Re: [機統] mode of lognormal distribution

看板Math作者 (澄響幸輝絕品泉水)時間12年前 (2011/09/03 11:11), 編輯推噓2(204)
留言6則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《cadywu ( )》之銘言: 請問一下為什麼mode of lognormal distribution是exp(μ-σ^2) 不是exp(μ)? normal distribution機率最大的不是μ嗎? Let Y be r.v. lognormal (μ,σ^2) so we have lnY ~ N(μ,σ^2) , with pdf f(y) μ is the mean of inidcated Normal distribution it is not the mean of lognormal distribution To find E(Y) , we must find pdf of Y first , say k(y) Assume X = lnY , we have J = 1/y so k(y) = f(lnY)(1/y) = [√2π(σy)]^-1 exp[-(lny-μ)^2/2σ^2] ∵ Y = e^X ∴E(Y) = E(e^X) = E (e^tX)︱ = exp[u+(σ^2)/2] t=1 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.10.40

09/03 15:15, , 1F
大大 謝謝你對於mean的推導 不過我還是想問一下
09/03 15:15, 1F

09/03 15:16, , 2F
除了用f(y)的微分求mode的方式以外 還有什麼比較直觀
09/03 15:16, 2F

09/03 15:17, , 3F
的方式 可以解釋為什麼X的mode是μ, 但是Y的mode不是
09/03 15:17, 3F

09/03 15:18, , 4F
exp(μ)嗎? 謝謝~~
09/03 15:18, 4F
Observe the Normal distribution first since the mode m satisfies : f(m) = sup f(x) x it is clear that f(x) has sup at x = μ

09/03 16:35, , 5F
k(y) has sup at x = μ+(σ^2)/2, not μ-σ^2 ?
09/03 16:35, 5F
( my previous assertion is wrong , sorry :p) it is not clear to say the mode of Y is exp (μ-σ^2) d take ─ (ln k(y)) = 0 will be feasible dy then we will have y = exp (μ-σ^2) so the mode of Y will be exp (μ-σ^2) after verifying second derivative it is just an arithmetic process if we fix μ to be constant pdf of Y will tend to be right-skew under greater variance σ ※ 編輯: sapphireBOB 來自: 140.113.10.40 (09/03 18:36)

09/03 18:26, , 6F
能用 mean 推 mode? 那為什麼不能用 median 推 mode?
09/03 18:26, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1EOPh_6e (Math)
文章代碼(AID): #1EOPh_6e (Math)