Re: [問題] 問【龍型態】在雙頭巨人的規則問題
剛剛有朋友問到了類似的問題 我去翻了一下規則
在2010/10/01的規則版本中
似乎又跟這位版友的所說的版本有出入了
當然應該是官方有更動規則啦
連索引號碼都不一樣了
※ 引述《tquendi (tquendi)》之銘言：
: ===========================================================================
: 下面這部份是關於在雙頭巨人戰中，攻擊防守方玩家的定義。
: 806.8b
: Any one-shot effect that refers to the "defending player" refers
: to one specific defending player, not to both of the defending players.
: The controller of the effect chooses which one the spell or ability
: refers to at the time the effect is applied. The same is true for any
: one-shot effect that refers to the "attacking player."
: Any characteristic-defining ability that refers to the"defending player"
: refers to one specific defending player, not to both of the defending
: players. The controller of the object with the characteristic-defining
: ability chooses which one the ability refers to at the time the nonactive
: players become defending players.
: All other cases in which the "defending player" is referred to actually
: refer to both defending players. If the reference involves a positive
: comparison (such as asking whether the defending player controls an Island)
: or a relative comparison (such as asking whether you control more creatures
: than the defending player), it gets only one answer. This answer is "yes"
: if either defending player in the comparison would return a "yes" answer
: if compared individually. If the reference involves a negative comparison
: (such as asking whether the defending player controls no black permanents),
: it also gets only one answer. This answer is "yes" if performing the
: analogous positive comparison would return a "no" answer. The same is true
: for all other cases that refer to the "attacking player."
: 寫的落落長，沒誤解的話大致上的意思就是。
: 進攻的那組所有玩家都是攻擊玩家，被攻擊的那組都是防守玩家。
: 只要是有一個異能或是效應在指定描述攻擊或是防守玩家的時候，
: 效應只會取其中一個人生效。
: 但是其他不是效應指定的所有情況下，防守玩家就表示守方所有的玩家。
: 這時候效應是以邏輯檢定為準。只要對其中一個玩家的邏輯判斷成立
: 整個效應就視為成立。
: 舉例來說，海島行者的能力是"假如防守玩家控制一個海島，就XXXXX"
: 只要防守玩家其中一個人操控海島，那麼海島行者的攻擊就不能被阻擋。
: 同哩，如果效應的邏輯檢定是以負面表述也是相同的道理。
: ===========================================================================
下面是我剛翻到的
802.2a Any rule, object, or effect that refers to a "defending player" refers
to one specific defending player, not to all of the defending players. If an
ability of an attacking creature refers to a defending player, or a spell or
ability refers to both an attacking creature and a defending player, then
unless otherwise specified, the defending player it's referring to is the
player that creature was attacking at the time it became an attacking
creature that combat, or the controller of the planeswalker that creature was
attacking at the time it became an attacking creature that combat. If a spell
or ability could apply to multiple attacking creatures, the appropriate
defending player is individually determined for each of those attacking
creatures. If there are multiple defending players that could be chosen, the
controller of the spell or ability chooses one.
Example: Rob attacks Alex with Runeclaw Bear and attacks Carissa with a
creature with mountainwalk. Whether the creature with mountainwalk is
unblockable depends only on whether Carissa controls a Mountain.
現在只要是提到防守玩家的規則，物品，或效應，都是指定一個防守方玩家
而不是整個防守方
剛好最後面就用山脈行者做範例
ROB用符爪熊打ALEX 用有山脈行者的生物打CARISSA
該有山脈行者的生物能否被阻擋 只以CARISSA有沒有控制山脈來判定
我朋友剛剛的問題是 如果用鬼怪嚮導攻擊 是兩人都要翻牌庫頂 還是只要被打的人翻?
照這規則來看 答案是只要被打的人翻
這回答應該沒錯吧?
如果我理解有誤請糾正我 謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.230.112.165
推
10/09 23:09, , 1F
10/09 23:09, 1F
推
10/10 10:02, , 2F
10/10 10:02, 2F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇)：