[情報] Goose Gossage vs. Mariano Rivera
http://tinyurl.com/b3mqo4d
Goose Gossage is 61, which I guess is old enough to turn the Hall of Fame
relief pitcher into a grumpy old man, or at least a grumpy middle-aged man.
Over the weekend, Gossage told Newsday that Mariano Rivera is certainly
great, BUT ...
"I think that these guys are so dominant in that one-inning role that
they've forgotten what we used to do," the former Yankees closer said. "It
takes three guys to do what we used to do."
Joe Posnaski followed up with a blog post that, well, ripped the Goose a
pretty good one. I do agree with what Joe wrote here:
The obvious reason is that it diminishes Goose Gossage to talk this way.
Goose Gossage was a great pitcher. A truly great pitcher. Gossage is in the
Hall of Fame, he's widely remembered, he does not need to go around telling
people how great he was or how he wasn't used the way pitchers today are
used. I think it cheapens him to do so, especially when he uses the beloved
Mariano Rivera for effect. Rivera has been gracious and classy and
respectful. Gossage shouldn't use him as a prop.
Posnanski then goes into a lengthy discussion of the careers of the two
relievers and why Rivera is the greatest relief pitcher ever:
OK, do you see? Rivera was better. A lot better. He was better in cold
numbers, and he was a lot better when you take into consideration the eras
when they pitched. For Rivera to match Gossage in the basic numbers, he would
have had to pitch 278 more innings -- all those multiple innings that Gossage
pitched -- and he would have to allow 201 more (a tidy 6.51 ERA). He would
have had to walk 350 or so batters in those innings, while allowing 42 home
runs. And he would have had to do all that in a much lower scoring run
environment. I'm guessing here, of course, but I think he could have managed
it.
What I'm wondering, however, is whether that's a fair approach. Tack on a lot
of bad innings so you can see how much better Rivera was than Gossage. I
don't think it's that simple, for several reasons.
First off, it is easier to pitch one inning at a time than the multiple
innings Gossage did, especially early in his career when he had years of
141.2, 133 and 134.1 innings in relief. I don't think anybody really disputes
that. One reason we see so many dominant relief seasons now is because it's
easier to get three outs than five or six or nine. Rivera isn't the only
reliever over the past two decades to post huge numbers; he's just done it
longer than everybody else.
Now, as Posnanski points out, Gossage certainly remembers those three big
seasons of his -- but Goose had just one other 100-inning season in his
career. Posnanski also points out that Gossage's ERA in one-inning relief
appearances in his career wasn't that great (3.75), although I'm guessing
many of those came in the last several years of his career, when he wasn't
the same dominant reliever he had been from 1975 to 1985. Let alone that some
came after he may have pitched three innings the day before.
I think Joe is short-changing Gossage's workload just a bit, even if he did
only have those three super seasons (with one mediocre season as a starter
thrown in). If we rank the most relief innings each pitcher had in a season,
it would go like this:
Gossage
Gossage
Gossage
Rivera
Gossage
Gossage
Gossage
Gossage
Gossage
Rivera
Gossage
Those are all their seasons with at least 80 innings (not counting Gossage's
year as a starter). Rivera had two; Gossage had eight, including six of at
least 90 innings, something Rivera did just once, as a setup guy in 1996.
What we don't know is how dominant Gossage would have been if he'd had
Rivera's workload. He had a career 2.77 ERA as a reliever (Rivera's is 2.05
in, as Posnanski also points out, a higher-scoring era). But isn't it likely
Gossage would have been more dominant pitching in one-inning stints? That
maybe he would have remained great into his late 30s instead of declining in
his mid-30s if he hadn't had such a heavy workload early in his career?
And likewise, we don't know what would have happened to Rivera if had come up
in 1975 instead of 1995. Maybe he burns out after a few years, unable to
handle those 130-inning seasons. Maybe he's great for a decade and then, like
Gossage, slowly peters out. Ultimately, it's a question that can't be
answered, just like we don't know what would have happened had Rivera been
moved back as a starter at some point.
Look, is Rivera the greatest relief pitcher of all time? I do believe he is.
He's been so good for so long -- not to mention his postseason record (0.70
ERA in 141 innings) -- that it's hard to make any other argument. But
comparing relief pitchers across generations is even more difficult than
other positions.
I don't think Gossage is entirely off base, however. Even if he is a cranky
middle-aged guy who played in an era where one of the major issues was
complaining about beer being removed from the clubhouse after games.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.25.133
推
03/13 11:11, , 1F
03/13 11:11, 1F
推
03/13 11:21, , 2F
03/13 11:21, 2F
→
03/13 11:21, , 3F
03/13 11:21, 3F
推
03/13 11:46, , 4F
03/13 11:46, 4F
推
03/13 11:48, , 5F
03/13 11:48, 5F
推
03/13 11:51, , 6F
03/13 11:51, 6F
→
03/13 12:33, , 7F
03/13 12:33, 7F
→
03/13 12:33, , 8F
03/13 12:33, 8F
→
03/13 12:40, , 9F
03/13 12:40, 9F
推
03/13 12:45, , 10F
03/13 12:45, 10F
推
03/13 12:51, , 11F
03/13 12:51, 11F
推
03/13 12:52, , 12F
03/13 12:52, 12F
→
03/13 13:30, , 13F
03/13 13:30, 13F
推
03/13 13:33, , 14F
03/13 13:33, 14F
→
03/13 13:34, , 15F
03/13 13:34, 15F
→
03/13 13:36, , 16F
03/13 13:36, 16F
→
03/13 13:36, , 17F
03/13 13:36, 17F
→
03/13 13:36, , 18F
03/13 13:36, 18F
→
03/13 13:37, , 19F
03/13 13:37, 19F
推
03/13 13:37, , 20F
03/13 13:37, 20F
推
03/13 13:38, , 21F
03/13 13:38, 21F
推
03/13 13:38, , 22F
03/13 13:38, 22F
→
03/13 13:38, , 23F
03/13 13:38, 23F
→
03/13 13:39, , 24F
03/13 13:39, 24F
→
03/13 13:39, , 25F
03/13 13:39, 25F
→
03/13 13:39, , 26F
03/13 13:39, 26F
→
03/13 13:39, , 27F
03/13 13:39, 27F
→
03/13 13:40, , 28F
03/13 13:40, 28F
→
03/13 13:40, , 29F
03/13 13:40, 29F
→
03/13 13:41, , 30F
03/13 13:41, 30F
→
03/13 13:41, , 31F
03/13 13:41, 31F
推
03/13 13:45, , 32F
03/13 13:45, 32F
推
03/13 13:49, , 33F
03/13 13:49, 33F
→
03/13 13:53, , 34F
03/13 13:53, 34F
推
03/13 14:02, , 35F
03/13 14:02, 35F
→
03/13 14:02, , 36F
03/13 14:02, 36F
→
03/13 14:03, , 37F
03/13 14:03, 37F
→
03/13 14:03, , 38F
03/13 14:03, 38F
→
03/13 14:06, , 39F
03/13 14:06, 39F
→
03/13 14:06, , 40F
03/13 14:06, 40F
推
03/13 14:37, , 41F
03/13 14:37, 41F
→
03/13 14:43, , 42F
03/13 14:43, 42F
→
03/13 14:47, , 43F
03/13 14:47, 43F
推
03/13 15:32, , 44F
03/13 15:32, 44F
→
03/13 15:33, , 45F
03/13 15:33, 45F
→
03/13 21:26, , 46F
03/13 21:26, 46F
噓
03/14 10:55, , 47F
03/14 10:55, 47F
→
03/17 00:09, , 48F
03/17 00:09, 48F
→
12/26 18:01,
5年前
, 49F
12/26 18:01, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):