Re: [分享] F-35 五代機的聽證會
眾議院五代機聽證會與 F-35 有關的證詞第二彈
via Flak大聊軍事粉絲專頁
https://www.facebook.com/military.flak/posts/596220857233319
♦ 在海陸自己的演習,20架紅軍對抗4架F-35B+4架四代機,我(Davis 海陸中將)只能
說紅軍死得很慘。而更重要的是,F-35B其中一名飛行員還是官校剛畢業的菜鳥,但打得
像下部隊3-4年的老鳥(有AI,無懦夫)
♦ 空軍13架F-35A參加紅旗:
♠ 排定226次任務執行207次,19次放棄任務都是因為天候,不曾是維護問題
♠ 擊落145架敵機,損失7架,但都不是因為被鎖定,而是被肉眼看到,纏鬥中被擊落(
John Boyd表示欣慰)
♠ 紅軍不只有戰機,還有完整的防空系統與電戰能力。傳統四代機必須協調大量的兵力
才能進行攻擊,而F-35則可以直接在這個環境中作戰。F-35A模擬投下51枚炸彈,摧毀49
個防空目標。
♦ 在海陸的訓練演習中,F-35B曾創下24:0的戰績。在同樣的戰機+防空威脅下,四代機
損失一半還沒有擊中任一個地面目標
♦ 傳統的四代機像是美式足球隊,每個球員有自己的任務與位置,掩護其中幾名得分;
但五代機則像是足球(soccer)隊,每個人都是殺手,每個人都有機會得分,甚至還可增
強其他傳統隊友的戰力
♦ 在F-35B的NIFC-CA試射中,標六攔截的目標是300哩外(480km以上,比S400還S400)
心得:
多了海陸自己的演習有關F-35B的部分,叫F-35的沒一個是肉腳(F-35C:那我呢)
先前對演習強度有所質疑的第五點完全釋疑了,紅軍有完整防空系統與電戰,另外搭
配彭派的新聞可補充2個未被摧毀的防空目標是因為武器本身所致,不是F-35A的火控
系統的關係。
--
推
02/24 02:45, , 1F
02/24 02:45, 1F
推
02/24 02:51, , 2F
02/24 02:51, 2F
推
02/24 02:56, , 3F
02/24 02:56, 3F
→
02/24 02:56, , 4F
02/24 02:56, 4F
推
02/24 02:59, , 5F
02/24 02:59, 5F
推
02/24 03:07, , 6F
02/24 03:07, 6F
推
02/24 07:34, , 7F
02/24 07:34, 7F
→
02/24 07:34, , 8F
02/24 07:34, 8F
推
02/24 08:30, , 9F
02/24 08:30, 9F
→
02/24 08:33, , 10F
02/24 08:33, 10F
推
02/24 08:35, , 11F
02/24 08:35, 11F
→
02/24 08:36, , 12F
02/24 08:36, 12F
推
02/24 08:41, , 13F
02/24 08:41, 13F
→
02/24 08:42, , 14F
02/24 08:42, 14F
→
02/24 08:49, , 15F
02/24 08:49, 15F
→
02/24 08:49, , 16F
02/24 08:49, 16F
→
02/24 08:49, , 17F
02/24 08:49, 17F
→
02/24 08:49, , 18F
02/24 08:49, 18F
→
02/24 08:49, , 19F
02/24 08:49, 19F
→
02/24 08:54, , 20F
02/24 08:54, 20F
→
02/24 08:54, , 21F
02/24 08:54, 21F
→
02/24 08:55, , 22F
02/24 08:55, 22F
→
02/24 08:56, , 23F
02/24 08:56, 23F
→
02/24 08:59, , 24F
02/24 08:59, 24F
推
02/24 09:08, , 25F
02/24 09:08, 25F
→
02/24 09:12, , 26F
02/24 09:12, 26F
→
02/24 09:12, , 27F
02/24 09:12, 27F
→
02/24 09:13, , 28F
02/24 09:13, 28F
→
02/24 09:14, , 29F
02/24 09:14, 29F
→
02/24 09:18, , 30F
02/24 09:18, 30F
→
02/24 09:20, , 31F
02/24 09:20, 31F
→
02/24 09:20, , 32F
02/24 09:20, 32F
→
02/24 09:20, , 33F
02/24 09:20, 33F
→
02/24 09:21, , 34F
02/24 09:21, 34F
→
02/24 09:22, , 35F
02/24 09:22, 35F
→
02/24 09:23, , 36F
02/24 09:23, 36F
→
02/24 09:24, , 37F
02/24 09:24, 37F
→
02/24 09:27, , 38F
02/24 09:27, 38F
→
02/24 09:30, , 39F
02/24 09:30, 39F
→
02/24 09:30, , 40F
02/24 09:30, 40F
推
02/24 09:31, , 41F
02/24 09:31, 41F
→
02/24 09:32, , 42F
02/24 09:32, 42F
推
02/24 09:37, , 43F
02/24 09:37, 43F
推
02/24 09:48, , 44F
02/24 09:48, 44F
推
02/24 10:01, , 45F
02/24 10:01, 45F
→
02/24 10:01, , 46F
02/24 10:01, 46F
→
02/24 10:01, , 47F
02/24 10:01, 47F
→
02/24 10:01, , 48F
02/24 10:01, 48F
→
02/24 10:09, , 49F
02/24 10:09, 49F
→
02/24 10:09, , 50F
02/24 10:09, 50F
→
02/24 10:10, , 51F
02/24 10:10, 51F
→
02/24 10:11, , 52F
02/24 10:11, 52F
→
02/24 10:12, , 53F
02/24 10:12, 53F
推
02/24 10:32, , 54F
02/24 10:32, 54F
→
02/24 10:33, , 55F
02/24 10:33, 55F
推
02/24 10:35, , 56F
02/24 10:35, 56F
推
02/24 10:50, , 57F
02/24 10:50, 57F
推
02/24 11:22, , 58F
02/24 11:22, 58F
→
02/24 11:22, , 59F
02/24 11:22, 59F
推
02/24 11:27, , 60F
02/24 11:27, 60F
→
02/24 11:27, , 61F
02/24 11:27, 61F
→
02/24 11:27, , 62F
02/24 11:27, 62F
推
02/24 11:32, , 63F
02/24 11:32, 63F
推
02/24 11:34, , 64F
02/24 11:34, 64F
→
02/24 11:35, , 65F
02/24 11:35, 65F
→
02/24 11:35, , 66F
02/24 11:35, 66F
→
02/24 11:41, , 67F
02/24 11:41, 67F
推
02/24 13:25, , 68F
02/24 13:25, 68F
推
02/24 13:32, , 69F
02/24 13:32, 69F
推
02/24 13:37, , 70F
02/24 13:37, 70F
→
02/24 13:37, , 71F
02/24 13:37, 71F
→
02/24 13:37, , 72F
02/24 13:37, 72F
→
02/24 13:40, , 73F
02/24 13:40, 73F
→
02/24 15:10, , 74F
02/24 15:10, 74F
→
02/24 15:11, , 75F
02/24 15:11, 75F
→
02/24 15:11, , 76F
02/24 15:11, 76F
→
02/24 15:14, , 77F
02/24 15:14, 77F
→
02/24 15:36, , 78F
02/24 15:36, 78F
推
02/24 16:09, , 79F
02/24 16:09, 79F
→
02/24 16:10, , 80F
02/24 16:10, 80F
推
02/25 06:59, , 81F
02/25 06:59, 81F
※ 編輯: evansliu (103.37.95.100), 11/30/2017 02:14:01
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
分享
20
66