[問題] 為甚麼皇家第一戰要派Shield?
皇家在第一戰會派聖盾先發
問題是聖盾通常在第一局很容易掉分
這樣就變成皇家要從落後中追趕
在客場要是第一戰輸了
接下來排的是Ventura
基本上算是菜鳥
在客場萬一第一場輸了
第二場交給菜鳥壓力會很大
說真的
會不會皇家把瓦哥跟聖盾這種老經驗的排在客場
主場派出Ventura,Duffy這兩個菜鳥
才會是比較好的選擇呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.37.167.163
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1412856927.A.7B4.html
推
10/09 20:17, , 1F
10/09 20:17, 1F
推
10/09 20:18, , 2F
10/09 20:18, 2F
→
10/09 20:18, , 3F
10/09 20:18, 3F
推
10/09 20:18, , 4F
10/09 20:18, 4F
→
10/09 20:19, , 5F
10/09 20:19, 5F
→
10/09 20:19, , 6F
10/09 20:19, 6F
→
10/09 20:19, , 7F
10/09 20:19, 7F
噓
10/09 20:20, , 8F
10/09 20:20, 8F
推
10/09 20:20, , 9F
10/09 20:20, 9F
→
10/09 20:20, , 10F
10/09 20:20, 10F
→
10/09 20:20, , 11F
10/09 20:20, 11F
推
10/09 20:21, , 12F
10/09 20:21, 12F
→
10/09 20:24, , 13F
10/09 20:24, 13F
→
10/09 20:26, , 14F
10/09 20:26, 14F
推
10/09 20:29, , 15F
10/09 20:29, 15F
噓
10/09 20:29, , 16F
10/09 20:29, 16F
→
10/09 20:30, , 17F
10/09 20:30, 17F
→
10/09 20:31, , 18F
10/09 20:31, 18F
推
10/09 20:31, , 19F
10/09 20:31, 19F
推
10/09 20:31, , 20F
10/09 20:31, 20F
噓
10/09 20:37, , 21F
10/09 20:37, 21F
→
10/09 20:40, , 22F
10/09 20:40, 22F
噓
10/09 20:42, , 23F
10/09 20:42, 23F
→
10/09 20:42, , 24F
10/09 20:42, 24F
→
10/09 20:43, , 25F
10/09 20:43, 25F
推
10/09 20:44, , 26F
10/09 20:44, 26F
→
10/09 20:55, , 27F
10/09 20:55, 27F
→
10/09 20:55, , 28F
10/09 20:55, 28F
→
10/09 20:56, , 29F
10/09 20:56, 29F
噓
10/09 20:59, , 30F
10/09 20:59, 30F
推
10/09 21:01, , 31F
10/09 21:01, 31F
→
10/09 21:01, , 32F
10/09 21:01, 32F
→
10/09 21:02, , 33F
10/09 21:02, 33F
推
10/09 21:08, , 34F
10/09 21:08, 34F
推
10/09 21:11, , 35F
10/09 21:11, 35F
推
10/09 21:19, , 36F
10/09 21:19, 36F
推
10/09 21:20, , 37F
10/09 21:20, 37F
→
10/09 21:21, , 38F
10/09 21:21, 38F
→
10/09 21:25, , 39F
10/09 21:25, 39F
推
10/09 21:32, , 40F
10/09 21:32, 40F
→
10/09 21:34, , 41F
10/09 21:34, 41F
→
10/09 21:34, , 42F
10/09 21:34, 42F
→
10/09 21:35, , 43F
10/09 21:35, 43F
推
10/09 21:41, , 44F
10/09 21:41, 44F
推
10/09 21:44, , 45F
10/09 21:44, 45F
→
10/09 21:44, , 46F
10/09 21:44, 46F
推
10/09 22:02, , 47F
10/09 22:02, 47F
→
10/09 22:03, , 48F
10/09 22:03, 48F
→
10/09 22:14, , 49F
10/09 22:14, 49F
→
10/09 22:15, , 50F
10/09 22:15, 50F
→
10/09 22:16, , 51F
10/09 22:16, 51F
推
10/09 22:32, , 52F
10/09 22:32, 52F
→
10/09 22:42, , 53F
10/09 22:42, 53F
推
10/09 22:48, , 54F
10/09 22:48, 54F
推
10/09 22:52, , 55F
10/09 22:52, 55F
推
10/09 23:06, , 56F
10/09 23:06, 56F
噓
10/09 23:07, , 57F
10/09 23:07, 57F
噓
10/09 23:29, , 58F
10/09 23:29, 58F
→
10/09 23:30, , 59F
10/09 23:30, 59F
噓
10/09 23:36, , 60F
10/09 23:36, 60F
噓
10/09 23:43, , 61F
10/09 23:43, 61F
噓
10/10 00:24, , 62F
10/10 00:24, 62F
推
10/10 00:33, , 63F
10/10 00:33, 63F
噓
10/10 00:36, , 64F
10/10 00:36, 64F
噓
10/10 01:00, , 65F
10/10 01:00, 65F
噓
10/10 01:21, , 66F
10/10 01:21, 66F
噓
10/10 01:49, , 67F
10/10 01:49, 67F
噓
10/10 02:10, , 68F
10/10 02:10, 68F
推
10/10 02:53, , 69F
10/10 02:53, 69F
→
10/10 02:53, , 70F
10/10 02:53, 70F
→
10/10 02:55, , 71F
10/10 02:55, 71F
噓
10/10 03:51, , 72F
10/10 03:51, 72F
推
10/10 06:00, , 73F
10/10 06:00, 73F
噓
10/10 07:17, , 74F
10/10 07:17, 74F
噓
10/10 16:00, , 75F
10/10 16:00, 75F
→
10/10 16:00, , 76F
10/10 16:00, 76F
噓
10/10 17:42, , 77F
10/10 17:42, 77F
噓
10/11 03:13, , 78F
10/11 03:13, 78F
噓
10/11 09:40, , 79F
10/11 09:40, 79F
推
10/11 10:23, , 80F
10/11 10:23, 80F