Re: [分享] 國軍頭盔實測,直接對比各國頭盔
上網查了一下,可以看到
Garand Thumb的這部影片,測試美軍下一代IHPS的效果
可以看到與舊的ECH頭盔相比,9mm彈藥其實已經在IHPS上造成肉眼可見的型變
比ECH還高
(根據這篇新聞,IHPS是PE材質,舊的ECH是凱夫勒
https://reurl.cc/XG6Ee3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwDoWSkiGZ4
可是後續Garand Thumb有繼續用其他口徑武器以及增加測試距離來複測
可以發現到PE的另一個優點出現,因為ECH比較硬,所以超出防禦能力的
測試會直接貫穿,而PE材料有一定機率靠型變攔下破片
這跟新聞裡敘述的一樣,IHPS更多靠型變來發散力量,所以高型變應該是PE材質的
正常現象,但PE材質也有一定優勢
不應該說PE就絕對比凱夫勒差?
原頻道FB上好像有提到這次測試另一頂PE頭盔好像買到仿品所以後續排除在測試外
所以這次沒有看到其他PE頭盔測試
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.97.189 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Military/M.1713194388.A.13C.html
推
04/16 01:16,
2周前
, 1F
04/16 01:16, 1F
→
04/16 01:16,
2周前
, 2F
04/16 01:16, 2F
→
04/16 01:16,
2周前
, 3F
04/16 01:16, 3F
→
04/16 01:17,
2周前
, 4F
04/16 01:17, 4F
→
04/16 01:17,
2周前
, 5F
04/16 01:17, 5F
推
04/16 01:46,
2周前
, 6F
04/16 01:46, 6F
→
04/16 01:46,
2周前
, 7F
04/16 01:46, 7F
→
04/16 01:46,
2周前
, 8F
04/16 01:46, 8F
推
04/16 05:25,
2周前
, 9F
04/16 05:25, 9F
→
04/16 06:49,
2周前
, 10F
04/16 06:49, 10F
→
04/16 06:51,
2周前
, 11F
04/16 06:51, 11F
→
04/16 06:51,
2周前
, 12F
04/16 06:51, 12F
→
04/16 06:51,
2周前
, 13F
04/16 06:51, 13F
→
04/16 06:52,
2周前
, 14F
04/16 06:52, 14F
→
04/16 06:53,
2周前
, 15F
04/16 06:53, 15F
推
04/16 06:53,
2周前
, 16F
04/16 06:53, 16F
→
04/16 06:53,
2周前
, 17F
04/16 06:53, 17F
推
04/16 06:54,
2周前
, 18F
04/16 06:54, 18F
→
04/16 06:54,
2周前
, 19F
04/16 06:54, 19F
→
04/16 06:59,
2周前
, 20F
04/16 06:59, 20F
→
04/16 07:04,
2周前
, 21F
04/16 07:04, 21F
→
04/16 07:04,
2周前
, 22F
04/16 07:04, 22F
→
04/16 07:04,
2周前
, 23F
04/16 07:04, 23F
推
04/16 09:49,
2周前
, 24F
04/16 09:49, 24F
→
04/16 09:49,
2周前
, 25F
04/16 09:49, 25F
→
04/16 09:50,
2周前
, 26F
04/16 09:50, 26F
→
04/16 09:50,
2周前
, 27F
04/16 09:50, 27F
→
04/16 09:52,
2周前
, 28F
04/16 09:52, 28F
→
04/16 09:52,
2周前
, 29F
04/16 09:52, 29F
→
04/16 09:52,
2周前
, 30F
04/16 09:52, 30F
→
04/16 10:21,
2周前
, 31F
04/16 10:21, 31F
推
04/16 10:51,
2周前
, 32F
04/16 10:51, 32F
推
04/16 11:35,
2周前
, 33F
04/16 11:35, 33F
→
04/16 11:35,
2周前
, 34F
04/16 11:35, 34F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):
分享
112
392