電話錄音要原廠解鎖,所以我還是想買紅米機,
這2點真得可惜,不然這隻 Desire C 我還想再戰幾年
那為什麼PTT上都說HTC爛呢?
1. 因為software的提升,讓同硬體規格比別牌貴?
2. 內建92?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
推
12/18 08:00, , 1F
12/18 08:00, 1F
→
12/18 08:01, , 2F
12/18 08:01, 2F
→
12/18 08:01, , 3F
12/18 08:01, 3F
推
12/18 08:01, , 4F
12/18 08:01, 4F
推
12/18 08:01, , 5F
12/18 08:01, 5F
→
12/18 08:04, , 6F
12/18 08:04, 6F
→
12/18 08:05, , 7F
12/18 08:05, 7F
※ 編輯: deo2000 來自: 140.122.165.185 (12/18 08:10)
推
12/18 08:09, , 8F
12/18 08:09, 8F
→
12/18 08:11, , 9F
12/18 08:11, 9F
如果同價位有同樣的流暢度,我是不會去在意核心硬體(CPU&RAM)的規格,
不知道紅米機的software能不能提供同樣的好體驗?
※ 編輯: deo2000 來自: 140.122.165.185 (12/18 08:13)
推
12/18 08:12, , 10F
12/18 08:12, 10F
推
12/18 08:12, , 11F
12/18 08:12, 11F
推
12/18 08:13, , 12F
12/18 08:13, 12F
推
12/18 08:14, , 13F
12/18 08:14, 13F
→
12/18 08:15, , 14F
12/18 08:15, 14F
推
12/18 08:15, , 15F
12/18 08:15, 15F
→
12/18 08:15, , 16F
12/18 08:15, 16F
→
12/18 08:15, , 17F
12/18 08:15, 17F
→
12/18 08:16, , 18F
12/18 08:16, 18F
推
12/18 08:18, , 19F
12/18 08:18, 19F
→
12/18 08:19, , 20F
12/18 08:19, 20F
→
12/18 08:19, , 21F
12/18 08:19, 21F
→
12/18 08:19, , 22F
12/18 08:19, 22F
→
12/18 08:26, , 23F
12/18 08:26, 23F
推
12/18 08:26, , 24F
12/18 08:26, 24F
→
12/18 08:26, , 25F
12/18 08:26, 25F
→
12/18 08:27, , 26F
12/18 08:27, 26F
→
12/18 08:27, , 27F
12/18 08:27, 27F
推
12/18 08:31, , 28F
12/18 08:31, 28F
→
12/18 08:31, , 29F
12/18 08:31, 29F
→
12/18 08:32, , 30F
12/18 08:32, 30F
→
12/18 08:38, , 31F
12/18 08:38, 31F
推
12/18 08:47, , 32F
12/18 08:47, 32F
→
12/18 08:47, , 33F
12/18 08:47, 33F
推
12/18 08:55, , 34F
12/18 08:55, 34F
→
12/18 08:56, , 35F
12/18 08:56, 35F
推
12/18 09:10, , 36F
12/18 09:10, 36F
→
12/18 09:34, , 37F
12/18 09:34, 37F
→
12/18 09:35, , 38F
12/18 09:35, 38F
→
12/18 09:36, , 39F
12/18 09:36, 39F
推
12/18 09:38, , 40F
12/18 09:38, 40F
→
12/18 09:40, , 41F
12/18 09:40, 41F
推
12/18 09:41, , 42F
12/18 09:41, 42F
→
12/18 09:41, , 43F
12/18 09:41, 43F
推
12/18 09:42, , 44F
12/18 09:42, 44F
推
12/18 09:43, , 45F
12/18 09:43, 45F
推
12/18 09:45, , 46F
12/18 09:45, 46F
→
12/18 09:45, , 47F
12/18 09:45, 47F
推
12/18 09:47, , 48F
12/18 09:47, 48F
→
12/18 10:05, , 49F
12/18 10:05, 49F
→
12/18 10:07, , 50F
12/18 10:07, 50F
→
12/18 10:12, , 51F
12/18 10:12, 51F
→
12/18 10:12, , 52F
12/18 10:12, 52F
推
12/18 10:18, , 53F
12/18 10:18, 53F
推
12/18 10:19, , 54F
12/18 10:19, 54F
→
12/18 10:19, , 55F
12/18 10:19, 55F
→
12/18 10:19, , 56F
12/18 10:19, 56F
→
12/18 10:22, , 57F
12/18 10:22, 57F
推
12/18 10:26, , 58F
12/18 10:26, 58F
推
12/18 10:27, , 59F
12/18 10:27, 59F
推
12/18 10:49, , 60F
12/18 10:49, 60F
推
12/18 11:19, , 61F
12/18 11:19, 61F
推
12/18 11:49, , 62F
12/18 11:49, 62F
推
12/18 11:55, , 63F
12/18 11:55, 63F
推
12/18 11:59, , 64F
12/18 11:59, 64F
推
12/18 12:23, , 65F
12/18 12:23, 65F
推
12/18 12:43, , 66F
12/18 12:43, 66F
→
12/18 12:59, , 67F
12/18 12:59, 67F
推
12/18 13:17, , 68F
12/18 13:17, 68F
推
12/18 13:23, , 69F
12/18 13:23, 69F
推
12/18 13:53, , 70F
12/18 13:53, 70F
推
12/18 13:54, , 71F
12/18 13:54, 71F
推
12/18 15:08, , 72F
12/18 15:08, 72F
→
12/18 15:08, , 73F
12/18 15:08, 73F
→
12/18 15:09, , 74F
12/18 15:09, 74F
→
12/18 15:09, , 75F
12/18 15:09, 75F
→
12/18 15:11, , 76F
12/18 15:11, 76F
推
12/18 16:33, , 77F
12/18 16:33, 77F
推
12/18 17:48, , 78F
12/18 17:48, 78F
→
12/18 21:23, , 79F
12/18 21:23, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):